This fight has never been, and never will be, about WHETHER people should own guns because criminals and government will always have them no matter what. Rather, the only question regarding guns is whether the honest and the law-abiding should also have them.
Anyone who opposes an unadulterated second amendment is therefore a criminal, a would-be criminal, has emotionally bonded with criminals, or has fallen for the lies of criminals to such an extent that this basic, irrefutable, self-evident line of reasoning is abandoned. There is simply no other possible conclusion.
May 7, 2018
Comment to Quote of the day—Hieu Nguyen
[I have nothing to add.—Joe]
Not necessarily a criminal. They could be a totalitarian.
@Richard: that’s a distinction without a difference.