#ICouldHaveBeenARepublicanBut – but not trying to compensate for my tiny penis by starting wars or having a big gun
jimmy streich (@streicher187)
Tweeted on February 5, 2013
[It’s another Markley’s Law Monday!—Joe]
The View From North Central Idaho
Ramblings on explosives, guns, politics, and sex by a redneck Idaho farm boy who became a software engineer living near Seattle.
Why did this person admit to having a tiny penis on Twitter?
Wasn’t planning on running for office in NY or a career in Hollywood.
I thought that was a requirement for those industries.
Is that how WW2 started? Churchill and Roosevelt were compensating for tiny Penises? Penii?
Hitler discovered that the Poles tended to be “better hung” than himself. A few months later, someone pointed out that the Belgians were even better endowed on average, and that the French had “devices for extending one’s endowment” (as evidenced by various unsolicited snailmails). It all sorta went downhill from there.
For some reason, not many history books ‘expose’ this aspect of WWII.
‘Course not, they all focus on the “guns” and “politics”. Which, of course, is just another euphemism for “penile envy”.
And I’m probably going to some historian hell for typing that first reply. LOL
So, if Democrats don’t start wars because of their tiny penises, then why ARE they starting another war? Plain old blood lust?