Yeah, I know, so what else is new?

They report on the bill before the U.S. Senate to protect the gun industry from junk lawsuits.  They claim:

 In September, the families of victims in the sniper shootings in the Washington area won a $2.5 million settlement from the dealer who supplied the snipers' assault rifle.

Being generous to the reporter and editors, they are misleading when they say this.  The gun was stolen from the dealer by the two criminals.  Do they claim a bank that gets robbed provided money for the criminal to buy illegal drugs?

To give them credit where they deserve it, they did quote a spokesman for one of my Senators:

A spokesman for Senator Larry E. Craig, an Idaho Republican who sponsored the bill, said the lawsuits were inappropriate.

The suits "attempt to achieve gun control through judicial rather than the legislative means," said the spokesman, Sid Smith. "If a drunk driver hits someone," he said, "the car manufacturer is not held responsible so long as the car functioned correctly, so why should the gun industry be any different?"

Overall I give them a grade of 'C' on this article. In addition to the above blatant bias they only gave a few lines of coverage to the pro-freedom viewpoint and the vast majority to the anti-freedom viewpoint.

Man defends himself as much as he can against truth, as a child does against a medicine, as the man of the Platonic cave did against the light.  He does not willingly follow his path, but has to be dragged along backward.

Henri Frederic Amiel

Denise's comments here and the big story about CNN breaking Federal law to do an anti-freedom story on gun ownership reminds me of something I said a long time ago and remains true today:

Huffman's rule of firearms law: Firearms law are so complex, victimless, and nonsensical that almost every firearms owner breaks multiple laws without knowing it. A general rule to compute the earned prison time for crimes committed is to multiply the number of years of activity in the shooting sports by five.

Joe Huffman
(Who, if caught and convicted, would spend the rest of his life in prison)
12/16/97

As I reported before Adam was one of the Precision Rifle Clinic instructors at the last Boomershoot.  Rivrdog reports on his memorial service.

MSM reports:

Seattle Times
Seattle Times
The News Tribune
The News Tribune
KVAL News
Seattle PI
Seattle PI
KOMO TV
The Register Guard
KOIN News
The Oregonian
Bend.com
The Olympian
The Olympian
YubaNet

You can donate money to directly to the Lancer Memorial Fund which helps the families of those fallen in battle.  See near the bottom of this press release for more details.

Amazing.  The first time my blog is linked to by a really, really, high traffic blog and it's these people.

Someone has a tin foil hat on and quotes a news quote of mine rather than going directly to the source I gave.  <shrug> They are a few Fruit Loops short of a full bowl so what do you expect?

No, that wasn't a note.  That was an entire symphony.

Peter Zatloukal
When asked if that was a note of sarcasm in his voice.
3:00 PM, October 24, 2000

An ex-employee at the San Francisco International Airport claims the security people doing the passenger screening cheat to pass the tests by federal auditors.  Bruce Schneier writes about the necessity of having trusted people.  This is true.  What he doesn't point out is that in this case it's probably an unsolvable problem.  Security is no stronger than the weakest link.  When you have thousands of people you have to trust to ensure the “sterile area” of the air transportation system is secure the odds of having one or more untrustworthy people is asymtotically close to one.

The odds of getting weapons onboard a plane when the passenger makes no attempt to hide the weapon is about 20%.  When the auditors deliberately try to evade security they classify the test results.  My guess is the results approach a 100% failure rate.

It's time to consider alternatives.  Obtaining public acceptance of scientifically sound methods of security is a better position to be in than using publicly acceptable methods that can never succeed.

IMO there are to many stupid people in the world to waste any time worrying or complaining about them.

Greg Hamilton
11/11/2001
Insights Training Email List

Kim du Toit has a picture of a poster from a previous war entitled “What did you do today ... for freedom?“  It turns out I have been thinking about that a lot the last few days.  I just woke up a short while ago so I'll write about yesterday instead of today.

What did I do for freedom yesterday?  I reviewed proposals for some Navy money and voted on which should be given funding and which should be dropped this time.  Then I worked on a portion of a solution to plug a security hole in our computers. 

But I can't tell you how many times I think about Adam and wonder if there was a countermeasure for Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosives Devices (VBIEDs) that I should have thought of.  Without more details on what exactly happened to Adam I don't know if any of my ideas could have made any difference.  But I keep thinking maybe there was something more I should have done with the ideas I did have or were suggested to me.  I presented them and sold them as best I could to management last fall but they didn't go anywhere that I know of.  They could have been passed on to people better able to implement than I and classified--I just don't know.  But could I have followed up more and pushed harder?  Could I have gotten something implemented and deployed in time to have prevented Adams death?  Probably not.  But what about the next VBIED?  Is there one that next week or next month or next year that will kill or injury Walter or my nephew or a few years from now after my niece graduates from West Point?  Is there something I could have done or should do to prevent it?  What if I had found someone to give my information on people searching for bomb building information sooner?  Technically, it's not my job.  My job is with computer security.  I'm working to keep our computers and computer networks safe from attack.  Worthwhile endeavors in our fight to preserve our freedoms, but I often feel it's not as pressing as solving the simple brute force attacks used by our current adversaries.

What to do?  Do my job as best I can, keep thinking, and keep feeding ideas to those who's job it is to solve the immediate problems.  It's time to get ready for work.  Today and every day is important.

The problems of victory are more agreeable than the problems of defeat, but they are no less difficult.

Winston Churchill
Speech
House of Commons
11/11/42

The following is only very slightly edited from a class I took yesterday.  I think it's good advice for everyone.

We have become vulnerable everywhere because today's terrorist confronts the United States indirectly.  This tactic exploits our vulnerabilities and negates our superior tactical and strategic advantage.  The terrorists are looking for headlines, high mortality, and high shock value.  The reality is that the risk is now on our home front.  We no longer can assume we are safe in the continental United States; as demonstrated by September 11, 2001 terrorist events.  The terrorists are bringing the fight to us.

You can help CI by being aware of activities that are precursors of a terrorist event and may provide a warning that saves lives and property.  The fundamental indicator is unusual and suspicious activities.  We must all remain alert to possibilities that are virtually limited only by one's imagination.  We cannot accept the risk of complacency.  Our defense: unpredictability, situational awareness, patience, and vigilance.  Awareness, the eyes and voice of each individual, is critical to the success of the war against terrorism. 

A partial list of things worthy of additional attention:

• People near a facility using or carrying video cameras or observation equipment (for example night vision devices)
• People parking, standing or loitering over several days with no apparent reasonable explanation
• Suspicious vehicles, something that is not normal for the situation or area
• Unusual questioning about the facility or personal information
• Frequent telephone calls claiming to be wrong numbers
• Abandoned packages, briefcases, or suitcases
• Low-flying aircraft, possibly observing the area
• Any activity considered suspicious or unusual to you from what you normally observe.

Reliability in a handgun is extremely important.  If you point it at someone and all it does is go CLICK when you pull the trigger you don't have much leeway in talking your way out of the situation.  I mean, what are you going to say?  "I wasn't serious when I pulled the trigger?"

Eric Engstrom

Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.

Mao Tse-Tung, also Mao Zedung
Problems of War and Strategy, speech
6 Nov. 1938

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.

Albert Einstein

I just found out via Kim duToit that Adam Plumondore was killed in a car bomb explosion.  Adam and his co-worker Walter assisted Eugene Econ with the Precision Rifle Clinic last year. I had a few pictures that were taken by Ry and Michael of the Saturday night dinner during Boomershoot 2004 that I had never put up.  Some of those included pictures of Adam.  I put those up on my photo album a few minutes ago.  We all are saddened by this loss.

Update: See also this blog entry.
Update2: I found another picture and uploaded it here.

In a most pleasant change from normal I didn't have to drive 150 miles home after work Thursday or Friday.  Barb, Xenia, and Xenia's friend Sara drove over Thursday night to spend the weekend with me.  This saved me six hours of driving while still getting to be with my family for the weekend. 

I made pancakes yesterday morning for the girls and myself.  We had lunch at the Chinese buffet.  I got discount tickets at work and last night we went to see Finding Neverland. We all cried.  It was a great movie.  So here I sit, in bed, with Barb asleep beside me.  Life is good.

Ry and Stephanie are doing their part in our efforts to make people more comfortable with the recreational use of explosives and firearms.  Ebay seems like as good a place as any to reach the general population.

Thank you!

All our objectives are predicated on the belief that the interests of public safety demand a reduction in the availability and attractiveness of guns of all kinds.

1. Minimum age of 18 for the ownership, use and possession of all guns.
2. Ban on the sale, manufacture and import of imitation guns and their possession in a public place.
3. Certification of all deactivated weapons.
4. Inclusion of airguns in certification system.
5. One certification system for all legal weapons i.e. rifles, shotguns, airguns.
6. Multi-shot rifles and shotguns to be banned.
7. Practical or Combat shooting or any other shooting practice which involves the simulation of real life situations and/or the use of human shaped targets to be banned.
   Abolition or radical reconstitution of the Firearms Consultative Committee.

We recognise the existence of a significant minority interest in shooting for sport, and our proposals are aimed at striking an appropriate balance between the sport-shooting interest and the overriding interest in public safety.

Gun Control Network
Our Objectives as of February 19, 2005

Since emotions are few and reasons are many (said the robot, Giskard), the behaviour of a crowd can be more easily predicted than the behaviour of one person can.

Isaac Asimov