From the BBC News — Blunkett plans tougher terror law
Home Secretary David Blunkett wants new anti-terrorism laws to make it easier to convict British terror suspects. He has discussed lowering the standard of proof required by a court and introducing more pre-emptive action.
Just a couple of steps further. They already given up the right to be confronted with charges and a speedy trial. From the same article:
The Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 allows foreigners who are suspected international terrorists to be detained indefinitely without charge or trial in the event their lives would be in danger if they were dported.
Britain is holding 14 foreign terror suspects under this law, based on evidence which is tested in secret.
They are planning for secret trials and inability to confront your accusors, again from the same article:
Evidence in the new trials would be kept secret from the defendants to protect MI5, MI6 and GCHQ intelligence sources, Mr Blunkett said.
And they have already given up part of the right to remain silent, from the BBC guide to suspect rights:
The previously important right of silence was amended by the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. Courts can now draw conclusions from your silence…
And of course everyone knows they gave up their right to keep and bear arms years ago. It’s likely that it won’t be long before they realize the right to keep and bear arms is what guarantees the preservation of other inalienable rights. Now would be a good time to review The Road to Serfdom by F. A. Hayek again. Hayek spells out why socialism is a slippery slope whose inevitable conclusion is the loss of economic and person freedom resulting in tyranny. It’s not that the proponents of the socialist system were intending for that to happen, but that it is a necessary conclusion of it’s implementation. And that the good intentioned, probably trustworthy, early promoters, will be pushed out by those who crave the power and will abuse it. It’s excellent reading material.