# Wednesday, December 14, 2005

The Seattle PI reports:

In an effort to drum up support for a proposal requiring background checks on those who buy firearms at gun shows, a gun control advocacy group reported a survey strongly supporting the idea. 

Washington Ceasefire conducted the survey, asking 403 registered voters whether they would be more or less likely to support candidates who wanted to close a loophole in state law that allows gun sales without background checks at gun shows.

...

Current state law allows people to buy firearms at gun shows without a background check, although federal law requires such checks when the firearm is sold at a store.

There is a problem with this article.  This last sentence is false.  And I'm willing to bet (an extremely rare thing for me to do) the survey takers worded their question(s) in such a way that they mislead the people being surveyed in a similar manner. 

The truth is Federal law does not even define a gun show let along make some sort of exception for them.  The laws that apply at a gun store apply at a gun show, the parking lot at the mall, and your backyard.  There is a reason these people lie--the truth is painful to them.  They cannot hope to get their way if they stick to the truth.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, December 14, 2005 8:06:43 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

I'm surprised this is occurring in Iowa.  California, Massachusetts, and even Washington state.  But Iowa?  Apparently the Iowa constitution looks friendly to the pursuit of gay marriage via the courts. 

DES MOINES -- A gay rights group filed a lawsuit on behalf of six gay and lesbian couples Tuesday in Polk County District Court, asking for the right to marry for same-sex couples.

Lambda Legal, which has spearheaded the same-sex marriage drive across the country, said it wants full recognition of the civil rights of same-sex couples.

I'm all for gay marriage but I'm not comfortable with it being implemented via the courts.  I would prefer that it happen legislatively or via a popular vote of the people.  Particularly when it is indisputable that the original intent of the constitution or law being utilized was that marriage only be for men and women.  The original intent may have been wrong but there is a procedure for changing it that should be utilized.  Changing the meaning via the courts is just wrong.  Freedom of the press could just as easily come to mean the government printing office has the freedom to print the news but private or corporate "press" is not.  You think it couldn't happen?  Look at what has happened with the Second Amendment.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, December 14, 2005 7:48:30 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [7]  | 

Our laws can be friendly to those who obey them, and too often useful to those who don't.
    
Cullen Hightower
[Among the most useful laws to those that disobey them are the laws that attempt to ban or restrict goods or services.  The black market always finds a way whether it is something physical like booze, guns or recreational drugs or some service such as high interest loans (loan sharking), gambling or prostitution.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, December 14, 2005 7:29:58 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Tuesday, December 13, 2005

It's been cold in Moscow recently-- then the fog rolled in.  The result was everything became covered in ice crystals.  Xenia has the pictures.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:55:31 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

I previously reported PNNL screwed up a corporate American Express account I had at PNNL by not forwarding the bills to me after my wrongful termination.  I received a bill from American Express last month then tried to call AE a couple times and had the call dropped or otherwise wasn't able to get things straightened out.  Honestly, I didn't put much effort into it.  I would get so angry over it that I just wanted to ignore it.  I got another bill on Saturday and opened it up yesterday.  Surprise!  The bill has been paid.  I presume someone at PNNL read my posting (I know some of them do read my blog) and made sure it got taken care of at that end.

Whoever you are, thank you.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:50:52 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise.

Adolf Hitler
[For my readers, see Dan's comment, that don't "feel" people living under restrictive gun laws are oppressed.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, December 13, 2005 5:10:36 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Monday, December 12, 2005

If this had been in a gun friendly state in the U.S. these scumbags would be suffering from acute lead poisoning after about the second "unannounced visit" and the expected winners of the next Darwin awards.  Instead they invaded several homes before getting caught and will get another chance to invade homes after they get out.

A Dublin man was tonight sentenced to nine years in jail for trying to force a young woman to have sex with her flatmate and then cutting her with a knife.

Stephen Phelan, 20, from Poddle Close in Kimmage was found guilty of aggravated sexual assault and assault causing harm to the woman by a jury in June.

At the sentencing hearing, Judge Phillip O’Sullivan also imposed concurrent sentences ranging from three to seven years for 17 other offences carried out on the same night.

On February 11 2003, Phelan and an accomplice began a spree of burglaries which led to the sexual assault, the stabbing of a student nine times and the crashing of a car into a Dublin Bus.

Judge O’Sullivan said Phelan had been involved in a series of violent incidents and outlined the impact on his victims: post traumatic stress disorder, the loss of power in an arm, permanent scar wounds and a fear of sleeping alone at night.

“No summary of mine can do justice to the trauma suffered by these people,” he said.

He imposed a five-year probation sentence on Phelan to commence on his release, after hearing from a psychiatrist who said he had serious reservations about him getting out into society again under the influence of drugs.

Phelan had been spending €1500-€1600 euro a day on crack cocaine and had been using robberies to fund his habit.

Detective Sergeant George McGeary said Phelan and his accomplice, who has since fled the jurisdiction, had broken into a house in Harold’s Cross, where four people were living, including the young woman.

They armed themselves with a screwdriver, a Stanley knife, a Swiss army knife, a dumb-bell and a hacksaw.

After searching the house for property and money, Phelan went into the bedroom of a 24-year-old tenant. She screamed when she saw him and shouted at her flatmate to get her trousers.

The court heard he came into the room and told her: “Give us what we want or we’ll cut you.”

He was unable to find her ATM card and told her to take off her clothes, where he believed she was concealing it.

Later in the burglary, he came back into her room and told her to lie down on the bed or he would cut her nipples.

She refused several times to take off her clothes but then Phelan came back, held a knife to her throat and told her to ’take off her f*****g clothes’.

Detective Sergeant McGeary told the court that she was crying while she took her trouser bottoms off.

He used his knife to cut off her underwear and then told her to have sex with one of her two male flatmates.

He refused, saying “She’s my friend” but was then cut twice on the upper arm in a X shape.

The young woman was then ordered into the bedroom of another flatmate, who had been forced to lie naked on the bed.

Phelan told them to have sex together and they kissed, pretending to have sex.

Phelan then cut the woman’s buttocks with a knife and also made a cut running from the top of her back to the base.

Detective Sergeant McGeary told the court that the flatmates had been terrified by Phelan’s threats.

Home invasions are rare where people's rights to defend themselves are not infringed by oppressive governments.  And this is just a hint of some of the things that happen.

Joe Huffman  Monday, December 12, 2005 9:36:21 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [7]  | 

In case you hadn't noticed the identical ads on so many different blogs, including the second one from the top here on the right.  Here is the story:

The MSNBC cable network plans to flood the Internet this week with its largest concentrated online pitch, running advertising on hundreds of Web sites and blogs. The cost of the campaign, to promote three prime-time programs, is estimated at just under $1 million.

There's more to the story but basically they are trying to see if they can drive traffic from the internet to their cable channel.  They are advertising on 800 different blogs.  I wish I was getting 1/800 of $1,000,000 but I'm not.  I'm far, far cheaper than that.  So far they have had 24 clicks from 313 page views.  That, 7.67%, is a rather outstanding click through rate.  My boomershoot ad only gets 1.73% and the t-shirt ad currently on top gets 2.94%.

Joe Huffman  Monday, December 12, 2005 8:32:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

I don't know if this is something to be looking out for or if it's just some random event. But from watching my sitemeter I discovered the following. The ATF ("Executive Office of the Asset Forfeiture" no less!) just did a web search for the words {exploding targets}.  Regardless of their intent I doubt that it will affect Boomershoot much since we don't sell them just provide the opportunity to shoot at them.  But it might affect Tannerite and others.  Or it could just be they wanted to purchase some for their own amusement.  Further conjecture on my part would be unwarranted.

Domain Name   atfonline.gov ? (United States Government)
IP Address   199.196.144.# (Executive Office of Asset Forfeiture)
199.196.144.17
ISP   Executive Office of Asset Forfeiture
Location  
Continent  :  North America
Country  :  United States  (Facts)
State  :  Virginia
City  :  Dulles
Lat/Long  :  39.0853, -77.6452 (Map)
Language   English (United States)
en-us
Operating System   Microsoft Win2000
Browser   Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)
Javascript   version 1.3
Monitor  
Resolution  :  1024 x 768
Color Depth  :  32 bits
Time of Visit   Dec 12 2005 11:28:00 am
Last Page View   Dec 12 2005 11:29:42 am
Visit Length   1 minute 42 seconds
Page Views   2
Referring URL
http://www.dogpile.c...7/top/-/Moderate/0/1
Visit Entry Page   http://blog.joehuffm...ploding Targets.aspx
Visit Exit Page   http://blog.joehuffm...merite II Tests.aspx
Time Zone   UTC-6:00
CST - Central Standard Time
CDT - Central Daylight Saving Time
Visitor's Time   Dec 12 2005 1:28:00 pm
Visit Number   52,344
Joe Huffman  Monday, December 12, 2005 12:05:00 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

My generation of Canadians grew up believing that, if we were very good or very smart, we would someday graduate from Canada.

Robert Fulford
[Particularily relevant now with the proposed ban on handguns in Canada.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Monday, December 12, 2005 5:00:13 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Sunday, December 11, 2005

I believe this was entirely mishandled.  I would have used my camera (the cell phone camera if nothing else) to take pictures for the web.

Sex
Joe Huffman  Sunday, December 11, 2005 6:51:55 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

It's too early to know for certain if it was an accident or if it was terrorism.  And even if it was determined to be terrorism there is a good chance that knowledge would be restricted.  In any case, it sure was a big explosion (latest news here):

A series of explosions rocked a major oil depot just north of London just before dawn Sunday, injuring 36 people.

Huge balls of fire shot into the sky and the area was filled with clouds of thick, black smoke.

People living nearby have been forced to leave their homes in Hemel Hempstead.

Some residents said they heard a small plane flying overhead just before the first blast. But Hertfordshire police said rumours that the aircraft was involved were unfounded.

Witnesses said there were three explosions at the Buncefield fuel depot. The blasts were heard as far away as the Netherlands.

Some firefighters said that this was the biggest fire they've ever tackled.

Thick clouds of smoke were spreading to the southeast and southwest, but were not believed to be toxic.

The oil depot supplies fuel for a large part of southeast England. However, a spokesperwosn for oil giant BP said there would be no problems with fuel shortages.

And if it does happen that it was a terrorist attack the VPC and Brady Bunch should take note that this sort of thing happens even where .50 BMG's are banned.  It's the people not the guns.

Joe Huffman  Sunday, December 11, 2005 6:39:57 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

It's not much, but it's a start:

READING, England -- During his training to become a British police officer, Ben Johnson recalled, an instructor told him and other recruits, "If you ever see somebody carrying a gun, turn and run away as quickly as possible."

"It was a bizarre situation," said Johnson, 34, a former police officer in Garland, Tex., and U.S. Army soldier who moved here with his British wife three years ago and became this country's first non-British police officer. He said running from trouble was exactly the opposite of what he learned as an American cop.

Now Johnson is publicly challenging one of the great traditions of law enforcement in Britain, what he calls the "old-fashioned idea of the unarmed bobby on the beat." He has written to his chief asking for permission to carry a gun, arguing that Britain is no longer safe for unarmed and under-trained police officers. He says he will resign if the chief refuses.

Johnson's case has caused a media furor here, partly because an American -- a Texan no less -- is claiming he feels less safe as a police officer in Britain than he did on the beat in the United States, which is routinely portrayed here as a gun-drunk Wild West.

...

Britain has some of the world's toughest gun-control laws, and violent crime, while increasing, is still far less common than in the United States. There were 184 murders last year in London, a city of more than 7 million people, compared with 572 in New York City, which has 8 million people.

...

"The U.K. is changing rapidly, and the police have been slow to adapt," said Johnson, 6-foot-4 and razor thin, cradling his infant daughter in his lap in the dining room of his neat row house. "We should value the lives of police officers enough to properly equip them and train them to do the job -- even if that means getting rid of some old-fashioned notions."

He said he had 36 weeks of academy training and supervised field work to become a police officer in Texas. But at Thames Valley he said he received less than half that, and most of the instruction involved how to fill out paperwork.

Johnson said British officers are instructed to retreat if they see a gun and call for backup from armed officers, but that can give suspects time to escape.

I love how they compare the entire U.K. London, with tough gun control laws, to NYC also with tough gun control laws.  Why not compare it to the states of Washington and Idaho combined?  Those states are almost friendly to gun owners and the right to self defense.  They have about the same population and a good mix of urban and rural areas.  Why?  Because it's the Washington Post and they have an agenda.  Here is a comparison they could have done:

Washington and Idaho Population according to the 2000 census: 5894143 + 1293953 => 7188096
Washington and Idaho murders and non-negligent manslaughter (FBI Year 2000 UCR): 196 + 16 => 212.

So, even with the "gun-drunk" Wild West states of Washington and Idaho the number of murders is comparable.  Could it be that something other than rate of gun ownership is the dominate factor?  Any sane person would conclude that, but the anti-gun bigots aren't sane.  That there is even a debate about keeping policemen disarmed in the U.K. is further proof of that nationwide case of Hoplophobia.  Fortunately there is help--if they would just take advantage of it.

Update: My mistake.  The Washington post comparison was London to NYC, not the entire UK to NYC.  I'll update with city to city murder rates when I have more time.

Joe Huffman  Sunday, December 11, 2005 5:54:11 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

If it can't be expressed in figures, it is not science; it is opinion.

Robert Heinlein
[One of my favorite Heinlein quotes.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Sunday, December 11, 2005 12:02:07 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Saturday, December 10, 2005

It's an exceedingly rare event when I encourage people to help Washington Ceasefire rather than Washington Ceasefear.  But this is one of those rare times.  Ceasefire is conducting a poll.  The question of the poll is: "How serious do you think handgun violence is in Washington?"  Currently the results of the poll (on the main page, this may not last long) are:

Answer Votes Percentage
Not at all serious: 14 60.%
Very serious: 6 26.1%
Somewhat serious: 2 8.7%
Not very serious: 1 4.3%
A little serious: 0 0.0%

There are so few votes it's not a good statistical sample.  Why don't we help them out?  And just to be fair--only vote once.

Update (04:20, December 12, 2005): Analog Kid posted about the poll and his readers helped out too.  Thanks to everyone that participated. Here are the latest results:

Answer Votes Percentage
Not at all serious: 425 77.6%
Not very serious: 83 15.1%
Very serious: 27 4.9%
A little serious: 11 8.7%
Somewhat serious: 2 0.4%
Joe Huffman  Saturday, December 10, 2005 11:41:30 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

Considering recent news from Canada and the real reason for Boomershoot I have decided to give Canadians entering Boomershoot 2006 a rebate of one half the price their entry fee.  Payable upon showing their Canadian drivers license or other proof of Canadian citizenship at Boomershoot 2006.

Joe Huffman  Saturday, December 10, 2005 1:33:15 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Those who sell their liberty for security are understandable, if pitiable, creatures. Those who sell the liberty of others for wealth, power, or even a moment's respite deserve only the end of a rope.

L. Neil Smith

Joe Huffman  Saturday, December 10, 2005 12:10:52 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
# Friday, December 09, 2005

Happiness is being near the top of the food chain.

Back of a T-shirt worn by
Greg Hamilton
Self defense and firearms instructor
September 15, 1997
[Also applicable to the truth laid bear ecosystem for blogs.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Friday, December 09, 2005 9:42:16 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Thursday, December 08, 2005

The new address is http://captjason.blogspot.com.  I have also created a backup site that I will update about once a week so we don't lose all the postings and comments if something catastrophic happens to blogspot.com.  The backup site is http://www.joehuffman.org/Jason.

This post will stay at the top for one week.  See below for newer postings.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, December 08, 2005 9:36:33 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

The following story reminds me of this old joke:

I went to the County Fair. They had one of those "Believe it or not?" shows.

They had a man born with a penis and a brain.

Here's the story:

Syracuse University biology professor Scott Pitnick knows a lot about the birds and the bees (or in this case, bats). He teaches courses in evolution and population biology, and researches topics such as sexual selection, sexual conflict and speciation. His latest research sheds light on a little-explored area of evolutionary biology: the contribution of sexual selection to brain evolution. “The brain can be considered the most important ‘sex organ,’” says Pitnick. “Nevertheless, the relationship between breeding system and relative brain size has received little investigation.”

A recent study by Pitnick and colleagues Kate Jones of the Institute of Zoology at the Zoological Society of London and Jerry Wilkinson of the Department of Biology at the University of Maryland was funded by the National Science Foundation and used comparative analysis to show that bat species that roost in larger social groups and those with promiscuous females have relatively smaller brains than species with females that are faithful to their mates. Male infidelity, by contrast, had no evolutionary impact on relative brain size.

According to Pitnick, a likely explanation for this relationship relates to the energetic demands of producing and maintaining both brain and sperm cells; males cannot afford a lot of both. Under this explanation, males with relatively large testes and small brains leave more offspring than larger-brained, less fertile, competitors.

“When females mate with more than one male, sperm compete to fertilize the female’s eggs. Such ‘sperm competition’ is rife in many bat species, perhaps due in part to the unusual ability (among mammals at least) of sperm to survive inside the female’s reproductive tract for a very long time,” says Pitnick. “The
male who ejaculates the greatest number of sperm may win at this game, and hence many bats have evolved outrageously big testes—as much as 8.5% of their body mass. Because they live on an energetic knife-edge, bats may not be able to evolutionarily afford both big testes and big brains. We’re excited about these results, as they may stimulate more research into the correlated evolution of brains, behavior and the extravagant and costly ornaments and armaments favored by sexual selection.”

The full results of Pitnick’s study have recently been published in Proceedings B (London) a biology journal of the Royal Society, the United Kingdom’s national academy of science.

You know what this means, don't you?  If someone says you have big balls they are also saying you are pea brain and your mother was promiscuous.

Sex
Joe Huffman  Thursday, December 08, 2005 7:05:43 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Yahoo News reports:

OTTAWA (CP) - Prime Minister Paul Martin will venture into a violence-plagued area of Toronto on Thursday to announce a sweeping ban on handguns, The Canadian Press has learned.

Martin was scheduled to visit Toronto's troubled Jane-Finch area to make a "safer communities announcement." Liberal sources have confirmed the announcement includes an "outright" ban on handguns.

However, there will be exceptions for competitive target shooters, gun collectors and peace officers, a Liberal insider said on condition of anonymity. The source would not explain any more details of the policy proposal.

Handguns are already severely restricted in Canada and a handgun registry has been in force for more than 60 years.

...

Windsor MP Joe Comartin, the New Democratic Party's justice critic, said the announcement sounds like "smoke and mirrors."

"Basically, all handguns in Canada are illegal now," said Comartin. "The only people who get permits are those who are using them for recreational purposes or those who need it for their own personal safety and there's not a lot of those that are granted."

He said the announcement sounds like "a political ploy during an election to garner some headlines and make it look like you're actually doing something when, in fact, what you're proposing is pretty meaningless."

...

It remains to be seen how the ban will go over in rural areas, where the issue is more about rifles. Many Prairie rifle owners have never forgiven the Liberals for creating a registry for long guns.

Created 10 years ago, the registry was supposed to cost a mere $2 million. Instead, its cost has ballooned to more than $1 billion.

The Conservatives, who declined comment on the expected handgun ban Wednesday, have called the program a boondoggle and Auditor General Sheila Fraser has sharply criticized the waste and mismanagment that have pervaded the registry.

Gun owners warned at the time that the registry was the first step toward confiscation of their guns. Martin's announcement may be seen as confirmation of their worst fears.

...

Wendy Cukier, who co-founded the Coalition for Gun Control after the Montreal massacre, said the government has yet to live up to previous promises to ban the AR-15 semi-assault rifle and the Ruger Mini-14, the same weapon used in the Polytechnique shootings.

But she said existing laws limiting the use of rifles and shotguns have been successful.

"Overall gun death and injury in Canada is way down," Cukier said. "Where we've actually seen a slight increase is in murders with handguns and so clearly our existing laws are not addressing the handgun problem and something is needed."

...

"It's going to accomplish nothing," said Wayne Fields of LaSalle, Ont., president of the Law-Abiding Registered Firearms Association. "There's already all types of legislation and illegal use of handguns is out of control."

Quick correction, it should be Law-Abiding Unregistered Firearms Association.

I've commented on Cukier before (and here, and here). I'm certain she is not ignorant on this issue, I think James has her pegged, and she is deliberately misleading when she says "gun death and injury in Canada is way down".  That's not the issue.  The issue is what is the total crime rate?  As you restrict weapons the population at large is made less safe because criminals have a safer working environment.  You have reduced the total cost to being a criminal.  A criminal can be successful simply by being large, strong, or armed with a simpler and/or cheaper weapon.  If you could magically eliminate all firearms from the planet you could set the firearm death rate to zero but the total murder rate could climb.  There is Just One Question at issue here and Cukier dodges it.

And of course assurances by the anti-freedom bigots that a gun registry won't be used for confiscation are worthless.  That is the only thing it is good for.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:21:19 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Gun bans are an attempt to confiscate the right of self-defense.  Politicians perennially react to the police's total failure to control crime by trying to disarm law-abiding citizens.  In a nutshell, gun bans mean that because criminals abuse guns, law-abiding citizen have no right to defend themselves.

James Bovard
Lost Rights
ISBN 0-312-12333-7
Copyright 1994, 1995

Joe Huffman  Thursday, December 08, 2005 5:37:21 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Wednesday, December 07, 2005

I have been a fan of Oleg Volk's photographs for many years.  These are some fairly new ones:

http://www.olegvolk.net/gallery/arms/guncontrol4677
http://www.olegvolk.net/gallery/arms/swordmaidentwo5009
http://www.olegvolk.net/gallery/arms/allpink4803

I think my daughter Xenia would especially like the second one.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, December 07, 2005 11:25:13 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

I don't read much of AR15.com--mostly just when I see hits coming in on Boomershoot.org from it.  Today this link was posted on an public folder at work.  Some of the AR-15.com crowd claim it's the funniest post ever.  It could be--it's very good.  But you probably have to be a moderately well trained gun person to get the totality of the humor.

Aside from the humor there are some important lessons to be learned from the pictures and the comments.  I'll leave those lessons unstated so that it is less likely inappropriate people learn them.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, December 07, 2005 11:07:09 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

I ran across the following comment today.  As I am a great fan of understatment as well as sick humor I just had to share:

History will show that being nuked repeatedly has great calming influence on the "We should rule the world because it's our divine right" types.

Sort of like Greg Hamilton's "Universal Hand Signal" for "lie down" as applied to individuals.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, December 07, 2005 10:58:23 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Samantha Burns is looking for PC alternatives for the names of various types of terrorists.  The moonbats don't like being called animal-rights terrorists, ecoterrorist, etc.  Any idea?  I'll have to think about it some but I think it's a worthy endeavor.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:04:03 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  | 

People may be ignorant, yes. But it is a willful ignorance. They don’t want the truth. No matter how many times I explain they are wrong, no matter how much evidence I give them they don’t care. Their belief makes them feel good and that’s good enough for them.

And this understanding of people’s willful ignorance leads directly to my lack of faith in humanity. I don’t trust people to fix the political system, I don’t trust people to see religion for what it is, I don’t trust people to see the truth that is in front of them, and I don’t trust people to be smart. People don’t want to question their beliefs, they’re happy being ignorant and it doesn’t matter how much I argue with them they won’t change. Therefore they are not worth my time. The majority of mankind doesn’t care for truth and so I don’t care for them.

James Huffman-Scott
Speech for Comm 101
2001
From http://www.joehuffman.org/misc/LifeChange.htm

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, December 07, 2005 12:00:18 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  | 
# Tuesday, December 06, 2005

Probably not something you would give your mother.  And not recommended for office wear--except maybe at Planned Parenthood.  100% latex condoms.

Thanks to Samatha Burns for pointing this out.  She has links to other clothes made with condoms here.

Sex
Joe Huffman  Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:56:35 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |