Sebastian says, "For all intents and purposes, 4473 is registration." With all due respect to Sebastian I don't think he has thought this through because there are huge differences. Even in the confiscation scenario which is one of the main objections to registration. Here are some of the differences:
As it currently stands should the government demand all 4473s be turned in there will be a lot of guns sold over 20 years ago that will be completely untraceable. And, I suspect, there will be many cases where large numbers of 4473s disappeared in a surprising number of "unfortunate fires". And even if they come knocking on your door because your name was on a 4473 from a couple years ago you can lie or have them ask your lawyer where the gun is without much fear they can actually lay there hands on the hardware.
I say if in the previous paragraph because one cop told me they can't get a warrant for drugs that someone saw even 10 days ago. There must be credible belief the item(s) to be searched for are still present when the search is to be executed. Is it credible to believe a gun that you purchased two months ago still present? Maybe. Two years ago? In the absence of registration that is a big stretch.
If that isn't clear enough compare the results of registrations required by NFA34 to the results of 4473s.
Powered by: newtelligence dasBlog 2.1.8102.813
Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.
© Copyright 2008, Joe Huffman
E-mail
Awarded July 2007
Awarded October 2008