I sort of disagree here. Rather than pick apart the article, however, I will say that this is something special because:

* the article acknowledges the existence of the Heller case

* the article actually acknowledges that an additional opinion exists on the matter of the Second Amendment; a big deal, since other disarmers even go so far as to exclude parts of the law that they don't like when reciting it

I will try very hard to stay away from commenting further, and add only that this is a microscopic step, but a step toward liberty and accountability of government nonetheless -- maybe. It may also be of interest because the much-hated Cheney is involved.