Reports are coming in that it went well in California this morning.
David Hardy has some news but the good stuff is here (I cherry picked the mini-posts):
Why can’t we assume without deciding that the second amendment is incorporated? What would change? Alameda still floundering.
Why isn’t this a summary judgement case? Apparently since guns aren’t posessed at a gun show for self defense then Heller doesn’t apply… Weird.
Alameda has serious foot in mouth. Just agreed that only dimwitted judges would not accept incorporation arguments.
Alameda says Heller does not guarantee guns! Judge is dragging her through the mud.
What if fairground isn’t a sensitive place? Then we would have to declare ordinance null (judge question and statement) What is sensitive about a fairgrounds? Is every government property a sensitive place? Schools and govt buildings. Invitees who don’t know eachother, thus it is a sensitive place. Gun shows cause liability problems, look at fairground shooting that caused 11 liability lawsuits.
Oh no, we had one shooting at the fairgrounds! 11 people, 4 of them children! What about shootings in office buildings? Gun show was not in place when the shooting happened. Gun shows in conjunction with other events did not cause problems. Open carry us allowed! Metal detectors to detect illegal concealed firearms. County has no problem with firearms carried for self defense. Alameda is screwed!
Alameda GETTING HAMMERED! Legislature can ban guns tomorrow based on her antiquated case law.
Update2: Also via Dave Hardy we have a decision (sort of).