While there’s no one-size-fit-all approach, we know there are some things that work. And the first of those that work is stemming the flow of firearms.
President Joe Biden
July 12, 2021
Biden to Promote Plan to Reduce Gun Violence
[Citation needed.
Not only that, where and how do firearms “flow”? Do books and religion flow? Does he want to stem the flow of books and religion too?
How about saying something that makes sense? Then we can talk about information flow.
That he wants to stop or dam up the exercise of a specific enumerated right tells you all you need to know about his fitness for employment as a public servant.—Joe]
He talks about the tools, but never the hands that wield them.
Yes, Gun Violence. The most dangerous place in Los Angeles should be the Gun Room in the Autry Museum of the West, but miraculously, that isn’t the case. The guns there are so close together that they should be beating each other up every day, or if they need a human to act through, the museum curators and docents should have a shootout or a pistol-whipping every night.
Joe has written about Deodands before, where inanimate objects are given human motives and abilities, but I think this is more like in Arab cultures where men blame women for being alluring to them so they require them to walk around in anonymous bags.
The gun does not cause a good man to go off the rails, and a bad man does not need a gun to do so.
That he wants to stop or dam up the exercise of a specific enumerated right tells you all you need to know about his fitness for employment as a public servant.
Fitness for employment as a public servant, yes.
Fitness for employment as a public master, on the other hand….
Robert Heinlein wrote, some fifty-five years ago in Expanded Universe that the difference between a public servant and a public master was indistinguishable.
Biden is exactly correct. Restricting the flow of weapons (and of books and religion, as you say, and information in general, staying ahead of the game of controlling the narrative) always works to create chaos and to further the causes of the authoritarian system. Remember the model we’re following here— Rome had a death decree against anyone caught with a Bible in their possession, and they tortured and murdered “heretics” by the millions.
So what’s your problem? OK, Biden may not be the best man, and he’s certainly not the smartest man, to help bring this about, but he’ll certainly do. The great thing about a president that’s in mental decline is that he’s easier to control, and the icing on that cake is that we can show the world that even with a retard as commander in chief we can do a lot to help conquer and annihilate the free world!
And so I really don’t see your problem here. They’re doing what they set out to do, they’re succeeding at it, and they’re even so confident that they can essentially thumb their noses at us and there’s nothing we can do about it. Rome elected a horse or a donkey to the senate, you’ll recall. Therefore we have some way to go still, to get from a senile man or a jihadist woman in high office, to an actual ass.
Sure, we can waive our flags and get all indignant and emotional talking about liberty and all that. We can fire off our guns, listen to country music and even talk ‘bout “Jeeyezus” while eating pork barbecue (and how many of you fail to see the irony there?), but in the long run the secular authoritarians, now joining hand-in-hand with the Romish forces, they know they will have their way with the world.
They know it for a fact, too, because unlike us, they know prophesy. Satan knows the Scriptures backwards and forwards, and he doesn’t need faith because he has knowledge, because he lived in heaven and spoke with God. And therefore, while the enemy knows exactly what they’re doing, and where they’re taking the world and how to accomplish it, we’ll remain relatively clueless, and incredulous, not necessarily even wanting to understand, right up to the end. And that means, in the simplest earthly terms, that the enemy will win because, a) we refuse to even identify it or to name it in public, and b) we still don’t understand the antidote and most of us don’t even want to.
Biden may not be the best man, and he’s certainly not the smartest man, to help bring this about, but he’ll certainly do. The great thing about a president that’s in mental decline is that he’s easier to control….
I’m firmly convinced that Biden is a patsy. He doesn’t have the mental capacity to be a successful authoritarian.
But I agree, being in mental decline does make him easier to control. Like a puppet, he’ll stand on stage and say what he’s told to say (he’ll be even more dependent on the teleprompter than Obama) to bring about the “fundamental transformation” started under his ideological predecessor.
Then, when that transformation is nearly complete, he’ll be 25’d out* — Kamala will be, too, or … otherwise removed — and whoever the throne is intended for** will graciously, solemnly, and with much reticence (hah!) step in and take over.
All for the peace and good of the nation, of course!
———
* – “25’d out” == Removed from office under the 25th Amendment.
** – Who is still not REALLY in control. He/she will still be a figurehead, just one that doesn’t need to be closely monitored like Joe.
BTW, it’s worth reading the 25th Amendment carefully.
It has been misdescribed by the left wing media as a tool for removing a president (specifically, Trump) from office. That is not actually what it does. It only enables the cabinet together with the VP to declare the President unable to serve, causing the VP to be acting President.
And a key provision is that the President can object to this. If he does, and the perps reaffirm their decision, then Congress gets to decide. Unless both houses vote by 2/3rd majorities to support the usurpers, the President resumes his duties.
Last but not least, even if Congress does support his “inability to serve” by 2/3rd majorities, that doesn’t remove the President. There is no stated limit on the number of times he can object and force Congress to decide again.
In other words, the 25th Amendment cannot set aside an unwilling president except through a steeper hurdle than impeachment (2/3rd in both houses rather than a simple majority in the House and 2/3rd in the Senate as is the case for impeachment).
So if the left pulls this stunt and Biden decides to object, the Republicans potentially hold the balance of power on keeping Biden in place, assuming the Dems all vote to set him aside. Sweet irony.
Joe and the Hoe are a wholly own subsidiary of Obama Inc.. Who’s owned by Soro, Who’s owned god-only-knows.
The pickle being that he’s trapped. Even if he wasn’t tyrant. Which he totally is. There’s so much dirt on him if he farts wrong his whole family goes to jail. Dr. Jill understands that even if Joe and Hunter can’t remember.
Point being, The puppets are all in perfect order. There’s no way for us to stop what’s coming. Even if the right mustered enough political capital to get rid of Biden. He would only be replaced by a moronic whore fiercely loyal to her pip.(Obama). And everything will continue as planned.
The nice thing is that while were circling the drain. You get to see all the front people. We get to clearly see all the converged organizations. All them that somehow think they can……Win? (I don’t know cause no one ever has.)
But what Joe says about guns is the same that’s about to happen to just about everything we need for a decent society. Not just our rights.
That could be why Jill consented to putting her husband in the Presidential office. I thought for a while that she wanted to be First Lady or she wouldn’t have left her first husband for the Plagiaristic racist, but on the other hand she must know that the courts put severe limits on applying the doctrine of the “Innocent Spouse”.
“While there’s no one-size-fit-all approach, we know there are some things that work. And the first of those that work is stemming the flow of flying purple people eaters.”
As long as he makes no effort to make sense, you might as well substitute something else… anything you want.
“While there’s no one-size-fit-all approach, we know there are some things that work. And the first of those that work is [insert one-size-fit-all approach].”
One common factor of socialist dictatorships is that all problems are “solved” with one-size-fit-all approaches.
When the ideological starting point is that everyone is equal and has equal access to everything, and the ending point is that the government blindly decides everything for you and everyone else, there’s literally zero leeway for individualized solutions.
I fully expect to hear this kind of rhetorical doublespeak for the next three-and-a-half years.
Procrustean Programs.
Another reason for the Leftist Teachers to avoid actually teaching anything that resembles history or literature, or anything that might help people think.
Not only that, where and how do firearms “flow”?
During the casting process?