Sunday, November 06, 2005

What typically gets lost, and lost deliberately, is the meaning of the word 'compromise'. In a compromise, both sides gain or lose bargaining points in a mutually acceptable, if not optimal fashion.  In the gun control debate, the meaning of compromise is twisted to, "Okay, we'll only take half your guns, this time." The pro-RKBA folks are never even offered anything in return. This is a variation of the slippery slope that I call "Zeno's Paradox of Lost Rights". As with the paradox of motion, the remaining scope of the Second Amendment is progressively halved, and halved again. The illusion is that we never lose the right, because there is always the remaining half. The Theory of Limits suggests otherwise.
    
Sean Flynn
6/15/98

Joe Huffman  Sunday, November 06, 2005 8:53:08 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Saturday, November 05, 2005

Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor liberty to purchase power.

Benjamin Franklin

Joe Huffman  Saturday, November 05, 2005 8:48:37 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Friday, November 04, 2005

I would have never expected to see things like this said in the New York Times about gun control:

"This is putting a Band-Aid on heart surgery," said Gary P. Delagnes, president of the San Francisco Police Officer's Association. He called it another "silly idea" from elected officials whose progressive ideas are not grounded in the realities of fighting crime.

...

"This is a triumph of symbolic politics," said Franklin E. Zimring, at professor at the University of California at Berkeley Boalt School of Law, deeming the ordinance a "sure loser" in state court. Both daily newspapers in the city, the San Francisco Chronicle and the Examiner, cited the likelihood of a successful legal challenge as one key reason they recommend voters reject the measure.

Mayor Gavin Newsom, citing the likelihood of a successful court challenge, said he hasn't bothered to take a position on the measure. "It's a symbolic gesture," Mayor Newsom said. "It's a public opinion poll."

Wow!  I must be hallucinating from eating too much Halloween candy or something.

Joe Huffman  Friday, November 04, 2005 8:38:45 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

While in the Seattle area the last few days I listened to talk radio some.  Last night on my way out of town I was listening to John Carlson.  He got to it in a roundabout way but what came out was the shocking revelation that Washington State Department of Transportation has been changing the traffic lights on major intersections to make traffic far worse than it would if the traffic lights were set correctly.  By giving priority to the minor streets the major streets end up with restricted traffic flow.  One of the callers claimed he had been told by DOT workers that they do that in the days and weeks prior to a vote on increasing taxes for DOT use.  The objective is to make traffic worse so the voters will think increasing taxes for road construction isn't such a bad idea.

There's probably no law against doing that but images of tar, feathers, and rails keep appearing in my mind.

Joe Huffman  Friday, November 04, 2005 8:30:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

Ry has been posting about it since Tuesday but it wasn't until tonight that I saw anything in the mainstream (New York Times) about it.  Michelle Malkin has been all over it though (here and here).  I find it amusing in a sad, sick sort of manner the way the NYT talks about it:

France's worst urban violence in a decade exploded for a ninth night on Friday as bands of youths roamed the immigrant-heavy, working-class suburbs of Paris, setting fire to dozens of cars and buildings as the government struggled over the violence and the underlying frustrations fueling it.

The unrest, which has also spread to other parts of France with large North African and Arab populations, prompted the American and Russian governments to warn citizens visiting Paris to avoid its poor, outlying neighborhoods. France reduced train service to Charles de Gaulle Airport after two trains became targets of rioters earlier in the week.

Look at the words they use to describe the rioters: "North African", "Arab", "bands of youths".  It not until near the end of the article they dare to hint at reality:

While the vast majority of the young people behind the nightly attacks are Muslim, experts and residents warned against seeing the violence through the prism of religion. The cultural divide between these second- and third-generation immigrants and the native French is deeper because they come from Muslim families, but to date the violence has had nothing to do with Islam.

The cultural divide is because of Islam.  Islam calls for the death of anyone that leaves the faith.  Islam calls for non-Muslims to be subservient to Muslims.  Islam calls for the death of all Jews.  Until this extremist culture is destroyed they will be at war with us.  The French have an "interesting" situation on their hands.  How they deal with it and the results will have valuable lessons for all of us.

Joe Huffman  Friday, November 04, 2005 8:20:43 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

I was originally scheduled to start work this morning.  But due to some paperwork not getting to me days later than it should have been certain things weren't ready.  The company I am contracting through told me yesterday, "It's just not going to happen until next week.  Go home and we'll give you a call a day or so before you start."  Okay, fine.  I get to spend an extra day with my family and I get to go to teacher conferences with Xenia.  During the middle of the teacher conferences I get a call from the company I'm going to be working for, "Where you supposed to be here for orientation this morning?"  The contracting company apparently didn't tell them they didn't have all the paperwork done yet.  I didn't even know to who or where I was supposed to report to thus I had no way of informing them.

I think it's all straightened out, but it's still embarrassing and painful.  And I still don't know when I actually start work.

Joe Huffman  Friday, November 04, 2005 7:24:47 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
Bravo for John Lott's revealing research on the impact that concealed carry laws are having on crime. That such laws have been passed in 31 states, coinciding with passage of "Three Strikes" and "Hard Time for Armed Crime" legislation, is the real reason we are seeing a decline in reported violent crime. Those who have advocated restrictive gun control over the years, and other intrusions on the rights of individual citizens, are now being shown as the liars they've always been. In the wake of the Arkansas tragedy, I remain more firmly convinced than ever that gun control advocates are glad such shooting rampages to occur, simply in order to further their own agenda. The veneer is wearing thin, however, as from your own USA Today polling, the majority of respondents support gun ownership, and are now rejecting arguments that restrictions on our Constitutional rights will control crime.
   
Dave Workman
3/28/98
From http://www.intellectualcapital.com/issues/98/0326/icpro.asp (Link appears to be dead now)
Joe Huffman  Friday, November 04, 2005 9:24:09 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Thursday, November 03, 2005

Three weeks ago I reported on the arrest of Shaun Kranish for wearing a pro-Second Amendment jacket.  Stephanie has pointed out there are more details available now.  This part interests me:

When asked if I had any weapons, I informed him that I did not, as he could plainly see. After Chief Drought frisked me to verify that was the case, i.e., that I was unarmed and defenseless, as school policy stipulates, we were able to continue our conversation. I began expressing my concern about the policy and explained how it puts the students at serious risk. We spoke about the Constitution and the right to keep and bear arms. I informed them of the organization I started, and we talked a bit about the laws in Illinois. Both officers claimed many times to agree with my views and claimed to share my beliefs. At one point in the waiting room, I was about to quote Thomas Jefferson, when Chief Drought said I didn’t need to, as he knew all of the quotes as well. This seemed encouraging to me – a knowledgeable and informed law enforcement officer that believes in freedom.

The Chief then asked me to come in the back, so we wouldn’t have to speak in the waiting room. He led me into a room, shut the door, and we sat down and talked some more. I don’t remember the specifics of our conversation, but I think it was still centered around what I thought were the beliefs we shared. At some point, he told me he had some other things to do and that Officer Crumb would be taking over. Officer Crumb came in the room, and we talked some more. I could tell he was a very haughty man by his attitude and demeanor. He would constantly patronize me with agreeing confirmations and quirky smiles, but this didn’t bother me. To each his own – I was perfectly satisfied in discussing my beliefs.

The guy goes to the campus police station to discuss school policy on firearms and in order to continue the conversation he has to consent to being frisked.  I think the conversation should have been terminated then.  He is being asked to give up his Fourth amendment rights to exercise his First Amendment rights of discussing his Second Amendment rights.  I can't see things getting any better here--and they don't.

The other interesting thing is that the Gestapo claimed to share Kranish's view of the Second Amendment and the illegality of Illinois law and campus regulation.  I would have to review some of my books, but I'm pretty sure this is a standard interrogation technique.  The interrogator establishes a rapport with the person being questioned and they open up and confess without even realizing that is what they are doing.  An example would be interrogating a wife beater the cop would say something like, "There are times when my woman gets out of line.  I haven't hit her yet, but one of these days I know I'm going to.  She needs it.  She needs to understand who's wears the pants in the family.  So what does your old lady do that just pisses you off?  How do you keep her in her place?"

Keep in mind that while in a conversation with the police you are required to be truthful and they are not required to be truthful with you.  While engaged in a discussion with the police of a repressive government such Illinois, New Jersey, California, etc. you should be even more wary than usual.  Kranish is an example for all of us.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:06:53 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

Aristocrat:  A democrat with his pockets full

Josh Billings

Joe Huffman  Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:10:55 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Radicals who would take us back to the roots of things often fail because they disregard the fruit Time has produced and preserved.  Conservatives fail because they would preserve even what Time has decomposed.

Louis D. Brandeis

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, November 02, 2005 5:11:41 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Tuesday, November 01, 2005

I now have a place to stay in the Seattle area for my new job.  The KING 5 Evening Magazine video of Boomershoot didn't scare them off ("Sounds like fun") so I'm happy.  It's not quite as close as I would have liked but it's close enough and the price was right.  I have a big room with a fireplace.  A hot tub will be installed just out the back door soon.  I move in on Monday.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:16:10 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Those who made and endorsed our Constitution knew man's nature, and it is to their ideas, rather than to the temptations of utopia, that we must ask that our judges adhere.

Robert Bork
The Tempting of America

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, November 01, 2005 8:23:24 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Monday, October 31, 2005

All updates on Jason are on this blog: http://ltjason.blogspot.com.

Joe Huffman  Monday, October 31, 2005 11:38:09 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

This morning I finished cleaning my heavy barreled AR-15 and then cleaned my .300 Win Mag.  It was raining but was supposed to stop by midday where I was headed (they were wrong).  I packed up my rain gear (a poncho), gun gear, hunting knife, computer, some food, and water.  I had to mail some stuff to one of my lawyers and finally got out of town a little after noon.  I arrived at the Boomershoot site a little after 13:00.  I walked from near the 380 yard line to the Taj Mahal about a quarter mile away taking about 1.5 hours going slowly around the area, nearly twice, in opposite directions.  I expected to find a deer in the tall grass or under a tree where I had seen two deer before.  Lyle and his son and I had seen three deer about two weeks ago.  No such luck today.  I got soaking wet from the knees down.  I did a little work at the Taj Mahal and dried out a little bit.  I didn't warm up any though.  After an hour or so I left and as I drove south over the hill toward South Road on Meridian Road I saw two deer.  One was stopped looking at me from about 100 yards away.  I stopped and watched as the first one ran away and the other just stared at me.  It was on land I didn't have permission to hunt on.  On the other side of the road was more land I didn't have permission to hunt on.  If it crossed the road I couldn't shoot it while it was on the road.  It was safe from me for over 400 yards in any direction.  I drove on and it ran away as I got closer.

I was cold and damp and was enjoying the warmth of the van.  I decided to do some "road hunting."  I would drive around for a while and see if I could see anything from the roads on any of the land I had permission to hunt on.   I drove slowly north into a field we call "The 120".  Nothing.  I turned around and slowly drove back out to the main road.  I drove east on South Road and then north on Newman Road.  I turned west into another field where Lyle, his son, and I waited for dusk and deer to appear before.  Last time dusk and then darkness had arrived without any deer.

About 16:00 I parked and set up to wait for dusk and the hoped for deer.  An aerial image of the location is here.  The top strip of green is trees and brush.  Just to the south (down) is my parents land.  In the middle of the picture, going north-south, is a strip of grass in a draw.  It is called a grass waterway.  I had parked my van just south of where the grass waterway bends to the east.  Using the van for shelter from the breeze and the rain I setup and waited.  I fired up my computer and used the hot air from the fan to dry the ocular lens that had water drops on it.  I checked temperature, 46 F, and the barometric indicated altitude--3000 feet above sea level.  I put the information into Modern Ballistics and used the laser range finder to get distances to the nearest trees and various landmarks in the grass waterway.  I set the scope angle to an indicated 5.75 MOA.  Using the 180 grain Federal Power-Shok cartridges for my .300 Win Mag that would give me a zero of 234 yards and a point blank range of 273 yards with a point blank size of 4.8 inches.  The nearest trees were about 270 yards.  Anything my side of the trees could be hit within 2.4 inches of my point of aim without adjusting for elevation--assuming perfect ammo, gun, and shooter.  None of those were perfect but from 200 to 260 yards the point of impact should be +/- 1.4 inches assuming everything is perfect.  The deer, almost for certain, would be within that range if it appeared.

At 16:40 my daughter Kim called to discuss snow tires for her car.  I chatted for a while then saw two deer walk out of the woods and stroll slowly to the east.  I told Kim, "I'm out hunting and I just saw two deer come out of the woods.  I want to shoot them now."  We said good-bye and I turned my attention to the deer.  The deer were together in the center of the grass waterway having just come out of the woods.  My laser range finder said I was 255 yards from the lead deer which was broadside to me and a better target.  I was aiming just ahead of the shoulder as it was walking into the shot. The gun went off without a conscious thought from me--IPSC does that to you. In IPSC when I'm doing things right I find that as the sights are aligned on the target the gun goes boom without me knowing it was going to happen--even when it's happening three times a second. Just as I pulled the trigger the deer stopped and put it's head down to eat.  In the 0.3 seconds the bullet took to reach it's target the deer would have put it's heart into the path of the bullet.  But because it was stopped the bullet got it's spine instead of the heart and lungs--we both got lucky. It would be hard to get a cleaner, quicker death than a completely severed spine between it's head and heart.  I got an easier job of cleaning the chest cavity and have more eatable meat.


The untouched deer after being shot.  Click for a larger image, then click again for still larger.

Another example for doubters of Myth Busters.  The deer fell toward the shooter (actually it turned 90 degrees toward me then fell over so the long axis of it's body was aligned with me).  You are looking at the exit wound side of the deer.  It did not get pushed or knocked down by the bullet impact.  It's spine was severed and whatever muscle twitches remained caused it's only motion as it crumpled to the ground.

The other deer jumped and ran a few steps before stopping and looking in my direction.  I wondered at first if I had missed and this was the deer I had shot at.  I looked closely through the scope and could see the white from the belly of the deer I had shot.  It was motionless.  I quickly packed up enough to drive to the downed deer.  The still standing deer didn't run away until I had started up and was moving toward it.

I parked the van next to the deer and started cutting on it.  I then called Doug to tell him and hoped he would volunteer to come help.  He did.  When he and his son Brad arrived about 10 minutes later it was getting dark and it was still raining.  I was doing this for the first time and progress was slow for me before Doug arrived.  Doug brought a hatchet that we used to break open the pelvis and the sternum.  After tagging it and emptying the body cavity we put it on the tarp in my van and drove back to his place to skin it while hanging up in the machine shed.

I called Kim back after the gutted deer was in the van and on the way to the shed for skinning.  She asked if she was still going to get some of the meat.  I told her, "Of course".  After talking to Kim I called Xenia and told her I would be home a little late because I had got my deer.

In the shed we had artificial lights, a roof over our heads, and equipment to hoist the deer up to chest height for easy skinning.  1.5 hours after I took the shot it was gutted, skinned, and wrapped in a tarp in my van.

I went inside to visit with my parents and clean up a little.  I wore plastic gloves and my poncho while working with the deer so I didn't get much blood on me.  I just had to clean my knives and a little bit blood from one sleeve of my shirt.  Mom fixed me a peanut butter, jelly, and lettuce sandwich and gave me a glass of milk for my supper.  I left my parents place at 18:30 and was home, parked in the driveway with the carcass of a white-tailed deer in my van by 19:30.  Tomorrow it will go to the meat cutter who will age it, then cut, and wrap the meat.

Interesting coincidences--I have harvested (using Barb's Jeep rather than my rifle) only one other deer before.  It also was on Halloween and just seconds prior to downing it I got a call on my cell phone.  That time I was on the phone talking to Barb when the deer jumped out in front of me and the impact caused compound fractures in both it's hind legs.  I killed it with my pistol and again Doug came to field dress it.

Doug asked me if I got sick to my stomach as I pulled the trigger.  He still does sometimes.  Other people get very excited and can't shoot worth a darn when a deer gets into their sights.  I didn't feel any excitement or sickness--just the recoil of the rifle on my shoulder.  There was no particular joy or sadness either.  Just another four legged, crop eating pest was dead and I would have some meat to share with my children over the next few months.

More pictures from my first hunting season are here.  Tomorrow, after the light is better, I plan to update the photo album with pictures of the entrance and exit wounds.

Update: I took the deer to the meat processor Tuesday morning.  While on the scales with head and legs still attached it weighed 79 pounds.  The photo album has been updated with pictures of the entrance and exit wounds.

Update2: Information on whitetailed deer.  Also of interest is that in Clearwater county, where this deer was harvested, a collision with a deer is the most common form of car accident.

Joe Huffman  Monday, October 31, 2005 11:29:31 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  | 

Walter Gaya was one of the Boomershoot Precision Rifle Clinic Instructors in 2004. His best friend Adam, also a Boomershoot instructor, was killed last February in Iraq.  Walter was seriously injured in July.  Now Walter is in the news again.

As Barb said, "That stinks.  That's just so wrong."

Please do what you can.

Update: The news is that things seem to be under control now.  Thanks everyone.

Joe Huffman  Monday, October 31, 2005 8:54:39 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.

Justice Robert H. Jackson

Joe Huffman  Monday, October 31, 2005 5:59:31 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Sunday, October 30, 2005

I've put the Lewiston Pistol Club October Steel match results on the web.  I came in second this time.  Much better than in August.  Practice makes a difference.

There are a few pictures there as well.

Joe Huffman  Sunday, October 30, 2005 10:35:35 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Sorry for the lack of postings lately.  Here is what I have been doing for the last couple of days that has kept me away from the computer.

Most of the day Thursday I was looking at apartments and roommate situations after having lunch with some friends at Dixie's Barbeque in Bellevue.  It was good to see Mike in good spirits and apparently healthy after his bicyle wreck which resulted in seven broken bones, a punctured lung, and other injuries.

Probably the most interesting potential roommate was the room in the basement of the owner of a house in Bellevue.  This is her business.  A professional matchmaker--who is single.  Another was a travel agent who was having some difficulties because of the hurricane that wiped out a Cancan resort where a big group of his had made reservations for late November.  His comment was "You know not to make reservations during hurricane season, but who would have thought the resort would be closed for two months after the end of the season?"  Then there was the potential roommate that said, "You can hunt all the coyotes you want from the backyard."  I would have had to watch out for:

...one llama, 2 alpaca, 3 angora goats, 1 jacob sheep, 9 indian runner ducks, 2 Cayuga ducks, 1 leonberger dog (who rarely comes inside, his job is guarding the flock/herd) and a personable, ancient cat that lives in the garage.

And those were just the animals outside the house.  I was tempted.  I grew up on a farm and it would have had some similarities to "home".  However the commute to work was a little farther than I really wanted and I turned them down.  I have one more potential roommate to check out on Tuesday when I arrive back in the area.

I finished the visit with the last potential roommate and left the Seattle area for the long drive home at 22:00.  I got into bed with Barb at 02:38.  Barb had Friday off and after she took Xenia to school we celebrated my new job by staying in bed all day.  No time for the computer except for the reaching over the side of the bed for the laptop long enough to post the Quote of the Day while Barb was getting us something to eat from the kitchen.

Yesterday after continuing our celebration in bed until mid morning Barb and I went to Lewiston for a walk along the levees and a visit to Costco.  Barb has been reading a book on Alford Hitchcock and we watched one of his early movies before going to bed early.  Which explains why I woke up early this morning.

One of my tasks for today is to create a blog for Jason's parents and other friends visiting him in Walter Reed to post information in.  That will be easier for them than making lots of phone calls and keeping lists of all the people than need to be on the To: line of the email.  Once I get that set up I'll post a link here too.

I've got lots of other things to do too.  Lots of stuff to take care of before I head back over for my new job.  I'll try to get in a gun related post soon.  The deadline for the latest postal rifle match is coming up soon and I still need to shoot it.  I'm thinking of going hunting, shooting the postal match, and working an the Taj Mahal tomorrow.  The Taj is in good shape now but I need to do inventory, check the battery charging system, and empty all the jugs of water (used for cleaning) before it freezes.  And if I have enough time I'll test some targets using the .223 at long range.

Joe Huffman  Sunday, October 30, 2005 5:28:51 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Congress shall have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American ....The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or the state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People.

Tench Coxe
Pennsylvania Gazette
Feb. 20, 1788.

Joe Huffman  Sunday, October 30, 2005 4:29:36 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |