A step closer to freedom

Canadians took another step closer to freedom last night:

A decision by MPs in Ottawa to repeal the federal long-gun registry was met with harsh criticism by the Quebec government, and law enforcement groups across the country.

MPs voted 164-137 last evening to repeal the federal long-gun registry, despite police assertions that it saves lives.

The proposed legislation now moves to an all-party committee for public hearings before it returns to the House of Commons for a final vote and then heads to the Senate.

If the bill makes it through Parliament, it would mean the dismantling of eight million firearms records, say police.

The article is very negative on the news. The only thing positive in the article about the proposed easing of the infringements on an inalienable right is the following:

Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu, the president of the Association des familles de personnes assassinées ou disparues du Québec, said he hopes yesterday’s decision will allow lawmakers to focus on more pressing matters.

“There are fewer and fewer hunting guns being bought, because fewer people are hunting, not because the registry has been a success,” Boisvenu said. “The real problem is caused by knives and handguns. (The long-gun registry) has cost $1 billion, and it’s not up to date. About half the people on that registry have changed addresses by now.”

Boisvenu, whose daughter Julie was kidnapped, raped and strangled to death in June 2002, said the money would be better spent cracking down on the trade of handguns and knives, many of which are funnelled through Native reserves. He said the long-gun registry would not have prevented a tragedy like the Polytéchnique massacre.

“All the mass killers have done their crimes with illegal guns,” he said. “There is nothing in place to stop someone from getting a gun on the black market and going to kill someone.”

If our president was doing his job he would praise the legislations and encourage them to hurry it through to completion–other presidents were advocates of liberty why not all?

3 thoughts on “A step closer to freedom

  1. Because he is an advocate of Egalite’. Liberte’ can come after Egalite’ and Fraternite’ are established.

  2. “Boisvenu, whose daughter Julie was kidnapped, raped and strangled to death in June 2002, said the money would be better spent cracking down on the trade of handguns and knives…”

    Odd; I don’t see a handgun or a knife in the “kidnapped, raped and strangled to death” bit. Maybe they just left that part out. Not that it would matter, being as they’ve dispensed with all logic from the start. How about cracking down on criminals? But that would leave nothing for the legislators to do, wouldn’t it?

    We can’t have that, can we, so how about we put them on the streets and use them as regular law enforcement? They can be the ones doing the physical arrests of these murderers. I’m sure they can handle it, being smarter (in their minds) than everyone else they’ve ever met.

    Cracking down on knives? Your average chef is going to have a hard time cutting his vegetables, then, eh? Time we crack down on restaurants, obviously. We can require that all food be processed at central, government certified and supervised locations and delivered to the consumer such that no knives are ever required for its consumption. I’ve no doubt whatsoever that you could find some blithering retard in the House of Commons who’d support that if you presented it right.

    I wonder if these people realize the depths of stupidity and insanity that normal people see in their rhetoric.

  3. “…despite police assertions that it saves lives.”

    Assertions aren’t worth the TP they are printed on. Assertions without proof are absolutely worthless.

    BOHICA, I think there is another assertion coming….

Comments are closed.