4 thoughts on “Democrats are why

  1. “Criminal prisoners who identify as Democrats outnumber all other political affiliations combined by a factor of more than two.”

    Hmm. According to the way leftists would have others think, the only conclusion to be drawn from that statistic would be that, clearly, there is widespread discrimination against Democrats. If there is disproportionate representation of Democrats in prisons, it can only be because of deliberate targeting of Democrats, due to bigotry and widespread unfairness within the criminal justice system, in a culture that was unfairly aligned against them in the first place.

    Thus they will use such statistics to blame you and especially to blame America rather than to examine themselves or their own morals and dogma. They’ll see it as an outrage, then, that you would use the very proof of your own bigotry in an attempt to criticize them!

    If a hundred Democrats are sent to jail, then fairness demands that at least a hundred conservatives, or patriots, or Christians, go to jail. Actually the numbers should be reversed. There should be far more patriots, libertarians and Christains going to jail because they set up this biased, patriarchal system which forces Democrats to break the laws thus alienating them and keeping them permeanently in a state of disadvantage.

    How DARE YOU blame the victims here, you BASTARD!

    That’s the mindset. Charles Manson articulated it very well, back in the 1970s as I recall, but we can hear prominent Democrats articulating it right now.

    It’s the mind of Lucifer, really; enforcing laws is tyrannical because laws were meant to be broken and so how can you possibly expect anyone to obey them, you evil, oppressive, greedy, holier-than-thou bastard! It’s all a setup, see, for the purpose of repression.

    Most Democrats won’t come right out and say all of this openly, but enough of them do, and they get cheers and accolades from the others for doing it.

    • This is settled, leftist doctrine. Their “love is vengeance, that’s never free”. Here is but one example, out of millions, from decades ago;

      “No one knows what it’s like
      To be the bad man
      To be the sad man
      Behind blue eyes
      No one knows what it’s like
      To be hated
      To be fated
      To telling only lies
      But my dreams
      They aren’t as empty
      As my conscience seems to be
      I have hours, only lonely
      My love is vengeance
      That’s never free
      No one knows what it’s like
      To feel these feelings
      Like I do
      And I blame you
      No one bites back as hard
      On their anger
      None of my pain and woe
      Can show through
      But my dreams
      They aren’t as empty
      As my conscience seems to be
      I have hours, only lonely
      My love is vengeance
      That’s never free
      When my fist clenches, crack it open
      Before I use it and lose my cool
      When I smile, tell me some bad news
      Before I laugh and act like a fool
      And if I swallow anything evil
      Put your finger down my throat
      And if I shiver, please give me a blanket
      Keep me warm, let me wear your coat
      No one knows what it’s like
      To be the bad man
      To be the sad man
      Behind blue eyes”

  2. This was actually out and out admitted to a few years back by Dilbert creator Scott Adams. I may not care for the man’s politics, but I find the rather frank honesty refreshing! He says:

    ” Posted June 22, 2016 in: #clinton2016, #Trump

    On average, Democrats (that’s my team*) use guns for shooting the innocent. We call that crime.

    On average, Republicans use guns for sporting purposes and self-defense.

    If you don’t believe me, you can check the statistics on the Internet that don’t exist. At least I couldn’t find any that looked credible.

    But we do know that race and poverty are correlated. And we know that poverty and crime are correlated. And we know that race and political affiliation are correlated. Therefore, my team (Clinton) is more likely to use guns to shoot innocent people, whereas the other team (Trump) is more likely to use guns for sporting and defense.

    That’s a gross generalization. Obviously. Your town might be totally different.

    So it seems to me that gun control can’t be solved because Democrats are using guns to kill each other – and want it to stop – whereas Republicans are using guns to defend against Democrats. Psychologically, those are different risk profiles. And you can’t reconcile those interests, except on the margins. For example, both sides might agree that rocket launchers are a step too far. But Democrats are unlikely to talk Republicans out of gun ownership because it comes off as “Put down your gun so I can shoot you.”

    The rest can be found on his blog: https://blog.dilbert.com/2016/06/22/why-gun-control-cant-be-solved-in-the-usa/

    • “Put down your gun so I can shoot you.”

      That is perfect. It explains the one and only reason there have ever been weapons restrictions, anywhere, ever.

      To the extent that there is a “correlation between poverty and race” in this country in the 21st Century, it is the result of ideology only. It’s from Democrats buying off former civil rights leaders and using them to foment leftist ideologies among black people. It’s the Plantation of the Democrat Welfare State.

      In both cases then (criminal violence and poverty) wiping out leftist ideologies, exterminating the mindset of failure and replacing it with the mindset of hope, would appear to be the solution.

      From the song lyrics above;
      And if I swallow anything evil
      Put your finger down my throat

      There it is, right there. Sort of. The evil leftist mindset, which has been swallowed and digested by billions of people, isn’t going away by acts of physical force, as in grabbing them and sticking a finger down their throats.

      As much as they’d like to be saved by an act of force on someone else’s part, the fact is they have to make that decision to repent.

      As for shivering and asking for my coat, it doesn’t work that way either, if I understand the allegory. The way that works is, in repentance and faith, one is granted the cloak of the righteousness of Christ, as an altogether undeserved gift. In the meantime I’d be glad to give someone my own coat, but that’s not salvation for either of us.

Comments are closed.