Monday, July 12, 2004

Piewacket, our 18 year-old cat, was gone for a couple days and came home Saturday night.  He was in bad shape.  He hasn't been well for some time but came home gaunt and limping.  He would drink but not eat.  Barb and Nancy took him to the vet today and had him “put to sleep“.

More vehicle problems too.  Barb's Jeep was barely running by the time she got to work today so she turned around and came back.  She made it back okay.  Martin's Auto Service fixed it for her.  Said it was the spark plugs.  They gave it a tune up and Barb has a vehicle again so she can work--as soon as she has recovered from the loss of Piewacket.

Joe Huffman  Monday, July 12, 2004 2:26:00 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback

Saturday we picked up Xenia at camp and brought her home.  She survived but it was tough for a few days.  They didn't pick up on her being a vegatarian (despite the fact that we told them three different ways).  She survived on green salad for several days before finally asking for more food.  See her stories and pictures for more detail.

Sunday Barb and I took her brother and his grandson on a boat ride on Dworshak.  We found a geocache and we placed a geocache there while we were at it.

Joe Huffman  Monday, July 12, 2004 5:07:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Thursday, July 08, 2004

The AP reported last night

Off-duty and retired police officers would have the right to carry concealed weapons in any state under legislation the Senate approved by voice vote Wednesday and sent to the president.

The bill, passed by the House last month, would override some states' prohibitions on carrying concealed firearms. Many states do not recognize other states' concealed weapons permits.

The President is expected to sign it.  Although this isn't everything I want to see (every free and sane person, every place, should be able to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves and other innocent people) it is a good first step.  The anti-gun people have a difficult time articulating effective opposition to it and as more and more people carry these type of defensive tools it becomes more and more difficult for the general population to understand why some people start foaming at the mouth at people being allowed to use the best tools for the job of self-defense.  One step at a time.  That's how we got here and that is the best way to get back to where we belong.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, July 08, 2004 4:09:00 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Wednesday, July 07, 2004

Sunday Barb and I dropped Xenia off at Ross Point Camp where our little witch risked being burned at the stake or being drown.  We continuted on to Missoula where we spent the night.  Monday we hiked around Lolo Hot Springs then continued on to Jerry Johnson Hot Springs.  It is about a mile from the road and it was a nice walk through the woods to it.  We took a few pictures with my new digital camera which generally turned out well.

 

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, July 07, 2004 5:52:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Friday, July 02, 2004

Kim is moving out this weekend.  She's not 18 yet but we co-signed her lease on an apartment in Moscow.  She will have two roommates and they will have a two bedroom apartment to share.  She is taking the old sofa we were going to throw away and one of them will sleep on the hide-a-bed.  It comes not a moment too soon for some of the others in the family.  Xenia wrote me a long email and attached eight pictures (with circles and arrows) explaining why it was no longer tolerable for Kim and her friends to be hanging out at our place.

Also related to Kim is that a couple weeks ago I checked the oil in the pickup and found it did not touch the dipstick.  I told her she should not start it until it was filled.  I checked it a couple days later after she had driven it and it still didn't touch the dipstick.  I told her she was done driving the pickup for a while and disabled it so she couldn't start it even if she wanted too.  I filled it up with oil and enable it last weekend.  But it had a knock in the engine.  Kim drove it a little bit the other day and it came home with a very bad knock.  It's done.  That's two vehicles she has totaled.

Joe Huffman  Friday, July 02, 2004 3:02:00 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Tuesday, June 29, 2004

I read nearly all of the “gun violence“ postings on Join Together Online.  Most of the time they are condensed versions of news stories with an anti-freedom spin.  Occasionally they will have their own writers or a VPC or Brady Bunch press release or 'report'.  Here is a story from someone who I believe to be one of the Join Together Online staffers:

http://www1.jointogether.org/gv/news/features/reader/0,2061,572284,00.html

With the recent passage of a "shall issue" handgun law in Ohio, the number of states that have eased restrictions on concealed gun carrying has risen to 35. But in the face of this onslaught, four heartland states are holding fast to their long-time laws that prohibit the carrying of concealed guns by people other than police officers.

[snip]

Activists in these states say that the task of keeping shall-issue laws from passage is a difficult one, but as Bonavia stated during the recent legislative fight in Wisconsin, "Proponents of (concealed carry) laws claim that concealed weapons will provide individuals with an unparalleled means of self-defense while offering society an effective method of decreasing crime. Experts, scientific evidence, experience, and common sense contradict these claims."

If it isn't painfully obvious to them then surely it is to all rational people--if people legally carrying personal protection tools are a threat to society then why isn't there data to support that conclusion.  Is the best conclusion their “scientific evidence“ can come up with is this?

... Stanford University Law School economist John J. Donohue has conducted an exhaustive study of the effects of all shall-issue states and found that these laws don't reduce crime and may actually increase it.

The vast majority of studies show violent crime is reduced when people are not prohibited from exercising their inalienable right to self-defense.  They found one researcher who was willing to say it “may actually increase it“?  If it did actually increase it then with all the states recognizing peoples right to self-defense should provide lots of data to support that claim.  The data doesn't exist and all they can do is whine about it.  It's about time they had to come face-to-face with their lies.  It makes me smile.  If I didn't know that these people won't give up until someone, figuratively, drives a wooden stake through their hearts I would open a bottle of champagne and toast to their demise.  Anyone have some wooden stakes?  I haven't had a glass of champagne in a long time.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:07:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Saturday, June 26, 2004
Barb and I went for a walk today and found four geocaches.  All within about 1/2 mile of each other and in town.  It's amazing how many of there there are now.  I remember when I had placed the one closest to Moscow and it was several miles out.  Things change.
Joe Huffman  Saturday, June 26, 2004 4:45:00 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Tuesday, June 22, 2004

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59948-2004Jun22.html

First off I need to say I was wrong about something. I implied that the worst our soldiers did in the Baghdad prison was to humiliate some prisoners. It turns out that wasn't true. At least one actually died and there were some activities that bordered on torture. The people responsible are being punished. Compare that to the consequences to the scumbags killing innocent people. Are any of them being punished by their peers? Are any of them even being publically opposed by their peers?

It is my belief they will continue to kill innocents as long as there are mild or no consequences for their actions. I believe one solution would be to announce, and then follow through if necessary, that we will bomb a mosque every time they murder an innocent (non-military) person. As I said in a comment on the Kim duToit blog:

Leave no stone on top of another -- hell don't leave any stones -- turn them all into dust and their fundamental molecular components and put that dust high into the wind. Don't leave anything but a gaping crater behind. Let them know that as far as they are concerned we are their gods and that these gods have a fury and a fist they have never seen the equal of.

Do it 3:00 AM or some such time when the chances of mass casualties are reduced. But be sure we do it. They will fill their mosques with innocent women and children but we could chose the one with the minimum number of casualties and then the second and third time there will be far fewer willing to risk death to support the murders.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:00:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Tuesday, June 15, 2004

I got an email from someone who read my post about the arrest of the guy wanting to blow up a shopping mall:

---
This moron actually wrote that stuff to you????

Good grief.

On the other hand, flying schools (and the FBI) didn't seem to think it strange that people wanted to learn how to fly, but not to land.
---

I get LOTS of email from morons asking how to build bombs.  I try my best to discourage it but, well, they are morons.

Read these pages for example morons:

http://www.boomershoot.org/general/BombHelp.htm
http://www.boomershoot.org/general/BombHelp2003.htm
http://www.boomershoot.org/general/BombHelp2002.htm
http://www.boomershoot.org/general/BombHelp2001.htm
http://www.boomershoot.org/general/BombHelp2000.htm

And those are just the ones that actually bother to write.  So far this month I have received 145 hits (that about 10 hits/day) from people looking for help making a bomb.  I have all their IP addresses and their search query phrases -- stuff like:

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=how+to+make+a+small+bomb
http://web.ask.com/web?q=Want+Some+Help+Building+a+Bomb&o=0&qsrc=0

As of June 1 of this year I have had this many hits year to date on my website http://www.boomershoot.org on bomb building:

  232: how to make a small bomb
   79: building a bomb
   43: how to make a bomb
   37: building a pipe bomb
   30: bomb building
   30: how to make a simple bomb
   26: how to build a bomb
   25: make a small bomb

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:45:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  |  Trackback
Yesterday I received the prints the writer, Lisa Anne Auerbach, sent me.  Very nice pictures.  Not sure the “still life” of the fireball target was the most beautiful picture, but she did take some nice pictures.  Today I got some email saying she sent the article in last week and that usually the magazine policy is to not allow others to see the article until the magazine comes out.  Also, unfortunately, the article was limited to just 500 words.
Joe Huffman  Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:43:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback

Interesting.  Very interesting.  It's possible I had something to do with catching that guy.

-----
http://www.cincypost.com/2004/06/15/terr061504.html

Many in Columbus, Ohio, knew Nuradin M. Abdi as the owner of a cellular
telephone sales business.

But a federal indictment announced Monday accused Abdi, a native of
Somalia, of being an operative for the terror network al-Qaida whose
plans to blow up an unspecified Columbus-area shopping mall were
thwarted by his November arrest.
-----

And from about 1.5 years ago:

----
http://www.boomershoot.org/general/BombHelp2002.htm#TerrorismClass

Hey Joe,

Do you know anything about explosives that are detonated via
cell-phones?

.
.
.

I think I’ve decided to (hypothetically) attack a mall since there’s
practically no security, they’re crowded, and they seem like the type of
target my chosen group would go after. I’d like to set off bombs in
several different key pubic areas, as well as some car-bombs in the
parking garage. The main goal of my terrorist group will be death and
destruction, but actually bringing down the building would be considered
a big plus. However, I know about as much about main building supports
as I do about explosives, so I still have a lot of research to do.

.
.
.

From: FBI Internet Tips
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 8:25 AM
To: joeh@boomershoot.org
Subject: FBI Response

Thank you for your tip to the FBI Internet Tip Line. It is being
evaluated for it's strategic value, and will be disseminated, if
appropriate, for further action. It is the policy of the FBI to not
provide results of that evaluation or action to the providers of
information.

Sincerely,

David N. Rushing/jbv
Supervisory Special Agent
FBI Headquarters
Washington, DC
----

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:38:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  |  Trackback