Quote of the day—Kurt Schlichter

My question for Congressjerk Eric Swalwell is pretty simple: “How many Americans would you murder to achieve your goal of disarming us?”

It’s a fair question.

Swalwell is the MSNBC stalwart who recently wrote an op-ed advocating that the government confiscate the guns that make people like him wet themselves and imprison those of us who decline to surrender them. Millions of Americans own these basic tools of freedom, which the ignorant call “assault weapons,” and these loyal citizens keep and bear them to protect themselves, their families, their communities and their Constitution. But Rep. Swalwell would make these citizens felons, though these patriots are only a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants.

Of course, he wants to make these patriots felons because they are a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants. After all, that’s what leftist Democrats like him are.

So, the question remains. Our liberal elite betters think we should be stripped of those scary bangsticks the Constitution protects, and we disagree. So, Rep. Swalwell, how many Americans are you willing to kill to fulfill your vision of a disarmed, defenseless, servile population of docile subjects?

One?

One hundred?

One thousand?

One hundred thousand?

More?

Kurt Schlichter
December 6, 2018
How Much Blood Would Leftists Be Willing To Shed To Disarm Patriotic Americans?
[Via a tweet from G R Schneider‏ @straightcase.

That’s a very good question. The answer, and even a non-answer, will be very telling.—Joe]

10 thoughts on “Quote of the day—Kurt Schlichter

  1. The leftists have had this conversation amongst themselves. You all know this. It’s been mentioned enough, and sourced, and cited. If you search hard enough you can probably find it. The answer is, millions. Tens of millions, as I recall.

    And again; ten, twenty, or thirty million dead is practically nothing in the mind of most any leftist. It’s only one small step in depopulating the planet to “sustainable” levels.

    You know they all believe the planet is in jeopardy because there are “too many” people.

    They’ve been indoctrinating public school children in this mentality at least since the 1960s, when I and my classmates were taught to live in morbid fear of the “Population Time Bomb”. “Overpopulation” is the cause of poverty, they teach, and environmental problems, etc.

    Extend that on your own, and you end up at, “Bad weather? Forrest fires? Then kill enough people and it will all get better”.

    If you’re a true believer in their doctrine, you’d be horrified at the “breeders” as they call us families who have children, and you’d long deeply for some plague or war to reduce the global population.

    Remember the British Prince who openly stated that he wished he could be reincarnated as a “deadly virus” (thus exhibiting spiritism and death worship) “to contribute something to solving overpopulation”.

    “To contribute something”.

    You can find thousands of similar quotes, starting generations ago and continuing to this day.

    Think about that for a few years, then come back to the conversation.

    If you don’t understand how your enemy thinks, plans, organizes and fights, you’re way outside of his OODA loop.

    No, Young Grasshopper; don’t get all indignant in trying to shame the left over their mass killing fantasies. They’re proud of it, they see it not merely as “legit” but as vitally necessary. Thus they see conservatives as gibbering, drooling idiots for not seeing the strategic landscape, nor hearing the evidence in front of their faces, much less understanding the tactical situation.

    On that last point only, I tend to agree with the left.

    Keep in mind that you cannot shame leftists over the issue of mass killing. They practically worship Margaret Sanger, Eugenicist, remember? Good and evil are whatever we make them to be, remember?

    So on what grounds do you presume to say that mass killing, which would not only save the planet but rid the world of those who deny the reality that the planet needs saved, is wrong?. Hmm?

    I’m trying, you see, to get you to realize that your system of morality (not thinking or logic or reason, but morality, your sense of right and wrong) is rooted in Judaeo/Christian Civilization only, and that it is the Judaeo/Christian Civilization which is under attack. Others do not share that morality, much of the world never shared that morality, and so for them killing people for political or practical ends, or matters of convenience, is not wrong, it is normal and often necessary and no cause for shame.

    It’s also an ages-old tradition.

    So what, exactly, is your problem with it?

    • The simple answer then is this – we need all of our guns to shoot you sonsabitches. Which would ultimately be good for the planet. Would you please stand still now? You’re messing up my aim.

  2. I honestly think there is a number. 290 million. He’s probably one of those nuts that think the world would be a better place if most of the world population was exterminated. I come up with that number as that is roughly 90% of the United States population. After all he allies themselves with far left progressive radicals that want the government to kill EVERYONE that is not part of there far left progressive e collective. Oh, and all that are that are white males too.

    He’s already shown to have complete disregard for life outside of California and New York. So if the entire population of every single state besides California and New York were exterminated that may be too much. Just include some liberal coastal states that don’t face distraction but kill all the white people in them.

  3. 10, 20, or even 100 million deaths may not matter to a leftist, but I can assure you that there is one (1) death each one of them cares about very deeply. Their own.

    The left may also have had a conversation among those with IQs above room temperature (this excludes Swalwell) that includes reviewing the following thought exercise:

    “They will “fight” to the last ATF agent or to the last oath-breaking soldier. Will they fight to the first senior bureaucrat, the second Congressman, the third newspaper editor, the fourth Senator, the fifth White House aide? Can they stand Bill Clinton’s rules of engagement?”

    4th Generation Warfare is what they’ll get. If/when it kicks off, it won’t be pretty and a lot of people who shouldn’t get hurt will be. Swalwell and his ilk will have to stay indoors, behind tall walled off ‘safezone’ enclaves, guarded by dozens of who knows precisely how ‘loyal’ guards for the rest of their lives.

    The barely above iron age technology, nearly illiterate Afghans & Iraqis have shown that ‘outside’, no matter how thick the plating is on their personal MRAPs, an IED will confirm the statement that any problem can be solved with the proper application of enough High Explosives.
    And from the significant number of assassinations performed by “friendlies” over there, inside their bastions, they’re not entirely off the hook either.

    Let them consider what it will be like here. I suggest buying more stock in companies that manufacture insomnia, headache and gastric distress remedies.

  4. Slight topic-jack, but somewhat following from Kurt’s fairly steady stream of commentary:

    Anyone know of any daily pro-gun podcasts I can subscribe to?

    My daily go-to was Cam and Company, but apparently a whole lot of talent was laid off from NRA TV on Nov 28th, so that’s gone. (Hard to find news about it until I found a bunch of crowing stories on Media Matters and other hyper-progressive propoganda sources. Kinda disappointed that there weren’t respectful stories about it in non-progressive sources…)

    Seriously, need a podcast for Seattle commutes.

Comments are closed.