# Saturday, December 31, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 31, 2005 6:17:48 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Sex )

You would probably guess Georgia, Mississippi, or West Virginia, but this is from Utah:

SALT LAKE CITY The Utah Court of Appeals is upholding a judge's refusal to dismiss a sexual abuse allegation against a 13-year-old Ogden girl who became pregnant by her 12-year-old boyfriend.

The appeals court on Friday ruled that the law's "rigorous protections'' for younger minors include protecting them from each other.

The decision leaves the teens in the position of each being both a victim and a perpetrator in the same offense.

"The Legislature certainly may act to protect the health and safety of children, and may more vigorously protect those of more tender years,'' Judge Gregory Orme wrote for a three-member panel of the court, which made its decision "with some reluctance.''

The girl's Ogden attorneys, Randall Richards and Dee Smith, are considering an appeal to the Utah Supreme Court.

Richards pointed out that Utah law says minors under age 14 do not have the ability to consent to sexual activity.

"It's a paradox,'' he said. "How can they be old enough to commit an offense if they're not old enough to consent to it?''

...

Juveniles who are 14 or 15 and have sex with peers can be charged with unlawful conduct with a minor but the law provides for mitigation when the age difference is less than four years, making the offense a misdemeanor.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 31, 2005 3:04:21 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Quote of the Day )

What men call social virtues, good fellowship, is commonly but the virtue of pigs in a litter, which lie close together to keep each other warm.

Henry David Thoreau
(1817-62), U.S. philosopher, author, naturalist.
Journal entry, 23 Oct. 1852.

# Friday, December 30, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 30, 2005 9:46:06 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights )

From CBC News on the Canadian gun registry program:
1995
Bill C-68, the strictest gun control legislation in Canadian history, receives Senate approval. It calls for harsher penalties for crimes involving the use of guns, creates the Firearms Act and also requires gun owners to be licensed and registered. At the time, the government says the registry would cost about $119 million, but the revenue generated by registration fees would mean taxpayers would only be on the hook for $2 million.

...

Feb. 13, 2004
Documents obtained by Zone Libre of CBC's French news service suggest that the gun registry has cost $2 billion so far.

May 20, 2004
The Liberal government, just days before an expected election call, eliminates fees for registering and transferring firearms. Ottawa will also limit its spending on the gun registry to $25 million a year, spending which has averaged $33 million a year and reached as high as $48 million. Licensing of gun owners and firearms will continue.

June 2005
In the 2004 Report of the Commissioner of Firearms on the administration of the Firearms Act, the Canada Firearms Centre estimates that the cost of running the registry for the year ending Dec. 31, 2004 was less than $100 million. The report says costs are continuing their downward trend and should fall to approximately $85 million beginning in fiscal 2005-2006.

You don't need an accounting or psychology degree to figure out these anti-gun people have mental problems.  Estimated to cost $2 million and it then comes in at 1000 times more at $2 BILLION.  The Liberal government says spending on the gun registry has never been more than $48 million per year.  This is AFTER it has been revealed in the previous nine years they have spent $2 billion--meaning that on the average they have spent over $222 million per year.

With that $2 billion they could have funded 1000 more cops or better yet it could have purchased guns and training for 2 million at risk people--such as the 14 women who were killed in Montreal in 1989 when they didn't have gun to defend themselves with and woman hating Muslim extremist Gamil Gharbi started shooting them.  It was that incident that initiated the push for the gun registry.  Instead of taking the appropriate, time proven, path of providing a means for people to defend themselves they let their bigotry and mental disorders cloud their thinking.  At last report the gun registry, at a cost of $2 billion, has only been credited with solving one crime.  So what do the Liberals conclude is the correct answer?  Why of course!  It's more gun control.  There is no need to have them answer Just One Question.  All you need is a body temperature I.Q. to come to the correct conclusion on these mental defects called Liberals.
By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 30, 2005 5:53:20 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

"We're from the government & we're here to help you". If you ever hear those words I hope you've already started your draw.

Publicola
http://publicola.mu.nu/archives/2005/12/10/another_case_of_government_internment_camps.html
[While succinct and insightful in the literal sense I must disagree.  If they are at your door when you start your draw you started far too late.  See Why Boomershoot for a more practical approach.  At an absolute minimum you should engage from a block away.  Preferable would be a different neighborhood, city, or state.  And if possible a different country--which is part of why I support the war against the Islamic extremists.--Joe]

# Thursday, December 29, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:32:17 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Current News | Freedom | Politics )

Tell me again why we didn't open the ANWR for more oil production.  Here is a important clue as to why we should:

PICTURE the families shivering in apartments without heating, factories grinding to a halt, frozen water pipes bursting in the depths of winter. Welcome to the new Cold War.

At 10am on Sunday, Russia is threatening to unleash the most powerful weapon in its post-Soviet arsenal: unless Ukraine agrees to a fourfold increase in the price it pays for gas, Russia will simply turn off the tap.

Nor is it just Ukraine under threat — the EU imports about half of its gas from Russia and 80 per cent of that comes through Ukrainian pipelines.

So when President Putin met Ivan Plachkov, the Ukrainian Energy Minister, in Moscow yesterday, there was more at stake than relations between the neighbouring states. Analysts fear the dispute could provide a foretaste of how Russia will use its massive oil and gas reserves as a foreign policy tool in future disputes with the West.

“Energy co-operation has replaced military might as the mainstay of Russia’s international credibility,” Chris Weafer, chief strategist at Alfa Bank in Moscow, said. “It is using its importance as an energy partner to pursue its geopolitical and foreign policy agenda.”

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:26:17 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Technology )

Radio Frequency ID--the chips they put in pets for identifcation (and some people want to put them in people) are everywhere.  They used for inventory control, shoplifting detection, and ID cards.  Here is how to make your own wallet that will block the remote reading of the devices in your pocket.

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:01:15 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom )

They should have taken care of this guy decades ago.  Apparently he was overlooked.  I'm of the opinion they should give serious consideration to correcting the oversight.  In any case that he is outraged is not something anyone should loose any sleep over:

The Palestinian mastermind of the Munich Olympics terrorist attack, which killed 11 Israeli athletes, says he is outraged at not being consulted for the Steven Spielberg thriller Munich. 

He also accused the director of pandering to the Jewish state and said the new film about the incident would not deliver reconciliation.

Mohammed Daoud planned the Munich attack on behalf of PLO splinter group Black September, but did not take part in, and does not feature in, the film.

...

"We did not target Israeli civilians," he said.

"Some of them [the athletes] had taken part in wars and killed many Palestinians. Whether a pianist or an athlete, any Israeli is a soldier."

They use the same sort of logic when they kill Israeli children--they would have grown up to be Israeli soldiers.

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:45:33 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Places Without Guns )

From Alberta Canada:

RCMP in Alberta have admitted they made a mistake in failing to respond to a 911 call made by a woman who was later found murdered in her home.

Brenda Moreside, 44, was found stabbed to death last February in her home in High Prairie, Alta., nearly 300 kilometres northwest of Edmonton.

The night she was killed, she called 911, complaining that her common-law husband was drunk and trying to break into her house.

She was told by police that they couldn't come because the man was breaking into his own residence and damaging his own property. Moreside was found dead in the doorway of her home 12 days later.

"The lack of attendance in this particular case was clearly an error," Supt. Marty Cheliak told a news conference in Edmonton Thursday.

Technically, she could have had a gun.  The problem is that the Canadian government has made it difficult, complicated, and time consuming.  "Just dial 911! It's the government's job to take care of your needs."  It is possible that there was a gun in the house and he knew she didn't have a clue as to how to use it.  Which is the reason my kids all took the NRA Personal Protection class.  If you really need to use a gun you need to use it NOW! So, the husband knew it was very unlikely she had a gun or that she didn't know how to use any gun that might have been present.

In any case this Neanderthal knew he could break in and kill her without concern of having his attitude forcibly adjusted by small pieces of metal traversing his brain at Mach 2.5--which reminds me of a Greg Hamilton quote.

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 29, 2005 11:42:14 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Places Without Guns )

From the U.K. and the News.Telegraph:

Police are searching for the man responsible for a the suspected abduction and sexual assault of a six-year-old girl who was taken from her bath and left naked in a nearby street.

...

"From her account, somebody has been brazen enough to enter her house, take her away undressed and then assaulted her in a manner which is clearly sexually motivated, and then leave her in this lane, in the dark, on her own," he said.

"I consider that individual to be extremely dangerous and that is why I am keen to trace that individual and arrest him."

The detective, who is leading the Northumbria Police inquiry, said examination of the scene and the victim indicated her account was true.

"I am satisfied that the report, as it was given to us, is real and is credible and we are seeking to trace a male who is not known to the girl, who has entered the house and taken that girl out to conduct a sexually-motivated assault," Mr Napier said.

Invasions of homes while the residents are home are rare in the U.S. but common in the U.K.  Sociologists and criminologists researching the differences found that criminals feared getting shot by a resident more than being arrested by the police.  This pond scum lowlife knew he would not get shot while committing this crime even though the residents were present and awake.  The odds of surviving such a brazen crime in political jurisdictions where the right of ownership of firearms is recognized without being thoroughly ventilated by high velocity lead poisoning is about 50%.  It is an exceedingly rare criminal that is so stupid that they will risk those odds of such a catastrophic failure of their victim selection process.

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:37:48 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Quote of the Day )

Modern totalitarianisms have been a stark reminder, but did not newly teach, that the kicked-in door is the symbol of a rule of fear and violence fatal to institutions founded on respect for the integrity of man.

Felix Frankfurter
Supreme Court of the United States
365 U.S. 167
Monroe v. Pape
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 39 Argued: November 8, 1960 --- Decided: February 20, 1961
[This SCOTUS opinion was written before the "War on Drugs" began.  Current politicians and judges should take this "stark reminder" to heart.--Joe]

# Wednesday, December 28, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 28, 2005 5:02:47 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Boomershoot | Technology )

Via Bruce Schneier comes this article in USA Today:

Scientists at a Georgia laboratory have developed what could be a low-tech, low-cost weapon in the war on terrorism: trained wasps.

The tiny, non-stinging wasps can check for hidden explosives at airports and monitor for toxins in subway tunnels.

"You can rear them by the thousands, and you can train them within a matter of minutes," says Joe Lewis, a U.S. Agriculture Department entomologist. "This is just the very tip of the iceberg of a very new resource."

...

The wasps are trained with sugar water by using the classical conditioning techniques made famous by Pavlov's dogs. Rains says the wasps are sensitive to a host of chemical odors, including 2,4-DNT, a volatile compound used in dynamite.

To do their work, five wasps — each a half-inch long — are placed in a plastic cylinder that is 15 inches tall. This "Wasp Hound," which costs roughly $100 per unit, has a vent in one end and a camera that connects to a laptop computer.

When the wasps pick up an odor they've been trained to detect they gather by the vent — a response that can be measured by the computer or actually seen by observers.

Lewis says the wasps, when exposed to some chemicals, "can detect as low as four parts per billion, which is an incredibly small amount."


I admire the innovation in the research laboratory but I am skeptical of success in the real world. The wasps apparently have to be trained for each specific volatile chemical. The 2,4-DNT mentioned in the article as being present in dynamite doesn't exist in other explosives such as ammonium-nitrate/fuel-oil mixtures. Ammonium nitrate by itself doesn't really have any volatile byproducts other than, in some cases, ammonia which would result in the obvious problem with false positives. Fuel oil sensing would also have similar problems with false positives as well as being easily replaced with almost any hydrocarbon including such things as diesel, alcohol, and powdered sugar.

The ATF as well as foreign regulatory agencies require plastic explosives to be manufactured with a small percentage of volatile chemicals such as Ethylene glycol dinitrate, 2,3-Dimethyl-2,3-dinitrobutane, para-mononitrotoluene, or ortho-mononitrotoluene. This is to make it feasible to easily detect the presence of the explosives.

It would be overly optimistic to assume terrorists would conform to these requirement in the manufacture of their own explosives.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 28, 2005 12:17:55 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | PNNL | Quote of the Day | Technology )

He's clearly nuts.

Ry Jones
December 27, 2005
[Referring to this guy thinking government regulation could prevent abuse of a mandatory Universal Biometric ID and such a system was inevitable.  See also some of the on-line clashes I have had with him.  He is also my number one suspect as to the person that gave PNNL the 'tip' to look at my blog and websites and if true is probably a conspirator in this felony.  See about half way down on this page for more details.--Joe]

# Tuesday, December 27, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 27, 2005 11:58:24 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights )

The offense always has the advantage in security.  Defense only has to make one mistake.  TSA is now appearing to go on the offense.  It should result in a big improvement in security:

The Transportation Security Administration plans to train screeners at 40 major airports next year to pick out possible terrorists by engaging travelers in a casual conversation to detect whether a person appears nervous or evasive and needs extra scrutiny.

The new security technique, already in use at some airports, adds a psychological dimension to screening by trying to find high-risk passengers based on how they act at checkpoints or boarding gates.

Passengers who raise suspicions will undergo extra physical screening and could face police questioning.

...

State police Sgt. Peter DiDomenica called the program "an antidote to racial profiling" that focuses on "objective behavioral characteristics." He said the program has curbed racial profiling "because we've educated people."

Behavior detection is routine in security-conscious countries such as Israel, where air travelers routinely face aggressive questioning.

U.S. Customs officers have long asked arriving travelers questions, often in random order. If a person gives "stumbling answers," that could indicate the person has fraudulent travel documents or plans to overstay a visa, Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman Kelly Klundt said.

Now if they would just do the research that I have been suggesting be done.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 27, 2005 3:31:16 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights )

Jenny Price in the Washington Post is critical of anti-freedom lobbying groups for "thinking small":
...what troubles me most is that the gun control lobby is pouring its resources into battles that probably won't save many lives -- and we're losing even those.

...

The real problem is not that handguns aren't safe or well-regulated enough, or that you can't sue and try to bankrupt a corrupt manufacturer after someone you love has been killed. The problem is that 65 million people in the United States own handguns.

...

And if the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which leads the gun control crusade, continues to assure us that it won't try to outlaw handguns?

...

Wouldn't it make more sense to define the ultimate battle as one for a national ban on handguns -- the sole gun-control measure that promises to save tens of thousands of lives? With an endgame that can actually achieve the ultimate goal, perhaps we'd acquire the logical and moral authority to win more of the smaller battles.

First off, I am extremely sorry for the tragic loss of her brother to a someone using a gun.  But it wasn't a gun that killed him, it was someone using a gun.  That someone could have used a car, fire, or a kitchen knife to do the same evil.  It's the user, not the tool, that is evil.

Going on to the more important points it is she, Ms. Price, that is guilty of "thinking small."  She has an extremely poor source of information when she claims:
Of the 12,000 guns used to kill people every year, 160 are used in legitimate self-defense.
Ignoring that she confuses the number of guns used to kill people with the number of people killed with guns (the same gun is often used to kill several people) I suspect she got her number from the number of initial charges of murder that were later dropped, or perhaps mixed up the number of self-defenses in some small geographical area or short time period and compared that to the number of people killed in the entire nation during a year.  In any case even the most casual of researchers can find far more than 160 cases of legitimate self-defense in a year.  The real number, according to numerous studies, is somewhere between one and three million per year--most of which don't result in a shot being fired and never make it into the news.

Hence, her error of "thinking small" has to do with her use of a very small number for legitimate self-defense uses of firearms.  Many of the other numbers she uses are distorted or misleading as well.

Add to that Just One Question which puts to rest the false promise of banning weapons to improve public safety and I think Ms. Price should have sufficient material to expand her thinking on the issue before she writes another opinion piece.
By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 27, 2005 10:35:27 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Places Without Guns )

Imagine being in the other room as someone counts down to the moment he is going to murder another member of your household--and there is nothing you can do about it because of government restrictions on firearms.  It's not just terrible nightmare--it happened:

ST. CATHARINES, Ont. (CP) — Terrified occupants of a southern Ontario home were forced to listen from another room as a gunman counted down before shooting a 29-year-old man to death on Christmas Eve.

The execution-style killing happened shortly after Shelston Broome was confronted by the three men in his home around 2:30 a.m. Saturday, police said.

Two other occupants in the home were forced at gunpoint to lie face-down on the floor and were pistol-whipped when they were slow to obey, police said.

Investigators said the gunmen then took Broome into another room and counted down before killing him as the two other people listened in horror.
By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:59:19 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom )

Ever wonder if the NSA or some other "men in black" are reading your email?  Via Bruce Schneier we have this simple test method from Richard M. Smith.  Furthermore this same test can tell you if they break the decryption you are using.

Very clever.  I like it a lot.  It's an additional, and extremely useful, twist on something I suggested at GRPC 2000.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:33:19 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( PNNL )

I have a five hour drive to work at the beginning of the week and a five hour drive home at the end of the week.  Five hours of boredom--except my mind has lots of time to dwell on things.  This time I was focused on the bigots at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.  In addition to the stress of the excess of adrenalin in my system without cruise control I found myself traveling above the speed limit numerous times and ended up cutting about 20 minutes off the usual drive time.  I wouldn't have mentioned this except after trying to sleep for a couple hours I decided to read a few blogs and immediately found Michelle Malkin has posted on something I can relate to. 

It's another example of where the law doesn't apply to certain people but it does to others.  Currently PNNL is in defiance (or has flat out lied about the existence of certain documents) of several Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act requests.  And they still employee the people that committed a felony against me--costing me hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost income and appears to have destroyed my career.  And that doesn't even consider the adverse impact on national security due to the negative impact of losing my contribution on certain projects.

All the anger generated while driving may not have been entirely wasted--I thought of another way to put some pressure on them.  I have some meetings arranged for talk about more traditional methods in the next few weeks but in the mean time I can start preparing a non-conventional surprise for the felons.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:09:09 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Politics | Quote of the Day )

What is a communist?  One who has yearnings
For equal division of unequal earnings.
Idler or bungler, or both, he is willing
To fork out his copper and pocket a shilling.

Ebenezer Elliott

# Monday, December 26, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 26, 2005 12:55:48 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Sex )

I have some very interesting friends.  Barb thinks I attract them some way or another.  Of course she doesn't always describe them as "interesting".  Sometimes when people start talking about things that maybe they shouldn't be talking about it's best to just listen and not say anything that might cause them to realize they are talking about something they shouldn't be talking about.  The problem with this strategy is that you can end up with a lot of missing pieces.  Some fragments that don't really make sense or that leave some very interesting questions unanswered.  I just got another piece to something that has puzzled me for years.  Here's the additional piece from Antonin Scalia:

 I even accept for the sake of argument that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged.

The original "puzzle" was presented to me about eight or ten years ago by a casual friend while sitting in a hot tub at a party.  That bit of information will have to remain unpublicized.  He really shouldn't have been talking about that.

By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 26, 2005 12:40:49 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Home Life )

A friend in High School had a very unique personality.  Very smart and a wacky sense of humor.  He was just there for one year when we were sophmores.  We sort of kept in touch for a year or two afterwards but nothing after we went away to college.  At the High School class reunions another friend of his and I would talk and say to each other, "I wonder whatever happened to Ken..."  Around our 30th year reunion Ken made contact and we have exchanged a few emails.  Every year he and his family make a Christmas video and I can see his personality from nearly 35 years ago in those videos.  Here is his video for this Christmas.

By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 26, 2005 11:53:29 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Quote of the Day )

Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratification's, and to watch over their fate.  That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild.  It would be like the authority of a parent, if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks on the contrary to keep them in perpetual childhood ...it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns ...Thus it everyday renders the exercise of the free agency of man less useful and less frequent ...It covers the surface of society with a network of small, complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd.  The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided ...such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize; but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to be nothing but a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which government is the shepherd.
 
Alexis de Tocqueville
Democracy In America 1840
[The Nanny State concept has been around around for a long time.--Joe]

# Sunday, December 25, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 25, 2005 3:26:38 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Freedom | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

“Just because something is irrational doesn’t mean you don’t have to believe in it.” This single idea has a complete disregard for truth. It doesn’t matter that the world has been proven round, you can still believe it’s flat if you want to. It doesn’t matter if all evidence shows that people have the same genetic code no matter what their skin color is; you can still believe some are inferior if you want to. What this statement means is that you can believe whatever you want, it doesn’t have to be true. There are no right or wrong answers, everyone’s beliefs are equally valid.

James Huffman-Scott
Speech for Comm 101
2001
From http://www.joehuffman.org/misc/LifeChange.htm

# Saturday, December 24, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 24, 2005 12:42:16 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

It is morally as bad not to care whether a thing is true or not, so long as it makes you feel good, as it is not to care how you got your money as long as you have got it.

Edmund Way Teale
Circle of the Seasons
[Thanks to James for pointing this one out to me.  And just in case you didn't make the connection this is about people that seek security at the expense of freedom such as those that favor gun control.--Joe]

# Friday, December 23, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 23, 2005 4:47:46 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Boomershoot | Freedom | Gun Rights )

Previously I announced half price entry for Boomershoot 2006 to Canadian entrants due to the proposed firearms ban in their country and the real reason for Boomershoot.  Considering British subjects have already had their firearms taken away and the news from yesterday on how they are taking the next step toward a police state I'm offering all British subjects free entry.  Furthermore if their current residence is the U.K. and they give me a month's notice of their intent to participate I will provide the rifle and ammo.  All anonymous of course.  Send me an email, encrypted if desired (PGP key below), to reserve the position, show proof of citizenship and/or residency upon arrival and get in for free.

Arrive a couple days early and I'll show you how to make reactive targets as well.

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2
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=B8Jd
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 23, 2005 4:30:08 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights )

Thanks to Dale for an email that pointed this out:

 Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.

By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 23, 2005 11:33:34 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics )

This started out to be a comment to Steve's post and his question, "What on earth is going on back home?"  It grew in size and scope to the point it needed to be its own post which I now offer to you.  It's not the first time (here is a collection) I have touched on the subject and for certain it will not the last.

The number of days I have spent in the U.K. can be counted on one hand so I recognize my limitations on being an authority on the politics and mindset there. However, it is my opinion that the rush toward a police state in the U.K. is because of a mindset that developed slowly over the last 70 to 80 years. Read F.A. Hayek's Road to Serfdom for my best guess at to what is going on. Hayek published the book in 1944 and he was specifically warning the U.K. about the dangers of where they were headed. The basic problem as outlined by Hayek is that the people decided it was the job of government to take care of them. From socialized medicine to giving up their right to self defense it's always the government who is responsible. Once that mindset is cemented into place and the government fails on any given task the "answer" is always more power to the government.

The really scary part is what comes next. As Hayek points out extreme power, however benign the original people to whom it is given, attracts "the wrong sort of people" and is repulsive to those who would be most responsible with it. Hence the more power the government is given the more you will find people in government that should not be given that power. The examples abound--Soviet Union, Communist China, and Nazi Germany. In the 20th century there were at least 60 million people killed by their own governments because of this sort of error in political philosophy. I hope the U.K. will not be a prime example of the 21 century.

One would think that after 60 million dead the lesson would have been learned but the evidence from the U.K. is that some people may still have to learn it for themselves.

By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 23, 2005 11:23:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Quote of the Day )

Now, it is somewhat difficult to think of Germany and Italy, or of Russia, not as different worlds but as products of a development of thought in which we have shared; it is, at least so far as our enemies are concerned, easier and more comforting to think that they are entirely different from us and that what happened there cannot happen here.  Yet the history of those countries in the years before the rise of the totalitarian system showed few features with which we are not familiar.

F.A. Hayek
The Road to Serfdom, Page 14
Published 1944
[This relates both to my previous post and next.--Joe]

# Thursday, December 22, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:07:07 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | When Prophecy Fails )

1984 versus 2014, what's 30 years when you are writing about society nearly 40 years in the future?

From Bruce Schneier we get this news:
Britain is to become the first country in the world where the movements of all vehicles on the roads are recorded. A new national surveillance system will hold the records for at least two years.

Using a network of cameras that can automatically read every passing number plate, the plan is to build a huge database of vehicle movements so that the police and security services can analyse any journey a driver has made over several years.

The network will incorporate thousands of existing CCTV cameras which are being converted to read number plates automatically night and day to provide 24/7 coverage of all motorways and main roads, as well as towns, cities, ports and petrol-station forecourts.

By next March a central database installed alongside the Police National Computer in Hendon, north London, will store the details of 35 million number-plate "reads" per day. These will include time, date and precise location, with camera sites monitored by global positioning satellites.

Already there are plans to extend the database by increasing the storage period to five years and by linking thousands of additional cameras so that details of up to 100 million number plates can be fed each day into the central databank.
And that's just the beginning.  Here's the future:
The new national surveillance network for tracking car journeys, which has taken more than 25 years to develop, is only the beginning of plans to monitor the movements of all British citizens. The Home Office Scientific Development Branch in Hertfordshire is already working on ways of automatically recognising human faces by computer, which many people would see as truly introducing the prospect of Orwellian street surveillance, where our every move is recorded and stored by machines.
It's a slippery slope.  The government takes the guns away "to reduce crime" and when that doesn't work they conclude more government power over the people is needed and when that doesn't work they need still more power. They never give consideration that giving power back to the people could be a good idea.  As Lyle points out, only when government involved do people conclude that their failures mean we should give them more money.  It's a classic When Prophecy Fails case.  It's also an extreme failure of the Jews in the Attic Test.

This is extremely scary stuff.  I gives me shivers and just drains the energy from me.
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 22, 2005 12:57:45 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Places Without Guns )

Massachusetts has some of the strictest gun control in the nation.  The Brady Bunch should be proud that the scumbag didn't have a gun when he did this:

PLYMOUTH (AP) -- A Framingham man is being held without bail on charges he kidnapped a woman and her two-year-old son and raped the mother repeatedly over a two-day period.

Police arrested Evandro Doirado Monday night after the woman silently mouthed "help me" to a liquor store clerk.

Plymouth County District Attorney Tim Cruz says the victim was carjacked at knifepoint Saturday night in the parking lot of a Wal-Mart in Framingham. Cruz says the woman was raped twice in the car before being taken to the Plymouth Sands motel, where she was attacked again as the toddler cowered by the bed.

It was when Doirado took the victim to a liquor store on Monday night that she was able to mouth the words "help me" and the name of the motel to the clerk.

Cruz says Doirado did not know the woman and the attack appears to be random.

Yeah.  Real proud.  If the woman had been carrying a gun she probably wouldn't have gotten carjacked to begin with.  The Brady Bunch and the politicians that listen to them should be on trial with the scumbag.
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 22, 2005 12:28:07 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Politics )

Domain Name

 

senate.gov ? (United States Government)

IP Address

 

156.33.59.# (U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms)

156.33.59.61

ISP

 

U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms

Location

 

Continent

 : 

North America

Country

 : 

United States  (Facts)

State

 : 

District of Columbia

City

 : 

Washington

Lat/Long

 : 

38.8933, -77.0146 (Map)

Language

 

English
en

Operating System

 

Macintosh MacOSX

Browser

 

Safari 1.3
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/416.12 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/416.13

Javascript

 

version 1.5

Monitor

 

Resolution

 : 

1680 x 1050

Color Depth

 : 

32 bits

Time of Visit

 

Dec 21 2005 5:11:53 pm

Last Page View

 

Dec 21 2005 5:11:53 pm

Visit Length

 

0 seconds

Page Views

 

1

Referring URL

 

http://mysite.verizon.net/res0shfo/

Visit Entry Page

 

http://blog.joehuffman.org/

Visit Exit Page

 

http://blog.joehuffman.org/

Time Zone

 

UTC-5:00
EST - Eastern Standard
EDT - Eastern Daylight Saving Time

Visitor's Time

 

Dec 21 2005 8:11:53 pm

Visit Number

 

54,062

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 22, 2005 12:14:43 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

Mr. Hamilton has an amazing way with words. They can be like the Zen master smacking you upside the head, knocking you free of your ‘self’ for a moment of clarity.

...

I don’t think Greg is really being flippant. Talking with him outside of class impressed me with not only how much he thinks about what he teaches, but that he thinks a lot about communication, about how he teaches. He’s very deliberate. 

I’m not privy to his internal reasoning, but I can make some observations. “Make the most of it” carries the same vital information of a more somber “scan and assess”. Its tone matches the adrenaline-charged situation that it is describing. It suggests an active, optimistic defensive mind-set. The first time you hear it, it’s so provocative that you think about it more. It’s also sufficiently cool that you want to remember it. Remembering it takes you to other things you learned in that class. It’s a rhetorical and cognitive hook in addition to its primary payload. 

That said, like you, I try to watch what I say. A line I spring on friends with irritating frequency is, “That will come up at your trial.”

Sean Flynn
December 20, 2005
[On the general issue of this quote by Greg Hamilton.--Joe]

# Wednesday, December 21, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 21, 2005 1:58:41 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights )

I did a little follow up and found the end of the story I had reported on before (here and here):

I'm glad to announce that my attorney, Walter Maksym, was able to convince the State's Attorney to dismiss my case on December 8th. So, it looks like it's all over for now! It truly is a wonderful relief to be done with the criminal charges.
He shouldn't have been arrested for wearing a coat to begin with but having the case dismissed is the next best thing.
By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:45:30 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Home Life )

It's not well known and I really hadn't ever planned to tell anyone but Xenia spilled the beans on her Live Journal so there's no point in continuing to hide it.  For the last 17 years we have told people we have three children, James, Kim, and Xenia.  This photo is of Xenia:

Yeah.  Identical quadruplets.  This will explain certain other things people have long wondered about.  Xenia maintains two Live Journals and her own website, gets nearly straight A's in school, has a boyfriend, and almost never gets in trouble (she always has at least a couple alibis).  In addition to it being rare to have identical quadruplets this set is even more rare in that they have identical fingerprints.  I figured this might come in handy someday but now that Xenia has spilled the beans that game is pretty much over.  Oh, well... Merry Christmas everyone.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:23:32 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Sex )

Three days ago I told you the Canadian Supreme Court was about to rule on the legality of swingers clubs.  The ruling is out now:

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Group sex between consenting adults is neither prostitution nor a threat to society, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Wednesday, dismissing arguments that the sometimes raucous activities of so-called "swingers" clubs were dangerous.

In a ruling that radically changes the way Canadian courts determine what poses a threat to the population, the court threw out the conviction of a Montreal man who ran a club where members could have group sex in a private room behind locked doors.

"Consensual conduct behind code-locked doors can hardly be supposed to jeopardize a society as vigorous and tolerant as Canadian society," said the opinion of the seven-to-two majority, written by Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin.

...

"Criminal indecency or obscenity must rest on actual harm or a significant risk of harm to individuals or society. The Crown failed to establish this essential element of the offence. The Crown's case must therefore fail," wrote McLachlin.

In indecency cases, Canadian courts have traditionally probed whether the acts in question "breached the rules of conduct necessary for the proper functioning of society". The Supreme Court ruled that from now on, judges should pay more attention to whether society would be harmed.

The judges said that just because most Canadians might disapprove of swingers' clubs, this did not necessarily mean the establishments were socially dangerous.

"Attitudes in themselves are not crimes, however deviant they may be or disgusting they may appear," the judges said, noting that no one had been pressured to have sex or had paid for sex in either of the cases.

"The autonomy and liberty of members of the public was not affected by unwanted confrontation with the sexual activity in question only those already disposed to this sort of sexual activity were allowed to participate and watch," they said.

I won't be going to Canada anytime soon even if Barb said I could do some "field research".  They may have figured out sex between consenting adults isn't a threat to society at large but they haven't figured out that someone that carries a handgun for person protection and hasn't ever committed any crime worse that going 10 or 15 MPH over the speed limit isn't a threat either.  But this is a step away from the Nanny State.  I wish the fiscal conservatives in this country would realize that being a Nanny State isn't just about refusing to let people spend their own money however they think is best.  It's also a Nanny State that tells individuals they can't fry their brains with recreational drugs, marry the person of their choice, or play a group game of belly bump.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 21, 2005 1:12:33 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

From the Greg Hamilton to English Dictionary by Meredith Robinson:

Steely eyed dealers of death.

Translation: Microsoft Gun Club Members.
[For my friends at Microsoft.  They know who they are and why I chose this one for today.--Joe]

# Tuesday, December 20, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 20, 2005 6:57:03 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

But screening will never be perfect. We can't keep weapons out of prisons, a much more restrictive and controlled environment. How can we have a hope of keeping them off airplanes? The way to prevent airplane terrorism is not to spend additional resources keeping objects that could fall into the wrong hands off airplanes. The way to improve airplane security is to spend those resources keeping the wrong hands from boarding airplanes in the first place, and to make those hands ineffective if they do.

Exactly two things have made airline travel safer since 9/11: reinforcing the cockpit door, and passengers who now know that they may have to fight back. Everything else -- all that extra screening, those massive passenger profiling systems -- is security theatre.

Bruce Schneier
The Sydney Morning Herald
November 30, 2005
[See also my essay on the research we should be doing.  Airport screening accomplishes only one thing.  It makes some people feel better.--Joe]

# Monday, December 19, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 19, 2005 9:49:10 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Ballistics | Technology )

It was given up for lost almost two years ago but it was a mystery what happened to it.  Now they believe they have found the wreckage:

SCIENTISTS believe they have finally found the wreckage of the stricken Beagle 2 Mars probe, almost two years after it crashed on landing.

A sophisticated analysis of grainy images from a Nasa spacecraft has convinced the Beagle 2 team that the lander met its end in a small crater, into which it touched down in the early hours of Christmas Day 2003 with little chance of survival.

The pictures from Mars Global Surveyor, which have been pored over by an expert who once interpreted spy satellite images for the RAF, show an impact point in the crater and several objects that appear to be Beagle 2’s protective gas bags and, perhaps, the lander itself.

They suggest that the probe was lost because of cruel luck as it touched down in one of the worst possible places for a soft and successful landing. Rather than dropping to the surface on a flat plain, it appears to have first struck the downslope of a small crater about 18.5m (60ft) in diameter, before crashing into its opposite wall, bouncing several times around the rim and eventually coming to rest at the bottom. Even if the gas bags that were meant to cushion its impact were fully inflated, and there is some evidence that they were not, their design would not have allowed them to protect the probe properly under these unlikely circumstances.

Bummer.

I'm a big proponent of space exploration.  Long term getting off this planet is one of the necessary conditions for the survival of our species.  And in the medium term it represents one of the higher likelihood events to restore our freedoms.  Mars represents a good target for colonization and every time we go there it helps us to understand the problems of the journey and the habitation a little bit better. 

Another motivation for getting into space is I would like to be the first person to shoot 1000 yard groups on the moon.  With no wind and 1/5 gravity the group sizes will be awesome!  And you wondered why I had shooting conditions for the moon built into Modern Ballistics.  And no, despite a certain science fiction story you can't put bullets into orbit from the surface of the moon.  Shooting tangential to the surface I estimate you need to be about 550 970 miles above the surface to achieve a circular orbit with a .220 Swift. 

I sent in my application to NASA to be an astronaut 15 days before Challenger blew up which stymied that career path but I figure if my friend gets his immortality project working I still have a chance.  In addition to immortality he wants to carve his initials in the moon big enough to be seen from earth with the naked eye.  Since explosives are one of the best ways of carving rock he asked if I would do it for him.  If he figures out how to get us safely to the moon and back I'll figure out a way to carve the 70 mile wide LINES of his initials.  With all the other gear going up I figure there would be room for my rifle and a thousand rounds of ammo (especially if he uses the Orion concept).

Update: I rethought my back of the envelope (literally) calculations this morning and realize I had made an error.  I did some more number crunching and came up with some different numbers.  And since orbital mechanics is not my specialty I'm not guaranteeing any of these numbers.  Useful web pages to figure it out for yourself are here and here.  I'm assuming a muzzle velocity of 4000 fps out of the .220 Swift which has one of the highest muzzle velocities in a commerical load.

By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 19, 2005 7:46:21 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights )

I guess it's not surprising that Tom Diaz at the VPC would say something like this:

''Because the bad guys have assault rifles, law enforcement officers should?'' asks Tom Diaz, senior policy analyst for the Violence Policy Center, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit organization that advocates gun control.

"I don't see the rationale behind that type of thinking. What's next? Cops in armored cars and tanks? This is moving toward the militarization of law enforcement.''

The problem for Diaz is that if he concedes police have a need for rifles to defend themselves and other innocent life then he is put in the uncomfortable position of private citizens making a claim for the need of similar defensive tools.  But what annoys me is that the Miami Herald would preface the Diaz statement with:

 But some experts say arming officers with rifles is a knee-jerk reaction.

Diaz is an expert on gun control and victim disarmament in general--not on the equipment needs of police officers.  If he is the expert then let him take point on the arrest of the next criminal armed with rifle to show everyone how it is done.  In that same article is a prime example of the type of person I would like Diaz to demonstrate on:

Deputies point to Ralston Davis as an example of the potential danger police can face when they aren't adequately armed.

Davis, accused of killing three people, sent officers a chilling message when he was arrested Dec. 2 with a knock-off version of the high-powered AR-15 rifle:

''Hand me my [rifle] and a bullet, and I will kill you all,'' Davis told BSO deputies.  "Stand in front of me, and I'll put a bullet in your face.''

Here are your handcuffs and pepper spray--you're The Man Tom.  Show us how it's done.

By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 19, 2005 7:23:35 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Quote of the Day )

I see a global terrorist movement that exploits Islam in the service of radical political aims - a vision in which books are burned, and women are oppressed, and all dissent is crushed. Terrorist operatives conduct their campaign of murder with a set of declared and specific goals - to de-moralize free nations, to drive us out of the Middle East, to spread an empire of fear across that region, and to wage a perpetual war against America and our friends. These terrorists view the world as a giant battlefield - and they seek to attack us wherever they can.

...

We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them. And we will defeat the terrorists by capturing and killing them abroad, removing their safe havens, and strengthening new allies like Iraq and Afghanistan in the fight we share.

 

President George W. Bush
President's Address to the Nation
December 18, 2005

# Sunday, December 18, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 18, 2005 6:59:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Home Life )

Working 300 miles from home is a drag.  Incredibly depressing at times and always lonely.  Then there is the five hour drive home on Friday night and the five hour drive back to the Seattle area on Sunday afternoon.  But this weekend Barb was able to get Thursday and Friday off.  So she showed up about 16:00 on Thursday and made life so much more pleasant.  I got an extra night and day with her.  And we had access to the treats of the Seattle area.  So we saw a movie (The Family Stone), went to some nice restaurants (there is this great Japanese buffet in Redmond Town Square), and visited with a friend Barb hasn't seen in about ten years.  Most of the time however was just spent in bed.  No kids, only very minimal chores to do and so we could just focus on each other.  Very nice.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 18, 2005 12:59:34 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Current News | Freedom | Gun Rights | PNNL )

I recently received an email telling me they liked my little detours into security.  I haven't touch security recently for a number of reasons.  Primarily my research in that area has be temporarily thwarted by PNNL defying the Freedom of Information Act.  A FOIA request I made back in June which only required they make a duplicate of some of the files on a DVD and send it to me.  I told them who had possession of the DVD, the project name, and the markings on the DVD.  Very simple.  None of the material I requested was classified and although it was originally considered Official Use Only that restriction had been lifted before I left and the material used on a proposal for a a completely open project which we won a contract for.  They are in defiance of the law and my FOIA attorney is working on the problem but my involvement in security issues gets sidetracked by my anger over PNNL illegal activities.  Unfortunately FOIA is a law that doesn't have any enforcement teeth.  It's against the law from them to do what they are doing (or rather not doing) but there is no penalties for their illegal activity.  Sort of like making it against the law for you to steal but if you get caught nothing happens--you don't have to give back what you stole and you don't get punished for your crime.

Anyway... sidetracked by my anger again...

Alphecca posted this about Bush authorizing eavesdropping on American citizens and wondered why a lot of the people on the libertarian/conservative side of the Blogosphere quiet or indifferent about it.  I haven't read any news reports that indicated anything of real news.  From my readings (try The Puzzle Palace) and a few hints from other sources the NSA has been doing this for years if not decades.  You shouldn't act as if your electronic traffic is anymore private than if you were to have a conversation on a crowded elevator.  Encrypting your traffic might make it as private as a conversation on a city street.  I try to encrypt a fair portion of my email and encourage others to do the same.  Most of my web browsing travels, at least part way, via encrypted channels.  This is not because anything in the email or my browsing would be a problem for me if it were decrypted but because it raises the cost for the people doing the surveillance.  The more people that do that the more likely they are to concentrate their limited resources on the people that are high probability threats to our national security.  I talked about this at the Gun Rights Policy Conference in 2000 (do a search for "Huffman" on that page).  If I had the time I would work on some other projects that would further consume resources and release them to the public.  Basically, as others have pointed out, you can't legislate restrictions on the government and expect them to obey the law.  Government entities rarely obey the law (see here, here, here, here, and the first paragraph of this post for example) if it's inconvenient for them to do so.  Remember the famous Henry Kissinger quote?  Of course this is the real reason for the 2nd Amendment--a last ditch resort for prevention of tyranny.  But there are other things we can do to help that are much lower cost to us and exact at least a moderate cost from the agents of tyranny.  Encrypting your electronic traffic is one of those things.  It costs them far, far more computing resources to decrypt it that it does for you to encrypt it.

I spent some time catching up on my security reading and came across this on Bruce Schneier's blog:

According to the three-page document, to preserve the openness that characterizes today's Internet, "consumers are entitled to run applications and use services of their choice, subject to the needs of law enforcement." Read the last seven words again.

What the FCC is now saying is that people cannot use encryption technology unless law enforcement has the back-door keys to it.  Of course they have to know encryption is being used before they can stop you from using it or demand you give them the keys to the back-door.  I covered that in my GRPC talk and I already distributed a tool to circumvent them to hundreds of people.  What I haven't done is tell all those hundreds of people about the hidden feature set in the tool--just the ones that paid money for the product.

I should work on some of my other tools.  The price of liberty is eternal vigilance and I need to pay my share of that price.  When the next tool is up and running I'll talk about it more.  In the mean time check out PGP and Thawte.  The cost to you is low and the cost to "them" is high.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 18, 2005 1:42:17 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Sex )

From the Ottawa Sun:

The Supreme Court of Canada is set to rule on whether spouse-swapping in public venues should be a criminal act. The ground-breaking case, which could set new standards for decency in Canadian society, stems from two Montreal "swingers" clubs charged with keeping a bawdy house.

One defendant, James Kouri, ran the Coeur a Corps bar, where couples could hook up by paying a $6 cover charge. Every half hour, a translucent black curtain automatically closed around the dance floor while people took part in, or watched, sex acts.

Kouri was convicted of keeping a common bawdy house and sentenced to pay fines of $500 on the first count and $5,000 on the second. He won acquittal from Quebec's top court, but the other club owner, Jean-Paul Labaye, lost his appeal.

Although there are similar prosecutions happening in the U.S. it's frequently a socialist (when you think about it you realize religion is frequently very socialist) mindset that drives this sort of prosecution.  The people are just cattle to be herded/controlled.  They don't have the brains to make decisions for themselves.  It's for the "greater good" that people are forbidden dominion over their own bodies.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 18, 2005 1:26:52 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics | Quote of the Day )

The people of the various provinces are forbidden to have in their possession any swords, bows, spears, firearms, or other types of arms. The possession of these elements makes difficult the collection of taxes and dues, and tends to permit uprising. Therefore, the heads of provinces, official agents and deputies are ordered to collect all the weapons mentioned above and turn them over to the government.

Toyotomi Hideyoshit
Shogun
August 29, 1558
Japan
[I admire his honest and forthrightness.  If only present day politicians would be so when they demand we turn over our personal protection tools.--Joe]

# Saturday, December 17, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 17, 2005 5:53:27 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights )

Fish Or Man has it posted on his blog now.  It's a worthwhile read.  I'm pretty pleased with it.  Thank you so much Jason.  I know this was a great burden to bear.  We all owe you a big thanks.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 17, 2005 5:42:10 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Sex )

I'm not a big fan of watching sports I don't participate in so I won't be visiting German for any of the activities described below which are planned for next year.  Lots of other people will though and it sounds like people will have lots of fun "making friends" even when they aren't watching 'football':

BERLIN: Prostitutes, many of them from the neighbouring eastern European countries, are expected to flood Berlin and other cities in Germany during next years football World Cup.

...

Prostitution is legalised in Germany, and those involved in it are supposed to register with the authorities, and pay tax and employee health insurance. This also applies to brothel owners.

German capital Berlin, already has close to 10,000 prostitutes working in the city, and this number is expected to be greatly swollen once the World Cup gets underway. The same goes for Leipzig, Dortmund, Munich and Gelsenkirchen, and other cities where games are taking place.

...

A wealthy Turkish nightclub entrepreneur, anticipating a boom in the sex trade business during the World Cup, recently opened a four-storey, 40-room luxury brothel in Berlin's Wilmersdorf district, at a cost of 5 million euros.

The brothel is just three S-Bahn (municipal overhead railway) stops from Berlin's 1936-built Olympic Stadium where key World Cup games will be played, including the final.

Named "Artemis" after the virgin goddess of hunting, the facility is considered a "state-of-the-sex-art" facility. Atop the building, a giant red phallus billows in the wind.

Its owner says that unlike in most other city brothels, the girls active there are free to negotiate their own rates with clients and don't have to pay "pimp money".

Artemis is equipped with a FKK (nude) "Wellness Club", massage, and solarium and a gaily-decorated spiral-ascending stairway. Its owner says entrance costs 7 euros with payment for sex "extra".

"Romy", the establishment's manager, says up to 200-300 men a day have been using its premises in its "opening phase".

Once the World Cup is in progress, "we are considering staying open 24 hours", she says with a broad smile. Massive security will be in operation during next summer's World Cup matches. FIFA officials are saying there will be an unprecedented level of surveillance at matches, so that if violence does flare it can be dealt with swiftly by crowd control experts.

While in city centres a vast body of police will be on duty.

But at Artemis, the staff do not anticipate any trouble at its premises. "We are a pleasure facility," enthused one of the staff.

Hundreds of sex establishments are to be found in Berlin, as well sex cinemas, massage salons, and a huge number of night clubs catering for every kind of saucy, eyebrow-raising late night titillation. In Germany, the World Cup slogan "A time to make friends" can, it seems, be understood in a number of ways.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 17, 2005 4:11:52 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Places Without Guns )

In the U.K. where they are 'more civilized' than we are in the States no one really needs a gun, right?  Wrong:

Four teenagers were "worse than a pack of wild dogs" when they beat a man to death outside his Chinese takeaway, a court was told yesterday.

Michael Chen, 41, was kicked, punched and stamped upon during the attack in a shopping precinct in Wigan.

His assailants struck him on the head so hard with a stake it sounded like a cricket bat striking a ball.

The gang left him dying in the arms of his girlfriend. His life support system was turned off the next day.

Yesterday the teenagers were jailed for up to 10 years at Manchester Crown Court. None showed any reaction as they were taken from the dock.

...

Passing sentence, Mr Justice Royce told them: "You acted far worse than a pack of wild dogs. The sheer savagery and brutality of the attack… aggravates the offence. It is the sort of street violence that should not be tolerated in any civilised society."

...

Frightened by the youths gathering in the precinct, Mr Chen, his girlfriend, Eileen, and the restaurant's chef armed themselves with a spade, a wooden stake and sticks.

But they were quickly outnumbered and cornered by about a dozen youths, including the four who would eventually conclude the attack.

They needed to arm themselves with rifles and/or shotguns not sticks.  Firearms, of course, are severely restricted in the U.K.  The U.K. politicians who committed the crime against humanity by taking guns away from the victims should have also been on trial and sentenced here.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 17, 2005 3:59:44 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights )

Now that Canada is planning a near complete ban on handguns (the police and maybe some target shooters will be allowed to keep them) what's next?  We didn't have wait long before finding out.  From the Hamilton Spectator (Ontario):

Think we've got too many gun-control laws in this country? I don't think we have enough.

Not with the news that the man accused of shooting Laval police Constable Valerie Gignac on Wednesday morning may have had legal access to a hunting gun capable of taking down an elephant.

...

Wendy Cukier, a Ryerson University professor of information technology, and co-founder of the Coalition for Gun Control, agrees. "It reinforces our continued theme about the implementation of the law, and belies the notion that plain old hunting rifles are not a problem.

"Many don't know they can pierce body armour and shoot bullets 2 km -- after all, the Tories say, they are just tools!"

In fact, misinformation about gun crime is rife. Think police are shot by city gangs with handguns from the U.S.? The last police officer shot in Toronto was shot by a disturbed man with his legally owned shotgun, while four RCMP constables were shot dead in Mayerthorpe, Alta., last March by a man on a farm who reportedly had a military-style assault rifle, a hunting rifle and a pistol when he was found dead -- despite a 10-year firearm prohibition against him.

Cukier should be a familiar name to readers here.  Do a search for "Cukier" on this blog for more info on her.

They are "priming the pump" for the obvious next step--banning firearms used for hunting.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 17, 2005 3:44:19 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Politics | Quote of the Day )

I guess I kind of believe in gun control: You control your gun, and I'll control mine.

Brian Schweitzer
Governor of Montana
An avid hunter who has "more guns than I need but not as many as I want."
The Boston Globe December 17, 2005
[For a Boston paper this is an excellent article on guns.  My only criticism is they seem to think guns are only about hunting.--Joe]

# Friday, December 16, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 16, 2005 11:49:20 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom )

I just thought some of the people opposed to the war against the Islamic extremists would want to know about this:

KABUL, Afghanistan (Reuters) -- Suspected Taliban guerrillas dragged a teacher from a classroom of teenagers in southern Afghanistan and killed him at the school gate after he ignored their orders to stop teaching girls, police said on Friday.

...

The fundamentalist Taliban banned education of girls during their rule before being overthrown by U.S.-led forces in 2001.

The guerrillas have carried out a series of attacks in the provinces on schools teaching girls since them, often burning them down at night.

{sarcasm}I suppose a case can be made for keeping women in their proper place.  We certainly have learned our lesson in this country--women got so uppity they demanded the right to vote and look at the mess that caused.{/sarcasm}

I don't think the anti-war people in this country have a clue as to what we are up against.  This is a culture that not only wants to repress their own people but insists that we adhere to their religion tenets as well.  They gave us our choice, as their religion demands, "convert, submit, or fight."  Trying to negotiate, insisting "war is always wrong" or "there is always another way" is willful ignorance or such a blind hatred of our freedoms (usually it's capitalism) they are willing to side with these extremists who rather see us all dead than to suffer our enjoyment of freedom from their religion.  Read the transcripts of the demands by Osama bin Laden and those that are beheading innocent victims.  Then get a grip on reality and chose the only option we have--fight them with prisons, bullets, and explosives.

By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 16, 2005 7:42:37 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Quote of the Day )

The first and basic premise of paganism, socialism, and Molech worship is its claim that the state owns the child. The basic premise of the public schools is this claim of ownership, a fact some parents are encountering in the courts. It is the essence of paganism to claim first the lives of the children, then the properties of the people.

R.J. Rushdoony

# Thursday, December 15, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:28:04 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights )

Details are here but the short version is that without the help of a lawyer or any gun rights organization Fish Or Man won his appeal against Ellensburg for carrying a pistol openly in public (in a Fred Meyer store).  I'm not a lawyer and I'm not about to test it tomorrow, but I think this means we can openly carry a handgun, without a CPL, in Washington state.

Way to go!!!!!

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 15, 2005 9:03:36 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

What the subcommittee on the Constitution uncovered was clear -- and long lost -- proof that the Second Amendment to our Constitution was intended as an individual right of the American citizen to keep and carry arms in a peaceful manner, for protection of himself, his family, and his freedoms.

Senator Orrin Hatch
Chairman, Subcommittee on the Constitution,
Preface, The Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

# Wednesday, December 14, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:47:48 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights )

From the clueless Gun Guys:

 It’s not like we ever took anything CCRKBA said seriously (after all, it is run by Alan “Tina” Gottlieb)...

"Tina"?  A play on "tiny" because Alan is rather short?

Probably it's because they can't think of anything factual or rational to say about the CCRKBA.  They have to resort to name calling to make themselves feel better.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:28:53 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Sex )

"Anything you want me to pick up at the grocery store on the way home honey?" 

"Yes.  I'm fixing a special desert tonight.  Would you please bring home an aersol can of whipped cream, a Pocket Rocket vibrator, and package of AA batteries?" 

From news.telegraph:

Asda is to become the first supermarket to stock sex toys, after striking a deal with Durex over its range of vibrators and lubricants.

The move follows Superdrug's decision to stock the toys.

The supermarket chain, which promises that the products will be on a high shelf, out of the reach of children.

Catherine Gort, Durex's marketing manager, said that the decision was a "sure sign that as a nation we have become more at ease with our sex lives".

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 14, 2005 8:06:43 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights )

The Seattle PI reports:

In an effort to drum up support for a proposal requiring background checks on those who buy firearms at gun shows, a gun control advocacy group reported a survey strongly supporting the idea. 

Washington Ceasefire conducted the survey, asking 403 registered voters whether they would be more or less likely to support candidates who wanted to close a loophole in state law that allows gun sales without background checks at gun shows.

...

Current state law allows people to buy firearms at gun shows without a background check, although federal law requires such checks when the firearm is sold at a store.

There is a problem with this article.  This last sentence is false.  And I'm willing to bet (an extremely rare thing for me to do) the survey takers worded their question(s) in such a way that they mislead the people being surveyed in a similar manner. 

The truth is Federal law does not even define a gun show let along make some sort of exception for them.  The laws that apply at a gun store apply at a gun show, the parking lot at the mall, and your backyard.  There is a reason these people lie--the truth is painful to them.  They cannot hope to get their way if they stick to the truth.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 14, 2005 7:48:30 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Current News | Gun Rights | Sex )

I'm surprised this is occurring in Iowa.  California, Massachusetts, and even Washington state.  But Iowa?  Apparently the Iowa constitution looks friendly to the pursuit of gay marriage via the courts. 

DES MOINES -- A gay rights group filed a lawsuit on behalf of six gay and lesbian couples Tuesday in Polk County District Court, asking for the right to marry for same-sex couples.

Lambda Legal, which has spearheaded the same-sex marriage drive across the country, said it wants full recognition of the civil rights of same-sex couples.

I'm all for gay marriage but I'm not comfortable with it being implemented via the courts.  I would prefer that it happen legislatively or via a popular vote of the people.  Particularly when it is indisputable that the original intent of the constitution or law being utilized was that marriage only be for men and women.  The original intent may have been wrong but there is a procedure for changing it that should be utilized.  Changing the meaning via the courts is just wrong.  Freedom of the press could just as easily come to mean the government printing office has the freedom to print the news but private or corporate "press" is not.  You think it couldn't happen?  Look at what has happened with the Second Amendment.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 14, 2005 7:29:58 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day | Sex )

Our laws can be friendly to those who obey them, and too often useful to those who don't.
    
Cullen Hightower
[Among the most useful laws to those that disobey them are the laws that attempt to ban or restrict goods or services.  The black market always finds a way whether it is something physical like booze, guns or recreational drugs or some service such as high interest loans (loan sharking), gambling or prostitution.--Joe]

# Tuesday, December 13, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:55:31 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Home Life )

It's been cold in Moscow recently-- then the fog rolled in.  The result was everything became covered in ice crystals.  Xenia has the pictures.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:50:52 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Home Life | PNNL )

I previously reported PNNL screwed up a corporate American Express account I had at PNNL by not forwarding the bills to me after my wrongful termination.  I received a bill from American Express last month then tried to call AE a couple times and had the call dropped or otherwise wasn't able to get things straightened out.  Honestly, I didn't put much effort into it.  I would get so angry over it that I just wanted to ignore it.  I got another bill on Saturday and opened it up yesterday.  Surprise!  The bill has been paid.  I presume someone at PNNL read my posting (I know some of them do read my blog) and made sure it got taken care of at that end.

Whoever you are, thank you.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 13, 2005 5:10:36 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics | Quote of the Day )

Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise.

Adolf Hitler
[For my readers, see Dan's comment, that don't "feel" people living under restrictive gun laws are oppressed.--Joe]

# Monday, December 12, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 12, 2005 9:36:21 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Places Without Guns | Sex )

If this had been in a gun friendly state in the U.S. these scumbags would be suffering from acute lead poisoning after about the second "unannounced visit" and the expected winners of the next Darwin awards.  Instead they invaded several homes before getting caught and will get another chance to invade homes after they get out.

A Dublin man was tonight sentenced to nine years in jail for trying to force a young woman to have sex with her flatmate and then cutting her with a knife.

Stephen Phelan, 20, from Poddle Close in Kimmage was found guilty of aggravated sexual assault and assault causing harm to the woman by a jury in June.

At the sentencing hearing, Judge Phillip O’Sullivan also imposed concurrent sentences ranging from three to seven years for 17 other offences carried out on the same night.

On February 11 2003, Phelan and an accomplice began a spree of burglaries which led to the sexual assault, the stabbing of a student nine times and the crashing of a car into a Dublin Bus.

Judge O’Sullivan said Phelan had been involved in a series of violent incidents and outlined the impact on his victims: post traumatic stress disorder, the loss of power in an arm, permanent scar wounds and a fear of sleeping alone at night.

“No summary of mine can do justice to the trauma suffered by these people,” he said.

He imposed a five-year probation sentence on Phelan to commence on his release, after hearing from a psychiatrist who said he had serious reservations about him getting out into society again under the influence of drugs.

Phelan had been spending €1500-€1600 euro a day on crack cocaine and had been using robberies to fund his habit.

Detective Sergeant George McGeary said Phelan and his accomplice, who has since fled the jurisdiction, had broken into a house in Harold’s Cross, where four people were living, including the young woman.

They armed themselves with a screwdriver, a Stanley knife, a Swiss army knife, a dumb-bell and a hacksaw.

After searching the house for property and money, Phelan went into the bedroom of a 24-year-old tenant. She screamed when she saw him and shouted at her flatmate to get her trousers.

The court heard he came into the room and told her: “Give us what we want or we’ll cut you.”

He was unable to find her ATM card and told her to take off her clothes, where he believed she was concealing it.

Later in the burglary, he came back into her room and told her to lie down on the bed or he would cut her nipples.

She refused several times to take off her clothes but then Phelan came back, held a knife to her throat and told her to ’take off her f*****g clothes’.

Detective Sergeant McGeary told the court that she was crying while she took her trouser bottoms off.

He used his knife to cut off her underwear and then told her to have sex with one of her two male flatmates.

He refused, saying “She’s my friend” but was then cut twice on the upper arm in a X shape.

The young woman was then ordered into the bedroom of another flatmate, who had been forced to lie naked on the bed.

Phelan told them to have sex together and they kissed, pretending to have sex.

Phelan then cut the woman’s buttocks with a knife and also made a cut running from the top of her back to the base.

Detective Sergeant McGeary told the court that the flatmates had been terrified by Phelan’s threats.

Home invasions are rare where people's rights to defend themselves are not infringed by oppressive governments.  And this is just a hint of some of the things that happen.

By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 12, 2005 8:32:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Technology )

In case you hadn't noticed the identical ads on so many different blogs, including the second one from the top here on the right.  Here is the story:

The MSNBC cable network plans to flood the Internet this week with its largest concentrated online pitch, running advertising on hundreds of Web sites and blogs. The cost of the campaign, to promote three prime-time programs, is estimated at just under $1 million.

There's more to the story but basically they are trying to see if they can drive traffic from the internet to their cable channel.  They are advertising on 800 different blogs.  I wish I was getting 1/800 of $1,000,000 but I'm not.  I'm far, far cheaper than that.  So far they have had 24 clicks from 313 page views.  That, 7.67%, is a rather outstanding click through rate.  My boomershoot ad only gets 1.73% and the t-shirt ad currently on top gets 2.94%.

By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 12, 2005 12:05:00 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Boomershoot | Freedom | Gun Rights )

I don't know if this is something to be looking out for or if it's just some random event. But from watching my sitemeter I discovered the following. The ATF ("Executive Office of the Asset Forfeiture" no less!) just did a web search for the words {exploding targets}.  Regardless of their intent I doubt that it will affect Boomershoot much since we don't sell them just provide the opportunity to shoot at them.  But it might affect Tannerite and others.  Or it could just be they wanted to purchase some for their own amusement.  Further conjecture on my part would be unwarranted.

Domain Name   atfonline.gov ? (United States Government)
IP Address   199.196.144.# (Executive Office of Asset Forfeiture)
199.196.144.17
ISP   Executive Office of Asset Forfeiture
Location  
Continent  :  North America
Country  :  United States  (Facts)
State  :  Virginia
City  :  Dulles
Lat/Long  :  39.0853, -77.6452 (Map)
Language   English (United States)
en-us
Operating System   Microsoft Win2000
Browser   Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)
Javascript   version 1.3
Monitor  
Resolution  :  1024 x 768
Color Depth  :  32 bits
Time of Visit   Dec 12 2005 11:28:00 am
Last Page View   Dec 12 2005 11:29:42 am
Visit Length   1 minute 42 seconds
Page Views   2
Referring URL
http://www.dogpile.c...7/top/-/Moderate/0/1
Visit Entry Page   http://blog.joehuffm...ploding Targets.aspx
Visit Exit Page   http://blog.joehuffm...merite II Tests.aspx
Time Zone   UTC-6:00
CST - Central Standard Time
CDT - Central Daylight Saving Time
Visitor's Time   Dec 12 2005 1:28:00 pm
Visit Number   52,344
By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 12, 2005 5:00:13 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics | Quote of the Day )

My generation of Canadians grew up believing that, if we were very good or very smart, we would someday graduate from Canada.

Robert Fulford
[Particularily relevant now with the proposed ban on handguns in Canada.--Joe]

# Sunday, December 11, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 11, 2005 6:51:55 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Sex )

I believe this was entirely mishandled.  I would have used my camera (the cell phone camera if nothing else) to take pictures for the web.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 11, 2005 6:39:57 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Current News | Freedom | Gun Rights )

It's too early to know for certain if it was an accident or if it was terrorism.  And even if it was determined to be terrorism there is a good chance that knowledge would be restricted.  In any case, it sure was a big explosion (latest news here):

A series of explosions rocked a major oil depot just north of London just before dawn Sunday, injuring 36 people.

Huge balls of fire shot into the sky and the area was filled with clouds of thick, black smoke.

People living nearby have been forced to leave their homes in Hemel Hempstead.

Some residents said they heard a small plane flying overhead just before the first blast. But Hertfordshire police said rumours that the aircraft was involved were unfounded.

Witnesses said there were three explosions at the Buncefield fuel depot. The blasts were heard as far away as the Netherlands.

Some firefighters said that this was the biggest fire they've ever tackled.

Thick clouds of smoke were spreading to the southeast and southwest, but were not believed to be toxic.

The oil depot supplies fuel for a large part of southeast England. However, a spokesperwosn for oil giant BP said there would be no problems with fuel shortages.

And if it does happen that it was a terrorist attack the VPC and Brady Bunch should take note that this sort of thing happens even where .50 BMG's are banned.  It's the people not the guns.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 11, 2005 5:54:11 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Politics )

It's not much, but it's a start:

READING, England -- During his training to become a British police officer, Ben Johnson recalled, an instructor told him and other recruits, "If you ever see somebody carrying a gun, turn and run away as quickly as possible."

"It was a bizarre situation," said Johnson, 34, a former police officer in Garland, Tex., and U.S. Army soldier who moved here with his British wife three years ago and became this country's first non-British police officer. He said running from trouble was exactly the opposite of what he learned as an American cop.

Now Johnson is publicly challenging one of the great traditions of law enforcement in Britain, what he calls the "old-fashioned idea of the unarmed bobby on the beat." He has written to his chief asking for permission to carry a gun, arguing that Britain is no longer safe for unarmed and under-trained police officers. He says he will resign if the chief refuses.

Johnson's case has caused a media furor here, partly because an American -- a Texan no less -- is claiming he feels less safe as a police officer in Britain than he did on the beat in the United States, which is routinely portrayed here as a gun-drunk Wild West.

...

Britain has some of the world's toughest gun-control laws, and violent crime, while increasing, is still far less common than in the United States. There were 184 murders last year in London, a city of more than 7 million people, compared with 572 in New York City, which has 8 million people.

...

"The U.K. is changing rapidly, and the police have been slow to adapt," said Johnson, 6-foot-4 and razor thin, cradling his infant daughter in his lap in the dining room of his neat row house. "We should value the lives of police officers enough to properly equip them and train them to do the job -- even if that means getting rid of some old-fashioned notions."

He said he had 36 weeks of academy training and supervised field work to become a police officer in Texas. But at Thames Valley he said he received less than half that, and most of the instruction involved how to fill out paperwork.

Johnson said British officers are instructed to retreat if they see a gun and call for backup from armed officers, but that can give suspects time to escape.

I love how they compare the entire U.K. London, with tough gun control laws, to NYC also with tough gun control laws.  Why not compare it to the states of Washington and Idaho combined?  Those states are almost friendly to gun owners and the right to self defense.  They have about the same population and a good mix of urban and rural areas.  Why?  Because it's the Washington Post and they have an agenda.  Here is a comparison they could have done:

Washington and Idaho Population according to the 2000 census: 5894143 + 1293953 => 7188096
Washington and Idaho murders and non-negligent manslaughter (FBI Year 2000 UCR): 196 + 16 => 212.

So, even with the "gun-drunk" Wild West states of Washington and Idaho the number of murders is comparable.  Could it be that something other than rate of gun ownership is the dominate factor?  Any sane person would conclude that, but the anti-gun bigots aren't sane.  That there is even a debate about keeping policemen disarmed in the U.K. is further proof of that nationwide case of Hoplophobia.  Fortunately there is help--if they would just take advantage of it.

Update: My mistake.  The Washington post comparison was London to NYC, not the entire UK to NYC.  I'll update with city to city murder rates when I have more time.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 11, 2005 12:02:07 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Quote of the Day )

If it can't be expressed in figures, it is not science; it is opinion.

Robert Heinlein
[One of my favorite Heinlein quotes.--Joe]

# Saturday, December 10, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 10, 2005 11:41:30 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights )

It's an exceedingly rare event when I encourage people to help Washington Ceasefire rather than Washington Ceasefear.  But this is one of those rare times.  Ceasefire is conducting a poll.  The question of the poll is: "How serious do you think handgun violence is in Washington?"  Currently the results of the poll (on the main page, this may not last long) are:

Answer Votes Percentage
Not at all serious: 14 60.%
Very serious: 6 26.1%
Somewhat serious: 2 8.7%
Not very serious: 1 4.3%
A little serious: 0 0.0%

There are so few votes it's not a good statistical sample.  Why don't we help them out?  And just to be fair--only vote once.

Update (04:20, December 12, 2005): Analog Kid posted about the poll and his readers helped out too.  Thanks to everyone that participated. Here are the latest results:

Answer Votes Percentage
Not at all serious: 425 77.6%
Not very serious: 83 15.1%
Very serious: 27 4.9%
A little serious: 11 8.7%
Somewhat serious: 2 0.4%
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 10, 2005 1:33:15 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Boomershoot | Freedom | Gun Rights )

Considering recent news from Canada and the real reason for Boomershoot I have decided to give Canadians entering Boomershoot 2006 a rebate of one half the price their entry fee.  Payable upon showing their Canadian drivers license or other proof of Canadian citizenship at Boomershoot 2006.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 10, 2005 12:10:52 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Quote of the Day )

Those who sell their liberty for security are understandable, if pitiable, creatures. Those who sell the liberty of others for wealth, power, or even a moment's respite deserve only the end of a rope.

L. Neil Smith

# Friday, December 09, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 09, 2005 9:42:16 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

Happiness is being near the top of the food chain.

Back of a T-shirt worn by
Greg Hamilton
Self defense and firearms instructor
September 15, 1997
[Also applicable to the truth laid bear ecosystem for blogs.--Joe]

# Thursday, December 08, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 08, 2005 9:36:33 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Home Life )

The new address is http://captjason.blogspot.com.  I have also created a backup site that I will update about once a week so we don't lose all the postings and comments if something catastrophic happens to blogspot.com.  The backup site is http://www.joehuffman.org/Jason.

This post will stay at the top for one week.  See below for newer postings.

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 08, 2005 7:05:43 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Sex )

The following story reminds me of this old joke:

I went to the County Fair. They had one of those "Believe it or not?" shows.

They had a man born with a penis and a brain.

Here's the story:

Syracuse University biology professor Scott Pitnick knows a lot about the birds and the bees (or in this case, bats). He teaches courses in evolution and population biology, and researches topics such as sexual selection, sexual conflict and speciation. His latest research sheds light on a little-explored area of evolutionary biology: the contribution of sexual selection to brain evolution. “The brain can be considered the most important ‘sex organ,’” says Pitnick. “Nevertheless, the relationship between breeding system and relative brain size has received little investigation.”

A recent study by Pitnick and colleagues Kate Jones of the Institute of Zoology at the Zoological Society of London and Jerry Wilkinson of the Department of Biology at the University of Maryland was funded by the National Science Foundation and used comparative analysis to show that bat species that roost in larger social groups and those with promiscuous females have relatively smaller brains than species with females that are faithful to their mates. Male infidelity, by contrast, had no evolutionary impact on relative brain size.

According to Pitnick, a likely explanation for this relationship relates to the energetic demands of producing and maintaining both brain and sperm cells; males cannot afford a lot of both. Under this explanation, males with relatively large testes and small brains leave more offspring than larger-brained, less fertile, competitors.

“When females mate with more than one male, sperm compete to fertilize the female’s eggs. Such ‘sperm competition’ is rife in many bat species, perhaps due in part to the unusual ability (among mammals at least) of sperm to survive inside the female’s reproductive tract for a very long time,” says Pitnick. “The
male who ejaculates the greatest number of sperm may win at this game, and hence many bats have evolved outrageously big testes—as much as 8.5% of their body mass. Because they live on an energetic knife-edge, bats may not be able to evolutionarily afford both big testes and big brains. We’re excited about these results, as they may stimulate more research into the correlated evolution of brains, behavior and the extravagant and costly ornaments and armaments favored by sexual selection.”

The full results of Pitnick’s study have recently been published in Proceedings B (London) a biology journal of the Royal Society, the United Kingdom’s national academy of science.

You know what this means, don't you?  If someone says you have big balls they are also saying you are pea brain and your mother was promiscuous.

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:21:19 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics )

Yahoo News reports:

OTTAWA (CP) - Prime Minister Paul Martin will venture into a violence-plagued area of Toronto on Thursday to announce a sweeping ban on handguns, The Canadian Press has learned.

Martin was scheduled to visit Toronto's troubled Jane-Finch area to make a "safer communities announcement." Liberal sources have confirmed the announcement includes an "outright" ban on handguns.

However, there will be exceptions for competitive target shooters, gun collectors and peace officers, a Liberal insider said on condition of anonymity. The source would not explain any more details of the policy proposal.

Handguns are already severely restricted in Canada and a handgun registry has been in force for more than 60 years.

...

Windsor MP Joe Comartin, the New Democratic Party's justice critic, said the announcement sounds like "smoke and mirrors."

"Basically, all handguns in Canada are illegal now," said Comartin. "The only people who get permits are those who are using them for recreational purposes or those who need it for their own personal safety and there's not a lot of those that are granted."

He said the announcement sounds like "a political ploy during an election to garner some headlines and make it look like you're actually doing something when, in fact, what you're proposing is pretty meaningless."

...

It remains to be seen how the ban will go over in rural areas, where the issue is more about rifles. Many Prairie rifle owners have never forgiven the Liberals for creating a registry for long guns.

Created 10 years ago, the registry was supposed to cost a mere $2 million. Instead, its cost has ballooned to more than $1 billion.

The Conservatives, who declined comment on the expected handgun ban Wednesday, have called the program a boondoggle and Auditor General Sheila Fraser has sharply criticized the waste and mismanagment that have pervaded the registry.

Gun owners warned at the time that the registry was the first step toward confiscation of their guns. Martin's announcement may be seen as confirmation of their worst fears.

...

Wendy Cukier, who co-founded the Coalition for Gun Control after the Montreal massacre, said the government has yet to live up to previous promises to ban the AR-15 semi-assault rifle and the Ruger Mini-14, the same weapon used in the Polytechnique shootings.

But she said existing laws limiting the use of rifles and shotguns have been successful.

"Overall gun death and injury in Canada is way down," Cukier said. "Where we've actually seen a slight increase is in murders with handguns and so clearly our existing laws are not addressing the handgun problem and something is needed."

...

"It's going to accomplish nothing," said Wayne Fields of LaSalle, Ont., president of the Law-Abiding Registered Firearms Association. "There's already all types of legislation and illegal use of handguns is out of control."

Quick correction, it should be Law-Abiding Unregistered Firearms Association.

I've commented on Cukier before (and here, and here). I'm certain she is not ignorant on this issue, I think James has her pegged, and she is deliberately misleading when she says "gun death and injury in Canada is way down".  That's not the issue.  The issue is what is the total crime rate?  As you restrict weapons the population at large is made less safe because criminals have a safer working environment.  You have reduced the total cost to being a criminal.  A criminal can be successful simply by being large, strong, or armed with a simpler and/or cheaper weapon.  If you could magically eliminate all firearms from the planet you could set the firearm death rate to zero but the total murder rate could climb.  There is Just One Question at issue here and Cukier dodges it.

And of course assurances by the anti-freedom bigots that a gun registry won't be used for confiscation are worthless.  That is the only thing it is good for.

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 08, 2005 5:37:21 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

Gun bans are an attempt to confiscate the right of self-defense.  Politicians perennially react to the police's total failure to control crime by trying to disarm law-abiding citizens.  In a nutshell, gun bans mean that because criminals abuse guns, law-abiding citizen have no right to defend themselves.

James Bovard
Lost Rights
ISBN 0-312-12333-7
Copyright 1994, 1995

# Wednesday, December 07, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 07, 2005 11:25:13 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Home Life )

I have been a fan of Oleg Volk's photographs for many years.  These are some fairly new ones:

http://www.olegvolk.net/gallery/arms/guncontrol4677
http://www.olegvolk.net/gallery/arms/swordmaidentwo5009
http://www.olegvolk.net/gallery/arms/allpink4803

I think my daughter Xenia would especially like the second one.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 07, 2005 11:07:09 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights )

I don't read much of AR15.com--mostly just when I see hits coming in on Boomershoot.org from it.  Today this link was posted on an public folder at work.  Some of the AR-15.com crowd claim it's the funniest post ever.  It could be--it's very good.  But you probably have to be a moderately well trained gun person to get the totality of the humor.

Aside from the humor there are some important lessons to be learned from the pictures and the comments.  I'll leave those lessons unstated so that it is less likely inappropriate people learn them.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 07, 2005 10:58:23 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom )

I ran across the following comment today.  As I am a great fan of understatment as well as sick humor I just had to share:

History will show that being nuked repeatedly has great calming influence on the "We should rule the world because it's our divine right" types.

Sort of like Greg Hamilton's "Universal Hand Signal" for "lie down" as applied to individuals.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:04:03 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom )

Samantha Burns is looking for PC alternatives for the names of various types of terrorists.  The moonbats don't like being called animal-rights terrorists, ecoterrorist, etc.  Any idea?  I'll have to think about it some but I think it's a worthy endeavor.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, December 07, 2005 12:00:18 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Quote of the Day )

People may be ignorant, yes. But it is a willful ignorance. They don’t want the truth. No matter how many times I explain they are wrong, no matter how much evidence I give them they don’t care. Their belief makes them feel good and that’s good enough for them.

And this understanding of people’s willful ignorance leads directly to my lack of faith in humanity. I don’t trust people to fix the political system, I don’t trust people to see religion for what it is, I don’t trust people to see the truth that is in front of them, and I don’t trust people to be smart. People don’t want to question their beliefs, they’re happy being ignorant and it doesn’t matter how much I argue with them they won’t change. Therefore they are not worth my time. The majority of mankind doesn’t care for truth and so I don’t care for them.

James Huffman-Scott
Speech for Comm 101
2001
From http://www.joehuffman.org/misc/LifeChange.htm

# Tuesday, December 06, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:56:35 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Sex )

Probably not something you would give your mother.  And not recommended for office wear--except maybe at Planned Parenthood.  100% latex condoms.

Thanks to Samatha Burns for pointing this out.  She has links to other clothes made with condoms here.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 06, 2005 7:43:15 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Sex )

I'm disappointed. The New York Times headline says, "Where an Orgy of Shopping Meets Shopping for an Orgy".  Cool.  I'll take three orgies for Christmas gifts (I have interesting friends), can I have them gift wrapped?  I was disappointed to find:

SAN FRANCISCO, Dec. 4 - The season of the holiday shopping orgy has arrived. In San Francisco on Sunday, they took it literally.

"Holidays are a time for intimacy," said Carol Leigh, a k a Scarlet Harlot, a pink-haired former call girl who was selling her own brand of perfume, Whore Magic, along with feather boas and other "sex positive" gifts at the holiday bazaar at the Center for Sex and Culture. "It's winter, so it's time to keep warm."

While shoppers in suburban malls trolled the aisles for iPods and salad spinners, at the Belle Bizarre, as it was called, they could pick up a used copy of Sophocles's "Oedipus Cycle," a Delta Burke bustier, a Post-it-note-style pastie, or a candy garter belt or G-string, a new spin on candy necklaces sold at Kissable Cutie, a booth operated by Contessa Carlton, a professional escort.

It is probably safe to say that the average American mall would not feature a sign that said "U.S. Out of My Underwear."

The bazaar, where Santa Claus was not spotted, was a benefit for the sex and culture center, a nonprofit organization that specializes in adult sex education programs. The money raised from the sale of geisha hair clips, suede chokers and the like is to help finance the center's Exotic Dancers Education Project, a support program for sex workers that addresses issues like filing taxes and "avoiding sex worker burnout."

There's more but it wasn't much more interesting.  The local shops in the Seattle area sound just as interesting.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:58:19 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

Real men use guns made of metal and use other people’s teeth to rack the slide.

Bill Boyle
Monday, December 05, 2005 2:33 PM
Microsoft Gun Club
After someone else suggested using his teeth to rack the slide on his polymer pistol if one hand was incapacitated.

# Monday, December 05, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 05, 2005 10:49:07 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Home Life )

As long time readers will know I watch my log files pretty close.  In the last month or two I have had occasion to be amused at some of the things I found.  For example I found the U.S. Justice Department doing a Google search for {"sheriff's office" "clearwater county" idaho}.  I sent an email to the sheriff with the details.  In addition to just being a neighborly thing to do, Boomershoot is held in Clearwater County and I like staying on the good side of the people in the office.

I found another search by the IRS for {nancy amos}.  I don't know if they were looking for the same Nancy that is my sister-in-law, but I was amused to send her an email telling her that it was.

Today I ran across something far more amusing.  Someone, at the IRS, did a search for Ayn Rand quotes:

Domain Name   irs.gov ? (United States Government)
IP Address   152.216.7.# (INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE)
152.216.7.5
ISP   INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Location  
Continent  :  North America
Country  :  United States  (Facts)
State  :  District of Columbia
City  :  Washington
Lat/Long  :  38.8933, -77.0146 (Map)
Language   English (United States)
en-us
Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
Browser   Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Javascript   version 1.3
Monitor  
Resolution  :  800 x 600
Color Depth  :  32 bits
Time of Visit   Dec 5 2005 9:54:12 am
Last Page View   Dec 5 2005 9:54:12 am
Visit Length   0 seconds
Page Views   1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...en&lr=&start=50&sa=N
Search Engine google.com
Search Words quotations from ayn rand books
Visit Entry Page   http://blog.joehuffm...Ayn Rand Quotes.aspx
Visit Exit Page   http://blog.joehuffm...Ayn Rand Quotes.aspx
Time Zone   UTC-5:00
EST - Eastern Standard
EDT - Eastern Daylight Saving Time
Visitor's Time   Dec 5 2005 12:54:12 pm
Visit Number   51,048
 
The irony of the IRS being interested in what Ayn Rand has to say is quite delicious.
By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 05, 2005 10:33:04 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom )

I received these via email.  Interesting stuff:

http://www.anti-cair-net.org

http://www.hvk.org/articles/1202/200.html

 

 

 

 

 

By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 05, 2005 8:32:28 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Current News | Politics )

The Toronta Star says a brutal winter with colder than normal temperatures is coming.  Contrast that with the CBC story on all the people marching in downtown Montreal urging our government to sign the Kyoto treaty to prevent global warming.  The CBC story, even a single sentence all by itself, is an amusing contrast:

Thousands of people marched in frigid temperatures through downtown Montreal on Saturday as part of worldwide rallies to urge the United States and other countries to do more to curb global warming.

And people wonder why we call them barking moonbats.

By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 05, 2005 8:07:18 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Boomershoot )

Boomershoot 2006 just got a mention on Survival Blog.  There weren't any permalinks that I could find so it's on the main page for now and probably will go into the December Archives at the beginning of next month.  This blog is written by James Wesley, Rawles.  Rawles wrote an interesting book that is a cult classic in survivalist circles.  It has gone through numerous versions and titles.  Currently it's called Patriots: Surviving the Coming Collapse.  Starting in about 1998 (I think it was in the version called "TEOTWAWKI" (The End Of The World As We Know It) Rawles gave credit to me under the name, which he chose, "Huff the dynamite shooter" for comments I made on previous versions.  I couldn't see that he used any of my suggestions but it was nice that he made mention of my input.

The novel takes place just a few miles from where I currently live near Moscow Idaho.  It's an interesting read even if there are some errors and oversights that I find distracting.

By: Joe Huffman Monday, December 05, 2005 7:23:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Quote of the Day )

If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of caring for them, they will be happy.

Thomas Jefferson
[We failed.--Joe]

# Sunday, December 04, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 04, 2005 3:32:18 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Boomershoot | Freedom | Gun Rights )

It's time for me to create the next Boomershoot t-shirt (and mugs, hats, thongs, etc.).  If you have a slogan you think would especially appropriate let me know and if I use it I'll give you a free shirt, mug, whatever with that slogan on it.

Send your entry to slogan@boomershoot.org.  Enter as many times as you like.  I will be the final judge on what is used.  All whiners complaining about not winning will receive an ammonium nitrate prill as a consolation prize if they show up at Boomershoot 2006 to claim it (valued at $250/ton--one prill weighs approximately 1 grain).  Boomershoot helpers, friends and family members are all welcome to submit entries.  Deadline is December 15, 2005.  Here are previous years slogans:

  • 2001--THE BIG BANG!
  • 2002--Guns.  Explosives.  I was there.
  • 2003--Project Fireball 2003
  • 2004--A ton of explosives.  Fun beyond measure.
  • 2005--Exercise your freedom with guns and explosives.

Update: The slogans proposed so far.  I don't want people entering duplicates:

  • BANG -- BOOM -- COOL!
  • A practical alternative to a wholesome day at work. [I think I would change this to "A wholesome alternative to a practical day at work."--Joe]
  • A magical land full of rifles and explosives.
  • Good marksmanship has EXPLOSIVE rewards!
  • WHOO-WEE! That blowed up REAL GOOD!  [obscure SCTV reference]
  • Take your shot from the Grassy Knoll.  [get all sorts of Google traffic from JFK theorists.]
  • The smell of cordite. The sound of thunder.
  • Heads up! Here comes the anvil!
  • Prometheus suffered so you could do stuff like this. Don't be ungrateful.
  • Welcome to Joe's World!
  • Freedom smells like gunpowder
  • Feinstein's worst nightmare: Families. Guns. Fun.
  • Sight alignment, trigger squeeze, holy shit!
  • Guns, Explosives, and the Pursuit of Happiness
  • Blow Shiite up
  • Famous potatoes explosives
  • Reach Out And Blow Something Up
  • This is my target.  There are many like it.  But this one explodes!  [based on the Rifleman's Creed]
  • Peace Through Superior Marksmanship [I think I would change this to "Freedom Through Superior Marksmanship"--Joe]
  • The blood of the enemy!
  • Vini. Vidi. Boom. [I came. I saw. I blew stuff up.]
  • Don't know Jesus??? I'll make ya Holey !!! Braaappp....
  • Peace, Love, Explosives and Guns.
  • Got boom?
  • Got kaboom?
  • If you don't get it, then never mind.
  • Life, liberty, and the pursuit of kaboom...
  • I shit you not - we shoot bombs. [Hint to others.  We NEVER use the 'B' word at Boomershoot.--Joe]
  • We shoot bombs. [Ditto the previous comment.]
  • Get a big BANG for your buck.
By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 04, 2005 3:13:53 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Politics | Sex )

They aren't technically calling it marriage but there is no legal distinction between the two.  Read about it here.  Many of my conservative readers will disagree with my libertarian viewpoint on this but I think it's a good thing.  Marriage (the first 29 years anyway) has been good for me and I expect it will be good for others even if they happen to be of the same gender as their partner.  And what is good for the average individual is almost always good for society.  I've posted on this topic before and don't need to expound on it much again:

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:36:21 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights )

Click on the image for variations on the theme.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, December 04, 2005 7:20:03 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Quote of the Day )

Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded--here and there, now and then--are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people.  Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.  This is known as "bad luck."

Robert Heinlein
[This, in a nutshell, is the problem with socialism in all it's forms.--Joe]

# Saturday, December 03, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 03, 2005 5:33:35 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Home Life )

Xenia called earlier and told us both of her and Meghan's entries made it into the finals in state drama competition.  The competition will be over within about 15 minutes.  It probably will be another hour or so before we hear the results.  She was really excited--I could barely understand her.  Break a leg Xenia!

Update: She got third place in ensemble pantomime and a medal.  It was a skit they created on their own.

Update2: Xenia has her own post up with lots of pictures.  Caution--pictures of teenage girls in nightgowns and beds.  (That should generate some traffic for her.)

Update3: I fixed the broken link to the teenage girls in nightgowns and one wearing a bra on her head.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 03, 2005 10:03:30 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights )

The Canadian Shooting Sports Association invited Glen Caroline, director of the NRA's grassroots division, to be a keynote speaker and is give a seminar. Wendy Cukier (I wrote about her before) and other anti-freedom advocates are all bent out of shape about it. They apparently have a problem with freedom of association and freedom of speech as well as freedom to keep and bear arms.  From The Star:

U.S. gun lobbyist here to `counsel'

Canadian shooting group enlists NRA Official denies interfering with election

Nice.  The paper doesn't say the NRA is interfering in the election--they just plant that thought by saying the Canadian shooting group denies it.  Mahatma Gandhi, Henry David Thoreau, and Mother Therese would have denied being mass murderers too.

Dec. 3, 2005. 01:00 AM

BETSY POWELL
CRIME REPORTER

A crime reporter!  How appropriate for a political story.

...

But Wendy Cukier, president of the Coalition for Gun Control, said she's astonished by the blatancy of the NRA's involvement because the group's influence in jurisdictions outside the United States, while well known to people who monitor gun control issues, is not as familiar to the public at large.

"I don't think the average Canadian understands how powerful the gun lobby is," in opposing attempts to block tightening of gun control legislation and bans on handgun sales, the Ryerson professor said.

"It is ironic because it's three days before the anniversary of the Montreal massacre, it's in Toronto where most people are currently preoccupied with trying to prevent gun violence."

The NRA has a well-established tradition of "interfering" in other countries, Alun Howard, of the International Action Network on Small Arms, said yesterday by phone from London, England. "We've seen them working in Central America ... their arguments have appeared in England and Australia, so it's certainly a worrying trend that the NRA has gone global."

Most recently, the NRA's influence was credited — or blamed, depending on your viewpoint — with influencing the outcome of Brazil's national referendum in October on a proposal to ban the sale of guns.

In a country with one of the world's highest firearm murder rates, the proposal was soundly rejected.

NRA public affairs director Andrew Arulanandam said yesterday that the organization is only too happy to provide "counsel" to organizations in other countries to help ensure that "gun rights" prevail around the world, adding "we're really heartened with what happened in Brazil."

The NRA was approached because members belonging to the association share its underlying mantra: that gun control laws don't work, criminals don't obey the law, and the only people affected by gun control are law-abiding citizens, Whitmore said.

I just "love" that a "crime reporter" wrote the story, not a political reporter.  And that the reporter describes as a mantra (mystic incantation) the verifiable fact "gun control laws don't work, criminals don't obey the law, and the only people affected by gun control are law-abiding citizens."

After we are done in Iraq we need to liberate Canada from the bigots like this 'reporter'.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, December 03, 2005 9:24:09 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but didn't we have this discussion with you folks about 223 years ago? I'd have thought that having the road between Lexington and Concord fertilized with dead Redcoats answered that question back then.

...

If my ancestors would have been armed, they wouldn't have been slaves.

JJ Johnson
Black American gun-owner
Answering the poll question "Should America ban the handgun?"
BBC News -- March 1998

# Friday, December 02, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 02, 2005 7:25:43 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom )

Of course I didn't expect they would go all the way in one step.  I'm actually surprised they would even go in the right direction.  But they are making progress and everyone benefits:

TSA Would Allow Sharp Objects on Airliners

Screeners to Focus More on Bombs

A new plan by the Transportation Security Administration would allow airline passengers to bring scissors and other sharp objects in their carry-on bags because the items no longer pose the greatest threat to airline security, according to sources familiar with the plans.

In a series of briefings this week, TSA Director Edmund S. "Kip" Hawley told aviation industry leaders that he plans to announce changes at airport security checkpoints that would allow scissors less than four inches long and tools, such as screwdrivers, less than seven inches long, according to people familiar with the TSA's plans. These people spoke on condition of anonymity because the TSA intends to make the plans public Friday.

...

The TSA's internal studies show that carry-on-item screeners spend half of their screening time searching for cigarette lighters, a recently banned item, and that they open 1 out of every 4 bags to remove a pair of scissors, according to sources briefed by the agency. Officials believe that other security measures now in place, such as hardened cockpit doors, would prevent a terrorist from commandeering an aircraft with box cutters or scissors.

What's interesting to me is that they concluded the same thing as I did--explosives is the real threat and the most attention should be given to that.  We should do the research, as I outlined, and go wherever the results take us.  One step at a time if necessary, but we need to do it. 

It's interesting they dropped the plan for putting more air marshals in the air because it's too costly.  Check out my research outline for lower cost alternatives to achieve similar protection capabilities.

By: Joe Huffman Friday, December 02, 2005 6:31:43 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

ARE YOU A MENACE TO CRIMINALS?

If householders were required by law to own and know how to use revolvers, burglary would cease. It is an act of good citizenship to make crime dangerous -- an encouragement of crime to remain defenseless.

From an Iver Johnson revolver ad
Circa 1904

# Thursday, December 01, 2005
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:35:53 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Home Life )

They visited Jason today.

It was just a few days ago that Barb was asking, "Where's Bob Hope and Bing Crosby?"  A subtle slap at current celebrities that are not visiting the troops.

Here is one way if you want to show your appreciation.  I already have a couple of their albums.  I just put on Greatest Hits.  I'll be listening it to them as I go to sleep tonight.