Quote of the day—Biden for President

Federal law prevents hunters from hunting migratory game birds with more than three shells in their shotgun. That means our federal law does more to protect ducks than children. It’s wrong. Joe Biden will enact legislation to once again ban assault weapons. This time, the bans will be designed based on lessons learned from the 1994 bans. For example, the ban on assault weapons will be designed to prevent manufacturers from circumventing the law by making minor changes that don’t limit the weapon’s lethality.

As president, Biden will pursue legislation to regulate possession of existing assault weapons under the National Firearms Act.

Biden for President
October 2, 2019
THE BIDEN PLAN TO END OUR GUN VIOLENCE EPIDEMIC
[That’s just a small part of the pain Biden promises to inflict upon gun owners. He claims he would also ban the online sale of ammunition and gun parts. He claims he would give states incentives to register all firearms. He claims he would “Put America on the path to ensuring that 100% of firearms sold in America are smart guns.” He claims he would, “Prohibit the use of federal funds to arm or train educators to discharge firearms.”

The list goes on and on and on.

And check out the URL for the web page: https://joebiden.com/gunsafety/. “gunsafety”? Yeah. Orwellian doublespeak.

Just say, “No!” as clearly as is practical. The Democrats need to hear that with absolutely zero ambiguity.—Joe]

13 thoughts on “Quote of the day—Biden for President

  1. “Plans to regulate possession of existing AW’s thru the NFA”. And thank you Donald Trump for setting that up for us! Yep, all you got to do is have some dipstick at the ATF say it’s a machine gun and POW! You got to give up or destroy your gun.(If it worked on a piece of plastic. bump stocks anyone?, it will certainly work on your AR an magazines!)
    The good part is how predictable the herd of weasels actually are.
    What’s the bet that the next Democrat elected does exactly that. No matter which one it is?

  2. I love the fact that presidential candidates say they will “enact” legislation that will…

    Presidents can PROPOSE legation but only congress can ENACT legislation. Obviously knowledge of the Constitution is not required of presidential candidates or even the President, even though they are required to take an oath to preserve, protect and defend it.

  3. Sometimes legal to hunt ducks. Always illegal to hunt children. Yes, the law is definitely providing more protection to ducks.

    • Then there are the women who say, in public with a straight face and without irony, that they want to be treated with the same protective laws as guns. Right-O, you can’t go outside unless you’re concealed, can’t go to bars or restaurants that serve alcohol, some of you would be banned outright in certain states due to features you might have, features that were arbitrarily selected to reduce the number of you in the state, there’s a waiting period and transfers have to be made through a (we could call it a Federal Female Licensed trader.
      And this doesn’t even address safe-storage laws!

      And these are the same women who think that the Handmaid’s tale is what will happen if Christians highly regulated as to what they can do, but not the Muslims.

  4. I understand a lot of this may be posturing for the proles, not that every bit of it is not solidly-held desires on the Left, but….

    I doubt they’d listen to anyone, but someone needs to make a sincere attempt; if they persist it will lead to Not A Good Place that no one on either side will find at all enjoyable.

  5. Wait; so they’re going to start issuing licenses to hunt children? That doesn’t seem right at all. Those bastards!

  6. I have gotten courts to approve conservatorship’s for people more coherent than Joe Biden.

  7. Pingback: Quote of the day—Jacob Sullum | The View From North Central Idaho

  8. Pingback: Quote of the day—SPQR | The View From North Central Idaho

  9. “Federal law prevents hunters from hunting migratory game birds with more than three shells in their shotgun. That means our federal law does more to protect ducks than children.”

    The logical response to this straw man brain dead argument is to respond to the person spouting it by saying one would GLADLY limit themselves to three rounds in the weapon at a time if HUNTING HUMANS was truly a legal sport.

  10. Pingback: SayUncle » Noted gun expert Joe Biden

Comments are closed.