What happened to the old fashioned way of using your car to compensate for penis size? Suddenly I feel a wee bit less safe indulging in my coffee in the morning.
Yutsano
March 4, 2010
Comment to Open Thread: Penis Substitutes At the Ready!
[It’s another Markley’s Law Monday!—Joe]
I forget who commented on that blog post that “anyone who would open carry in public is a wiener.”
Do they not think things through or do they believe it is good and safe to insult people who know how to use guns and carry them, such as police and military?
The most amazing statement from that blog was to refer to the “five justices in favor of the government”, referring of course, to the more conservative bloc. He (or to be charitable, She) is blind to the form of government power without limit or appeal represented by and favored by, Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, who believe that it is due to the unique nature of health insurance this time, that this time the federal government can compel people to buy something this time. At least until the next time a unique thing comes along. An example might be healthful food that would reduce the need for expensive health care.
“What happened to the old fashioned way of using your car to compensate for penis size?”
It’s still used by some, but liberals tend to use their mouths instead.
Can we consider it stipulated that Markley’s Syndrome sufferers are actually suffering from penis envy?
M
@Mark, I am more inclined to think they either want a vagina or seek castration.
Jeez, don’t these anti-gun people do anything besides fantasize about other people’s dicks? Some of them need to get a life.
Because I already had the Corvette and it wasn’t enough!
@Joe, Heh. OTOH, on the car thing, anybody ever comment on the simularity between Prius and Priapus? Can there be some intent there?
M
Now DJ, leave Gavin Newsom’s wife and Barney Frank out of this discussion.
This statement is along the same vein as when Progressives use the computer to compensate for brain size. Why is it on the left that the more highly held the conviction the knowledge of the issue is in inverse proportion ?