From the Seattle Times:
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear arguments on whether the federal government must regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant, a case that could have broad implications for utilities, auto manufacturers and other industries nationwide.
The high court agreed Monday to consider whether the Bush administration must regulate carbon dioxide in order to combat global warming.
CO2????? If it weren’t for it being a violation of the various rights (sometimes I wonder why I should respect the rights of those that don’t respect my rights to keep and bear arms) the way I would reduce CO2 emissions would be to encourage the environmental wackos to stop breathing. This attack from the wackos is not about “global warming” or “climate change”. The man-made effects on the global climate are so small it’s almost impossible to measure. Therefore the motivation for these attacks can only be attributed to something else. Possible candidates for the real reason include anti-capitalism, a scam to make money by the proponents of these claims, and mental disorders. I’m partial the mental disorder hypothesis myself–When Prophecy Fails successfully explains many of these nut cases.
Did you know that water vapor is a bigger contributor to the green house effect than CO2? See also Jeff’s post on this subject. And that when gasoline or diesel is burned it produces more water vapor (by volume, not mass) than it does CO2? Of course we could always limit water vapor emissions from the wackos as well.