Quote of the day—Thomas Kendall

You can certainly be assured that they will not win. That’s not at issue. Their entire goal is to lose. If you ever doubted, you’ve had the better part of a year of their stupidity to reflect on. You can quit wondering. They will lose. They want to lose. The only question is who they lose to. They want to lose to China, but I think losing to the radical Islamic world is their consolation prize.

Let’s spoil their day. Let’s make them lose to America.

Thomas Kendall
September 7, 2021
US, AT THE GATE
[Interesting idea. It’s certainly worth considering.—Joe]

Share

3 thoughts on “Quote of the day—Thomas Kendall

  1. Close. Of course you cannot say whether their goal is to “win” or “lose” until you’ve established beyond reasonable doubt which side they’re on. Enemy infiltrators win when we lose. Let’s try to be as clear as possible on that point. They are winning. We (who hold to the American principles of liberty) are losing*.

    Also, whether it’s China or Radical Islam, or the teacher’s union, et al, we’re all losing to Rome, or to the Babylonian system if you will.

    Lastly, what is it with this, “…you’ve had the better part of a year of their stupidity to reflect on”, business? I find that very strange. Being that we’ve had well over 100 years of this current insurgency to reflect on, I see no reason to single out the last 12 months or so. Every day is but an inevitable product of what went horribly wrong in 1913 and was never addressed, and THAT was but a culmination of some very strong corrupting influence which had to be active for some years, or generations, previous, and so on, and on.

    If you’ve only just become aware of this within the last year, I mean, welcome, and good for you and all, but now it’s your duty to look a bit farther, do some investigation and dig a bit deeper I should think. Just don’t ever be one of those people who say, “What happened to the good old days (meaning a few years ago, or a few decades ago) when things were all right, the media did their job (or etc.)”. There never was such a time in America, and to believe that there was is to miss the whole process and fail to see the major players. What I think some are longing for, when they point to some period in history as being free of leftist/Romish influences, is their past obliviousness, or their blissful ignorance if you will.

    *Likewise we should be mindful of another term, “rebel” or “rebellion”. Currently the rebels are often the ones holding title within our governmental institutions. We can say that for certain, and prove it, simply by upholding the constitution. Being as the constitutional standards, the “supreme law of the land”, and the principles upon which this country was (ostensibly) founded, are their enemies, many of the office holders and title holders, and their conspirators in industry and media, are rebels, and insurrectionists, and enemy infiltrators. QED.

    • Knowing the system will collapse under it’s own weight, how can it win? There is no winning. Communism is just returning us to the barbarians we always were.
      Winning, is a metaphor. In a place where everyone, and everything dies. How does one win anything?
      The question is the same for everyone. How do I live? According to my brainwashed idea of what life is?
      The guys right, Lyle.
      And the group inflicting this upon us is the most mentally lazy group to ever live. They live because we allow them to. And the constitution was just another tool for them.
      Have you ever avoided someone because you knew they would kick your ass?
      Lucky me, I had 4 older brothers.
      Being the person no one wants to fuck with. Is the best way to live. And the only universal law of nature, and nature’s god.

      • “Communism is just returning us to the barbarians we always were.”
        Robert Heinlein wrote back in 1960 that Soviet society was a gangster culture, and the way to get what you want was to throw a fit in public and refuse to be moved to privacy.

        “New Soviet Man”? Some improvement over “Economic Man”

Comments are closed.