You would think with such a vivid example less than a month previous they would understand why the right to keep and bear arms should not be infringed.
Coming to a public space near you: Guns. Lots of guns.
Weapons should only be distributed to citizens if common sense precautionary measures are applied, including extensive background checks before issuing a license and monitoring of license holders.
We may have to wait until the state of emergency ends before public debate can take place over these risky new regulations, meanwhile, we can only hope it won’t take a tragedy for the national security ministry to take measures that ensure deadly weapons don’t end up in the wrong hands.
Are these people just mind bogglingly slow learners? Or is there some sort of motivation I cannot fathom?