It’ll be OK. You’ll focus on some other inanimate object to channel your masculinity
Nate McMurray @Nate_McMurray
Tweeted on January 12, 2022
[It’s another Markley’s Law Monday!
Typical. When they lose the civil rights argument they resort to childish insults.—Joe]
Does he mean like making stupid tweets?
Poor Nate. Giving off the death rattle of a dying argument.
So, what are we being told here? Is masculinity is a bad thing, and furthermore we wouldn’t have to “channel it” if we didn’t have any, and the world would be a better place without it?
One thing is for sure, the criminal class would be happier if there were no “masculinity” to get in their way.
So, we should focus our attention on Nate McMurray? He’s an inanimate object without a thought-out position of his own, and he definitely needs a masculinity booster. I’d offer to take him to the range since he’s probably never done anything like target shooting or anything he couldn’t undo after the fact like sending a bullet through a paper target in competition, except I doubt we live in the same city, let alone state.
I work at a corporately owned outdoor store in WNY, and a few years ago I sold a shotgun to Mr McMurray. It was just after he lost his race against Chris Jacobs for NY27. It was the special election to replace Chris Collins, and he was planning to run again in the general election. I told him I was looking forward to his campaign and to remember that the second amendment was about more than hunting.
Apparently I failed to make my point.