Criminal psychology

I’m in the process of making a post on personality disorders, liberalism, and how to deal with them. I read a fascinating blog post about it. It is very long but awesome. I’ll get my synopsis out in a day or three.

In the mean time I engaged an anti-gun person on Twitter to do some testing. Here is the result:

@DanielHupke @_Garreth_ If only that BOOM was another #gunbully eating his gun.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@ConcldCourier @snwflk713 @_Garreth_ @PatriotTay @MomsDemand Come on baby, suck that gun, pull that trigger.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@ConcldCourier @snwflk713 @_Garreth_ @PatriotTay @MomsDemand Suck the bullets out!

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

Eh. There wasn’t any bullying to be seen. There was only law-abiding citizens exercising their rights. @rosesindew @HelloPoodle

— Linoge (@linoge_wotc) November 12, 2013

@linoge_wotc @rosesindew Funny how THAT got you needing to advertise your gun-gun.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

I hate to break it to you, but I’ve been lawfully bearing arms for over a decade now. #assumption #fail @HelloPoodle @rosesindew

— Linoge (@linoge_wotc) November 12, 2013

@linoge_wotc @rosesindew So what? Why is it such a big deal that you’ve got to point your guns at people?

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @linoge_wotc @rosesindew People that attempt to infringe our rights are either ignorant or criminals: http://t.co/7VZA2zFoAJ

— Joe Huffman (@JoeHuffman) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc @rosesindew You have every right to shoot yourselves. Stay in your own yard & play together.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

HelloPoodle @linoge_wotc @rosesindew We do. Our yard is called the United States of America. If you don’t like it go someplace else.

— Joe Huffman (@JoeHuffman) November 12, 2013

@rosesindew @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc I love watching cunts like you get obsessed with me. Love it. Hilarious. Shows your true motives.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc @rosesindew Nah, I got the anchor babies on ObamaCare now. Lots of free shit, ya know? Hoo hoo ha ha #RWNJ

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc it’s called exposing gun control advocates as the bullies they are, ur doing a great job helping me!

— Christine Larios (@rosesindew) November 12, 2013

@rosesindew @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc Nah, you’re just a cunt who wanted attention & sympathy she didn’t get. A little ego maniacal.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc Keep talking about your big guns & how nobody is gunna take ’em. Paranoid much?

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@rosesindew @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc Like your mom?

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc again thanks for proving me right over and over

— Christine Larios (@rosesindew) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc more like you

@rosesindew @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc Yes, we’ve proven you’re a cunt & this isn’t about guns at all. Just that you’re scum.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@rosesindew @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc My, aren’t you the attention whore. Do a cartwheel now!

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @rosesindew @linoge_wotc People who conspire to infringe the rights of others go to prison. You should find a good lawyer.

— Joe Huffman (@JoeHuffman) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc Oooohh you’re being conspired against now. Tin foil hat a little tight?

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc You have had EVERY opportunity to show responsibility in gun ownership. But what have you chosen to do?

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @rosesindew @linoge_wotc I’m just gathering evidence to be submitted at your trial.

— Joe Huffman (@JoeHuffman) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc Public opinion is drastically rising against you. Again, it’s about the tea party crap, not guns.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @rosesindew @linoge_wotc I’m a certified firearms instructor. What have you done beside commit crimes against gun owners?

— Joe Huffman (@JoeHuffman) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc You’re just too fucking stupid to realize you don’t point guns at soccer moms to get their support.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc I’ll alert the press. This should be good.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc What “crimes” are being done to you? Are you feeling unsafe again? They’re coming for you!

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @rosesindew @linoge_wotc I hope your delusions are worth it. It must be lonely in your imaginary world: http://t.co/5xI0QbHMsF

— Joe Huffman (@JoeHuffman) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @rosesindew @linoge_wotc http://t.co/7VZA2zFoAJ

— Joe Huffman (@JoeHuffman) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc Well, you have your guns. For now.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @rosesindew @linoge_wotc That sounds like a threat. It’s going into your file.

— Joe Huffman (@JoeHuffman) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc You really are fucking paranoid. Not sure you should have weapons. @NewYorkFBI

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc Ooooooh, the teatard is scary!

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@JoeHuffman @rosesindew @linoge_wotc Don’t you mean FOIL? They’re out there. Whop whop! Here come the black helicopters!

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

So @HelloPoodle is back to wishing death on those she disagrees with? Must suck to be that consumed by hate. @rosesindew @JoeHuffman

— Linoge (@linoge_wotc) November 12, 2013

@HelloPoodle @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc @rosesindew You wood think a poodle would be more laid back. Must be tough having a bark & no bite

— Hal (@Hal_Maine) November 12, 2013

@linoge_wotc @rosesindew @JoeHuffman Oh, look, you’re back for more. Actually, it’s fun hating scum suckers like you. Dumb pig.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@Hal_Maine @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc @rosesindew Yeah, I better show everybody my gun so they’ll wonder if I might be dangerous.

— hellopoodle (@HelloPoodle) November 12, 2013

@Hal_Maine @JoeHuffman @linoge_wotc @rosesindew Gotta make sure you let everybody know you’re carrying though, right? NRA bumper sticker?

6 thoughts on “Criminal psychology

  1. YMMV, Joe, but I see no value in communicating with these cretins. It may demonstrate their logical and societal failures, but do we really need to spend our valuable time rolling in the mud and pigshit of their stys? Remember that in these man-pig exchanges, we get dirty and the pigs love it.

  2. Are you sure that you are really communicating with a real live person? I have seen automated response programs that exhibit as much sense. There was one program in the seventies that simulated the communications patterns of a paranoid of some sort. There was also a program called Eliza that would pick up key words and repeat them back to you as a question. (The author was appalled at the intimate details that people were revealing to a relatively simple computer program. The old TTY paper was piling up, and being left behind on the printer, or on the floor, or in the wastebasket.) This guy makes about as much sense.

    Maybe somebody has created automated anti-gun troll software just to pick fights.

  3. Agreed, these people are “nuts” and probably would fail a Turing test.

    According to the article I read this is one of the expected outcomes if you handle them correctly. Imagine getting this sort of response from the head of the Brady Campaign or Mayor Bloomberg. That sort of response would expose them as the mental cases they really are.

    I plan to practice on low level, low influence anti-gun people then work my way up.

  4. Interesting exchange. Still I must caution you on your rules of engagement.

    There was a time when I would have a joyous time quoting then buffoonery of MikeB302000, Laci (the Other Mike B) The Dog, and Jadegold.

    They are certainly horrible people, with a nasty case of narcissism, bigoted hatred for anybody who doesn’t agree with them, and have no desire to be diplomatic about their antisocial behavior.

    Still these are indeed just “Nuts on the Internet”, and they speak for nobody but themselves. Just as I would be very upset if somebody claimed my comments or blog posts were also speaking for say the NRA or the Second Amendment Foundation (despite me being a life member of both…and no similar membership being available for anti-rights groups).

    So I choose to focus on paid and/or titled members for vetted anti-gun lobby groups. Now many of these vetted represented of the anti-gun lobby do indeed rub elbows with the above mentioned Misanthropes (because when all your compatriots can comfortably fit in a nice hotel suite you have no issues with adding degenerates and drug dealers to the fold) and I take those gems when I can get them.

    So what I warn you is make sure you get a good unit effort for your work. Its one thing to prove that some lunatic is both misanthropic, hateful, and horrible, and is also anti-gun is one thing.

    To point out that Joan Peterson has openly advocated for full-on-confiscation of lawfully held guns a-la UK and Australia, and that it isn’t “Confiscation” if Daddy.gov cuts you a check for your destroyed rifle or pistol.
    http://www.weerdworld.com/2011/their-words/

    And THEN to show that years later she is STILL invited to the very “exclusive” Brady Campaign annual meeting
    http://www.weerdworld.com/2013/bradys-appeal-to-their-base/ (Scroll down for picture)

    You brand that whole group with that agenda.

  5. I see what you were doing there, Joe. As the article stated; it’s a lot more difficult to do in a remote medium like that, but there were some of the predicted reactions starting to come forth.

    What I think the author may have missed in his very thoughtful analysis is that someone like the military officer who dressed down Mike Wallace is probably not executing a pre-determined, pre-organized plan or technique– He is speaking extemporaneously. He does that because he is guided, at that moment at least, by “right reason”. It’s something that “happens to” a person, and some people have it happen more than others.

    Now you combine that with the sort of scientific understanding of the psychological machinery the author of that article is studying (which the hypnotist understands very well, by the way– the fact that stress is the leverage point for many people, which guides their very “belief” system) and you really have something.

    The Soviet social engineers, the global psychological warfare practitioners, understand this stuff extremely well. It’s been used with such skill that we’ve been in a state of total, all-out war now for generations and we don’t even know it.

    Since I live and work with that sort of personality, I’ll be doing some experiments of my own, but it will have to come at the right time.

Comments are closed.