# Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Bloomberg.com has the best reporting I have seen so far on the war on the western front:

In the 12th night of rioting, French police said 1,173 cars were torched in 226 districts in cities including Toulouse, Lyon, Marseille and Avignon, bringing the total of burned vehicles to almost 6,000. The euro fell to a two-year low against the dollar as incidents of violence were reported in Germany and Belgium.

The rioting is the longest stretch of urban violence in France since a student uprising in 1968, reflecting tensions in neighborhoods marked by large immigrant communities and youth unemployment of more than 30 percent. It puts pressure on the government to better integrate largely Muslim communities, and sets immigration and equal opportunity at the center of the political debate 18 months before presidential elections.

They actually used the 'M' word but then they come to the conclusion that more socialism is needed:

In a bid to help cool tensions, de Villepin proposed boosting spending on training and education programs in poor neighborhoods and called for the country to step up its fight against discrimination of minorities.

...

De Villepin's call for increased spending on training programs comes amid rising unemployment among immigrants. Last year, 17.4 percent of immigrants were unemployed, compared with 9.2 percent for non-immigrants, says Insee, the Paris-based government statistics office. For the same education level, immigrants are more likely to be unemployed, it said.

"Youth unemployment reaches almost 40 percent in some areas,'' de Villepin said. He added that the goal of the government will be to give unemployed youth living in France's ``sensitive urban areas'' a work contract, an internship or training in coming months.

De Villepin also said he will restore government subsidies to local associations scrapped by his predecessor and aims to triple scholarships and improve links between universities and students living in poor areas.

The prime minister said in the interview that students must be able to join vocational training programs at the age of 14 instead of 16. Almost 150,000 students drop out of school without a diploma or a skill each year, according to the prime minister.

De Villepin also called for businesses and the population as a whole to fight ethnic discrimination. The government wants to make sure that the riots aren't used by "radical Islam,'' which is not the "main'' concern at the moment, he said.

That's not entirely fair to all the French government officials.  This one appears to have a clue and the strength of character to admit failure.  From the Independent (UK):

The Socialist mayor of Noisy-le Grand, Michel Pajon, called for the army to be brought in. "I am sounding the alarm," he said. "You can't let things get as bad as this." He said he recognised that for a Socialist to ask for military intervention was "an absolutely unimaginable admission of failure". M. de Villepin said he did not plan to bring in the military at this stage.

In an editorial brought to my attention by The Gun Guy Mark Steyn of the Chicago Sun-Times has this to say:

Ever since 9/11, I've been gloomily predicting the European powder keg's about to go up. ''By 2010 we'll be watching burning buildings, street riots and assassinations on the news every night,'' I wrote in Canada's Western Standard back in February.

Silly me. The Eurabian civil war appears to have started some years ahead of my optimistic schedule.

This observation of Mr. Steyn was of particular interest to me:

The notion that Texas neocon arrogance was responsible for frosting up trans-Atlantic relations was always preposterous, even for someone as complacent and blinkered as John Kerry. If you had millions of seething unassimilated Muslim youths in lawless suburbs ringing every major city, would you be so eager to send your troops into an Arab country fighting alongside the Americans? For half a decade, French Arabs have been carrying on a low-level intifada against synagogues, kosher butchers, Jewish schools, etc. The concern of the political class has been to prevent the spread of these attacks to targets of more, ah, general interest. They seem to have lost that battle. Unlike America's Europhiles, France's Arab street correctly identified Chirac's opposition to the Iraq war for what it was: a sign of weakness.

How interesting!  I read in another article about 10% of the population in France is Muslim.  That makes France's response (opposition) to our war on terrorists a little more rational--they had their own people being held hostage.

I really should read some world history on this war that has been going on for the last 1300 years or so.  Mr. Steyn gives us a short lesson:

The French have been here before, of course. Seven-thirty-two. Not 7:32 Paris time, which is when the nightly Citroen-torching begins, but 732 A.D. -- as in one and a third millennia ago. By then, the Muslims had advanced a thousand miles north of Gibraltar to control Spain and southern France up to the banks of the Loire. In October 732, the Moorish general Abd al-Rahman and his Muslim army were not exactly at the gates of Paris, but they were within 200 miles, just south of the great Frankish shrine of St. Martin of Tours. Somewhere on the road between Poitiers and Tours, they met a Frankish force and, unlike other Christian armies in Europe, this one held its ground ''like a wall . . . a firm glacial mass,'' as the Chronicle of Isidore puts it. A week later, Abd al-Rahman was dead, the Muslims were heading south, and the French general, Charles, had earned himself the surname ''Martel'' -- or ''the Hammer.''

And he makes an frightening observation about the present and the future:

If Chirac isn't exactly Charles Martel, the rioters aren't doing a bad impression of the Muslim armies of 13 centuries ago: They're seizing their opportunities, testing their foe, probing his weak spots. If burning the 'burbs gets you more ''respect'' from Chirac, they'll burn 'em again, and again. In the current issue of City Journal, Theodore Dalrymple concludes a piece on British suicide bombers with this grim summation of the new Europe: ''The sweet dream of universal cultural compatibility has been replaced by the nightmare of permanent conflict.'' Which sounds an awful lot like a new Dark Ages.

Ry and I were chatting yesterday and we were of the opinion that if it weren't for the nukes France has we should just let France burn and serve as an example for the rest of Europe.  There are many lessons to be learned from such an example: 1) The government can't always protect you--there is a reason for the right to keep and bear arms, 2) The extremist Muslim culture must be destroyed, 3) Socialism is (again) proved a failure, and 4) Probably most importantly--appeasement is never a viable long term solution.

But because they do have nukes which we cannot let fall into the hands of the terrorists we probably will have to get involved as France falls.  It's possible that France will not fall but I'm not hopeful.  There is no unity in their government and they are candidates for a When Prophecy Fails award with their proposed solution of more socialism to stop the riots.  My initial heartless, cold blooded, rational approach to the problem of the nukes is to watch the situation carefully and when it becomes clear the nukes will fall into the hands of the terrorists to preemptively strike them with our own nukes.  We don't have the manpower to seize them so we must destroy them in such a way that the materials are not salvageable.  That's the ruthless, heartless approach.  There may be another way.  Perhaps we could make an offer to the French to transport the nukes and government officials to a safe location prior to them falling into the wrong hands.  I'm thinking maybe Quebec would have them.  I'm not sure I want Quebec in possession of nukes but it's better than Islamic extremists having them.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:24:05 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Families, when a child is born
Want it to be intelligent.
I, through intelligence,
Having wrecked my whole life,
Only hope the baby will prove
Ignorant and stupid.
Then he will crown a tranquil life
By becoming a Cabinet Minister

Su Tung-p'o
[I'm thinking of people like the "minister for social cohesion" in France as a prime example but nearly any would do.]

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, November 08, 2005 4:48:49 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Monday, November 07, 2005

I had planned to do the latest rifle postal match today.  Results are due by midnight tonight.  Then I got a call from someone else that is having some "unpleasant" dealings with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.  We ended up talking for an hour or more.  This person knew of other cases similar to mine where Battelle (the company that manages PNNL) decided to fire someone and then found the slimmest of pretexts to do so.  Although the root of the problems we are having is very different we both had similar frustrations in getting action to be taken by the appropriate authorities.  In both cases it appears that by the letter of the law there should be people at PNNL facing fines and/or jail but in practical terms the law doesn't apply to them.  We collaborated some and shared some information and brainstormed on different approaches.  It was a useful exercise.

I got a letter from my Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) attorney.  He resubmitted the FOIA request for material which PNNL previously told me doesn't exist.  I know the material exists because I created a lot of the material.  He reworded things a little differently so maybe that will make a difference.  There really needs to be some penalties for the jerks that defy FOIA and the Privacy Act.  As near as I can tell the law says, "You must do this." but there are no consequences if they don't comply.  After all the instances of injustice and illegality in their dealings I'm surprised there haven't been some cases of heavy metal (lead comes to mind) poisoning or something at Battelle and/or PNNL.

After I had dealt with the phone call and a couple of other things that just had to be done today I was faced with doing the rifle match in both the dark and in the rain.  I've done both, but never at the same time.  I decided to pass on the match this time.  I did some rifle shooting in the last month.  I nailed a deer in the spine of the neck at 255 yards last week so I guess that will have to be sufficient for now.  I really shouldn't procrastinate so much on these things.  If I need to shoot something I should just get out there and do it.  I participated in an IPSC match ("combat pistol") yesterday so it's not like I'm completely ignoring getting some trigger time in.  I wasn't shooting all that bad but I wasn't shooting very good either.  I came in 4th overall out of 14.  If I hadn't had the one miss I would have come in 3rd.  More practice is needed--after I start work I should have time to hit the indoor ranges in the Seattle area.

Joe Huffman  Monday, November 07, 2005 4:35:17 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

Interesting info from Australia:

Australian authorities believe they have foiled a major terrorist attack, arresting 15 people on Tuesday during raids in the country's two biggest cities of Sydney and Melbourne.

The arrests come less than a week after Prime Minster John Howard said Australia received intelligence about a "terrorist threat".

Other sources include:

Assuming they arrested people about to carry out a terrorist attack, BRAVO!


The most interesting portion to me is the email I received a two weeks ago that I didn't report publicly at the time:

From: XXXXX@optusnet.com.au
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:02 AM
To: joeh@boomershoot.org
Subject: HELP!!!!

hello, i was just on ur website and me and a friend want a bomb big enough to blow up a car or anything along those lines of how big the thing is we want to blow up can u please help us? if u can can u please send me what i will need and how i go about making the bomb? thnx from grim.
 
I didn't reply.  But I did respond:

From: Joe Huffman [mailto:joeh@boomershoot.org]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:23 AM
To: 'webteam@mfbb.vic.gov.au'
Subject: I need contact info for the Melbourne Australia police.


I received the following email and need to forward it on to the appropriate people.  The IP address of the sender indicates they are in Melbourne.  Can you help?

Joe Huffman
Moscow, Idaho, USA
Voice: 208-301-4254

[snip]

On 10/24/05, osac@joehuffman.org <osac@joehuffman.org> wrote:
The following message was sent from  http://www.ds-osac.org on 24 Oct 2005

I received the following email and need to forward it on to the 
appropriate people.  The IP address of the sender indicates they are 
in Melbourne Australia.  Can you help?



Joe Huffman
Moscow, Idaho
Email: osac@joehuffman.org
Voice: 208-301-4254

[snip]

I received replies:

From: OSAC Feedback
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 9:24 AM
To: XXXX@joehuffman.org
Subject: Re: I need contact info for the Melbourne Australia police.


Dear Mr. Huffman:

Thank you for your interest in the U.S. Department of State's Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC).

In response to your e-mail message, the information has been forwarded to the appropriate authorites.

Thank you for your concerns.
Sincerely,
Marsha Thurman
Overseas Security Advisory Council
Bureau of Diplomatic Security
U.S. Department of State

 

From: PANTAZI, Angelique
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 6:41 PM
To: Joe Huffman
Subject: RE: I need contact info for the Melbourne Australia police.

 

Hello Joe

Thank you for sending through this email.  I have forwarded it to our Commander of Emergency Management.

Kind regards

Angie

Angie Pantazi
PR/Events Co-ordinator
Metropolitan Fire Brigade
456 Albert St
EAST MELBOURNE VIC  3002

Tel: (03) 9665 4394
Mob: 0400 919 778
Email: [deleted]
www.mfb.org.au

The chances are slim that I had much, if anything, to do with the arrests, but the chance does exist.

Joe Huffman  Monday, November 07, 2005 3:08:16 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
From a LA Times article:
Kappe likens it to the no-smoking movement: "Community by community, you restrict access without banning it. And finally, the Legislature takes notice."

We lost a lot of ground in the last few decades in our battle for freedom and not just 2nd Amendment related freedoms either. Recently we have been making some progress on the 2nd Amendment front but it's a tough fight. Learning from our enemies successes is a useful endeavor. We can learn how to defeat their game plan as well as how to adapt their winning tactics to our own agenda. Reading the profiles of their warriors is instructive.

The warrior Kappe is talking about above, Sayre Weaver, is a smart, dedicated, activist with a specialized skill useful to their fight. There isn't a multi-million member organization behind her. She is essentially a one person war machine. She has approached her fight against freedom by chipping away at it pieced by piece. She is winning one small skirmish at a time and gradually marginalizing access to and the use of firearms. We can do the same in the reverse direction. For example; get the attention of the press with your wholesome shooting events.

I suspect it was this coverage of one of my shooting events that caused so much alarm by some anti-freedom bigot they conspired to get me fired from my previous job. If it causes them so much pain they are willing to risk committing felonies to stop you then you know are being effective.

We have some momentum now, lets learn from our enemies successes, learn from our succeses, and let's keep it moving. She is just one person and is making a big difference. You too can make a big difference.

Joe Huffman  Monday, November 07, 2005 11:30:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

It says something, I think, that Muslims are trying to do what the Nazis refused to.

The Gun Guy
Regarding the current unpleasantness in France--after a short history lesson on the Nazi occupation of and withdrawal from Paris.

Joe Huffman  Monday, November 07, 2005 7:45:40 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Sunday, November 06, 2005
From Times Online (UK) regarding France:

11 NIGHTS OF VIOLENCE
15 CITIES AFFECTED
900 ARRESTS
4000 VEHICLES BURNT
2,300 ADDITIONAL POLICE ON PATROL

4000 vehicles burned!  1300 of those on Saturday night.  Who is doing this?

... rioting by youths, mainly of Arab and African origin

Can you say "Muslim"?  Nope, I didn't think you could.  But this is the line that really gets me:

The violence is widely blamed on the harsh rhetoric and tactics of Nicolas Sarkozy, the Interior Minister and UMP leader.

And just what is the proper response?  They don't say.  They don't want to have to admit it.  We have to destroy their extremist culture.

Joe Huffman  Sunday, November 06, 2005 10:04:05 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [7]  | 

What typically gets lost, and lost deliberately, is the meaning of the word 'compromise'. In a compromise, both sides gain or lose bargaining points in a mutually acceptable, if not optimal fashion.  In the gun control debate, the meaning of compromise is twisted to, "Okay, we'll only take half your guns, this time." The pro-RKBA folks are never even offered anything in return. This is a variation of the slippery slope that I call "Zeno's Paradox of Lost Rights". As with the paradox of motion, the remaining scope of the Second Amendment is progressively halved, and halved again. The illusion is that we never lose the right, because there is always the remaining half. The Theory of Limits suggests otherwise.
    
Sean Flynn
6/15/98

Joe Huffman  Sunday, November 06, 2005 8:53:08 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Saturday, November 05, 2005

Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor liberty to purchase power.

Benjamin Franklin

Joe Huffman  Saturday, November 05, 2005 8:48:37 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Friday, November 04, 2005

I would have never expected to see things like this said in the New York Times about gun control:

"This is putting a Band-Aid on heart surgery," said Gary P. Delagnes, president of the San Francisco Police Officer's Association. He called it another "silly idea" from elected officials whose progressive ideas are not grounded in the realities of fighting crime.

...

"This is a triumph of symbolic politics," said Franklin E. Zimring, at professor at the University of California at Berkeley Boalt School of Law, deeming the ordinance a "sure loser" in state court. Both daily newspapers in the city, the San Francisco Chronicle and the Examiner, cited the likelihood of a successful legal challenge as one key reason they recommend voters reject the measure.

Mayor Gavin Newsom, citing the likelihood of a successful court challenge, said he hasn't bothered to take a position on the measure. "It's a symbolic gesture," Mayor Newsom said. "It's a public opinion poll."

Wow!  I must be hallucinating from eating too much Halloween candy or something.

Joe Huffman  Friday, November 04, 2005 8:38:45 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

While in the Seattle area the last few days I listened to talk radio some.  Last night on my way out of town I was listening to John Carlson.  He got to it in a roundabout way but what came out was the shocking revelation that Washington State Department of Transportation has been changing the traffic lights on major intersections to make traffic far worse than it would if the traffic lights were set correctly.  By giving priority to the minor streets the major streets end up with restricted traffic flow.  One of the callers claimed he had been told by DOT workers that they do that in the days and weeks prior to a vote on increasing taxes for DOT use.  The objective is to make traffic worse so the voters will think increasing taxes for road construction isn't such a bad idea.

There's probably no law against doing that but images of tar, feathers, and rails keep appearing in my mind.

Joe Huffman  Friday, November 04, 2005 8:30:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

Ry has been posting about it since Tuesday but it wasn't until tonight that I saw anything in the mainstream (New York Times) about it.  Michelle Malkin has been all over it though (here and here).  I find it amusing in a sad, sick sort of manner the way the NYT talks about it:

France's worst urban violence in a decade exploded for a ninth night on Friday as bands of youths roamed the immigrant-heavy, working-class suburbs of Paris, setting fire to dozens of cars and buildings as the government struggled over the violence and the underlying frustrations fueling it.

The unrest, which has also spread to other parts of France with large North African and Arab populations, prompted the American and Russian governments to warn citizens visiting Paris to avoid its poor, outlying neighborhoods. France reduced train service to Charles de Gaulle Airport after two trains became targets of rioters earlier in the week.

Look at the words they use to describe the rioters: "North African", "Arab", "bands of youths".  It not until near the end of the article they dare to hint at reality:

While the vast majority of the young people behind the nightly attacks are Muslim, experts and residents warned against seeing the violence through the prism of religion. The cultural divide between these second- and third-generation immigrants and the native French is deeper because they come from Muslim families, but to date the violence has had nothing to do with Islam.

The cultural divide is because of Islam.  Islam calls for the death of anyone that leaves the faith.  Islam calls for non-Muslims to be subservient to Muslims.  Islam calls for the death of all Jews.  Until this extremist culture is destroyed they will be at war with us.  The French have an "interesting" situation on their hands.  How they deal with it and the results will have valuable lessons for all of us.

Joe Huffman  Friday, November 04, 2005 8:20:43 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

I was originally scheduled to start work this morning.  But due to some paperwork not getting to me days later than it should have been certain things weren't ready.  The company I am contracting through told me yesterday, "It's just not going to happen until next week.  Go home and we'll give you a call a day or so before you start."  Okay, fine.  I get to spend an extra day with my family and I get to go to teacher conferences with Xenia.  During the middle of the teacher conferences I get a call from the company I'm going to be working for, "Where you supposed to be here for orientation this morning?"  The contracting company apparently didn't tell them they didn't have all the paperwork done yet.  I didn't even know to who or where I was supposed to report to thus I had no way of informing them.

I think it's all straightened out, but it's still embarrassing and painful.  And I still don't know when I actually start work.

Joe Huffman  Friday, November 04, 2005 7:24:47 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
Bravo for John Lott's revealing research on the impact that concealed carry laws are having on crime. That such laws have been passed in 31 states, coinciding with passage of "Three Strikes" and "Hard Time for Armed Crime" legislation, is the real reason we are seeing a decline in reported violent crime. Those who have advocated restrictive gun control over the years, and other intrusions on the rights of individual citizens, are now being shown as the liars they've always been. In the wake of the Arkansas tragedy, I remain more firmly convinced than ever that gun control advocates are glad such shooting rampages to occur, simply in order to further their own agenda. The veneer is wearing thin, however, as from your own USA Today polling, the majority of respondents support gun ownership, and are now rejecting arguments that restrictions on our Constitutional rights will control crime.
   
Dave Workman
3/28/98
From http://www.intellectualcapital.com/issues/98/0326/icpro.asp (Link appears to be dead now)
Joe Huffman  Friday, November 04, 2005 9:24:09 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Thursday, November 03, 2005

Three weeks ago I reported on the arrest of Shaun Kranish for wearing a pro-Second Amendment jacket.  Stephanie has pointed out there are more details available now.  This part interests me:

When asked if I had any weapons, I informed him that I did not, as he could plainly see. After Chief Drought frisked me to verify that was the case, i.e., that I was unarmed and defenseless, as school policy stipulates, we were able to continue our conversation. I began expressing my concern about the policy and explained how it puts the students at serious risk. We spoke about the Constitution and the right to keep and bear arms. I informed them of the organization I started, and we talked a bit about the laws in Illinois. Both officers claimed many times to agree with my views and claimed to share my beliefs. At one point in the waiting room, I was about to quote Thomas Jefferson, when Chief Drought said I didn’t need to, as he knew all of the quotes as well. This seemed encouraging to me – a knowledgeable and informed law enforcement officer that believes in freedom.

The Chief then asked me to come in the back, so we wouldn’t have to speak in the waiting room. He led me into a room, shut the door, and we sat down and talked some more. I don’t remember the specifics of our conversation, but I think it was still centered around what I thought were the beliefs we shared. At some point, he told me he had some other things to do and that Officer Crumb would be taking over. Officer Crumb came in the room, and we talked some more. I could tell he was a very haughty man by his attitude and demeanor. He would constantly patronize me with agreeing confirmations and quirky smiles, but this didn’t bother me. To each his own – I was perfectly satisfied in discussing my beliefs.

The guy goes to the campus police station to discuss school policy on firearms and in order to continue the conversation he has to consent to being frisked.  I think the conversation should have been terminated then.  He is being asked to give up his Fourth amendment rights to exercise his First Amendment rights of discussing his Second Amendment rights.  I can't see things getting any better here--and they don't.

The other interesting thing is that the Gestapo claimed to share Kranish's view of the Second Amendment and the illegality of Illinois law and campus regulation.  I would have to review some of my books, but I'm pretty sure this is a standard interrogation technique.  The interrogator establishes a rapport with the person being questioned and they open up and confess without even realizing that is what they are doing.  An example would be interrogating a wife beater the cop would say something like, "There are times when my woman gets out of line.  I haven't hit her yet, but one of these days I know I'm going to.  She needs it.  She needs to understand who's wears the pants in the family.  So what does your old lady do that just pisses you off?  How do you keep her in her place?"

Keep in mind that while in a conversation with the police you are required to be truthful and they are not required to be truthful with you.  While engaged in a discussion with the police of a repressive government such Illinois, New Jersey, California, etc. you should be even more wary than usual.  Kranish is an example for all of us.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:06:53 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

Aristocrat:  A democrat with his pockets full

Josh Billings

Joe Huffman  Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:10:55 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Radicals who would take us back to the roots of things often fail because they disregard the fruit Time has produced and preserved.  Conservatives fail because they would preserve even what Time has decomposed.

Louis D. Brandeis

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, November 02, 2005 5:11:41 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
# Tuesday, November 01, 2005

I now have a place to stay in the Seattle area for my new job.  The KING 5 Evening Magazine video of Boomershoot didn't scare them off ("Sounds like fun") so I'm happy.  It's not quite as close as I would have liked but it's close enough and the price was right.  I have a big room with a fireplace.  A hot tub will be installed just out the back door soon.  I move in on Monday.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:16:10 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Those who made and endorsed our Constitution knew man's nature, and it is to their ideas, rather than to the temptations of utopia, that we must ask that our judges adhere.

Robert Bork
The Tempting of America

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, November 01, 2005 8:23:24 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Monday, October 31, 2005

All updates on Jason are on this blog: http://ltjason.blogspot.com.

Joe Huffman  Monday, October 31, 2005 11:38:09 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

This morning I finished cleaning my heavy barreled AR-15 and then cleaned my .300 Win Mag. It was raining but was supposed to stop by midday where I was headed (they were wrong). I packed up my rain gear (a poncho), gun gear, hunting knife, computer, some food, and water. I had to mail some stuff to one of my lawyers and finally got out of town a little after noon. I arrived at the Boomershoot site a little after 13:00. I walked from near the 380 yard line to the Taj Mahal about a quarter mile away taking about 1.5 hours going slowly around the area, nearly twice, in opposite directions. I expected to find a deer in the tall grass or under a tree where I had seen two deer before. Lyle and his son and I had seen three deer about two weeks ago. No such luck today. I got soaking wet from the knees down. I did a little work at the Taj Mahal and dried out a little bit. I didn't warm up any though. After an hour or so I left and as I drove south over the hill toward South Road on Meridian Road I saw two deer. One was stopped looking at me from about 100 yards away. I stopped and watched as the first one ran away and the other just stared at me. It was on land I didn't have permission to hunt on. On the other side of the road was more land I didn't have permission to hunt on. If it crossed the road I couldn't shoot it while it was on the road. It was safe from me for over 400 yards in any direction. I drove on and it ran away as I got closer.

I was cold and damp and was enjoying the warmth of the van. I decided to do some "road hunting." I would drive around for a while and see if I could see anything from the roads on any of the land I had permission to hunt on. I drove slowly north into a field we call "The 120". Nothing. I turned around and slowly drove back out to the main road. I drove east on South Road and then north on Newman Road. I turned west into another field where Lyle, his son, and I waited for dusk and deer to appear before. Last time dusk and then darkness had arrived without any deer.

About 16:00 I parked and set up to wait for dusk and the hoped for deer. An aerial image of the location is here. The top strip of green is trees and brush. Just to the south (down) is my parents land. In the middle of the picture, going north-south, is a strip of grass in a draw. It is called a grass waterway. I had parked my van just south of where the grass waterway bends to the east. Using the van for shelter from the breeze and the rain I setup and waited. I fired up my computer and used the hot air from the fan to dry the ocular lens that had water drops on it. I checked temperature, 46 F, and the barometric indicated altitude--3000 feet above sea level. I put the information into Modern Ballistics and used the laser range finder to get distances to the nearest trees and various landmarks in the grass waterway. I set the scope angle to an indicated 5.75 MOA. Using the 180 grain Federal Power-Shok cartridges for my .300 Win Mag that would give me a zero of 234 yards and a point blank range of 273 yards with a point blank size of 4.8 inches. The nearest trees were about 270 yards. Anything my side of the trees could be hit within 2.4 inches of my point of aim without adjusting for elevation--assuming perfect ammo, gun, and shooter. None of those were perfect but from 200 to 260 yards the point of impact should be +/- 1.4 inches assuming everything is perfect. The deer, almost for certain, would be within that range if it appeared.

At 16:40 my daughter Kim called to discuss snow tires for her car. I chatted for a while then saw two deer walk out of the woods and stroll slowly to the east. I told Kim, "I'm out hunting and I just saw two deer come out of the woods. I want to shoot them now." We said good-bye and I turned my attention to the deer. The deer were together in the center of the grass waterway having just come out of the woods. My laser range finder said I was 255 yards from the lead deer which was broadside to me and a better target. I was aiming just ahead of the shoulder as it was walking into the shot. The gun went off without a conscious thought from me--IPSC does that to you. In IPSC when I'm doing things right I find that as the sights are aligned on the target the gun goes boom without me knowing it was going to happen--even when it's happening three times a second. Just as I pulled the trigger the deer stopped and put it's head down to eat. In the 0.3 seconds the bullet took to reach it's target the deer would have put it's heart into the path of the bullet. But because it was stopped the bullet got it's spine instead of the heart and lungs--we both got lucky. It would be hard to get a cleaner, quicker death than a completely severed spine between it's head and heart. I got an easier job of cleaning the chest cavity and have more eatable meat.


The untouched deer after being shot. Click for a larger image, then click again for still larger.

Another example for doubters of Myth Busters. The deer fell toward the shooter (actually it turned 90 degrees toward me then fell over so the long axis of it's body was aligned with me). You are looking at the exit wound side of the deer. It did not get pushed or knocked down by the bullet impact. It's spine was severed and whatever muscle twitches remained caused it's only motion as it crumpled to the ground.

The other deer jumped and ran a few steps before stopping and looking in my direction. I wondered at first if I had missed and this was the deer I had shot at. I looked closely through the scope and could see the white from the belly of the deer I had shot. It was motionless. I quickly packed up enough to drive to the downed deer. The still standing deer didn't run away until I had started up and was moving toward it.

I parked the van next to the deer and started cutting on it. I then called Doug to tell him and hoped he would volunteer to come help. He did. When he and his son Brad arrived about 10 minutes later it was getting dark and it was still raining. I was doing this for the first time and progress was slow for me before Doug arrived. Doug brought a hatchet that we used to break open the pelvis and the sternum. After tagging it and emptying the body cavity we put it on the tarp in my van and drove back to his place to skin it while hanging up in the machine shed.

I called Kim back after the gutted deer was in the van and on the way to the shed for skinning. She asked if she was still going to get some of the meat. I told her, "Of course". After talking to Kim I called Xenia and told her I would be home a little late because I had got my deer.

In the shed we had artificial lights, a roof over our heads, and equipment to hoist the deer up to chest height for easy skinning. 1.5 hours after I took the shot it was gutted, skinned, and wrapped in a tarp in my van.

I went inside to visit with my parents and clean up a little. I wore plastic gloves and my poncho while working with the deer so I didn't get much blood on me. I just had to clean my knives and a little bit blood from one sleeve of my shirt. Mom fixed me a peanut butter, jelly, and lettuce sandwich and gave me a glass of milk for my supper. I left my parents place at 18:30 and was home, parked in the driveway with the carcass of a white-tailed deer in my van by 19:30. Tomorrow it will go to the meat cutter who will age it, then cut, and wrap the meat.

Interesting coincidences--I have harvested (using Barb's Jeep rather than my rifle) only one other deer before. It also was on Halloween and just seconds prior to downing it I got a call on my cell phone. That time I was on the phone talking to Barb when the deer jumped out in front of me and the impact caused compound fractures in both it's hind legs. I killed it with my pistol and again Doug came to field dress it.

Doug asked me if I got sick to my stomach as I pulled the trigger. He still does sometimes. Other people get very excited and can't shoot worth a darn when a deer gets into their sights. I didn't feel any excitement or sickness--just the recoil of the rifle on my shoulder. There was no particular joy or sadness either. Just another four legged, crop eating pest was dead and I would have some meat to share with my children over the next few months.

More pictures from my first hunting season are here. Tomorrow, after the light is better, I plan to update the photo album with pictures of the entrance and exit wounds.

Update: I took the deer to the meat processor Tuesday morning. While on the scales with head and legs still attached it weighed 79 pounds. The photo album has been updated with pictures of the entrance and exit wounds.

Update2: Information on whitetailed deer. Also of interest is that in Clearwater county, where this deer was harvested, a collision with a deer is the most common form of car accident.

Joe Huffman  Monday, October 31, 2005 11:29:31 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  |